Cargando…

High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Efflux Capacity as a Novel Prognostic Surrogate for Coronary Artery Disease

Aim: We examined the impact of baseline high-density lipoprotein cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) on major cardiac adverse events (MACE) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) during a long-term secondary prevention. Method: CEC was measured using a cell-based efflux system in (3)[H]-choles...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hisauchi, Itaru, Ishikawa, Tetsuya, Ayaori, Makoto, Uto-Kondo, Harumi, Koshikawa, Yuri, Ukaji, Tomoaki, Nakamura, Hidehiko, Mizutani, Yukiko, Taguchi, Isao, Nakajima, Takatomo, Mutoh, Makoto, Ikewaki, Katsunori
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japan Atherosclerosis Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8265426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32908115
http://dx.doi.org/10.5551/jat.59279
Descripción
Sumario:Aim: We examined the impact of baseline high-density lipoprotein cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) on major cardiac adverse events (MACE) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) during a long-term secondary prevention. Method: CEC was measured using a cell-based efflux system in (3)[H]-cholesterol-labeled J774 macrophages in apolipoprotein B-depleted plasma between January 2011 and January 2013. Patients with CAD were divided into 2 groups as a boundary CEC value of 1: 0.19 ≤ CEC <1 (impaired CEC group, mean CEC of 0.76±0.16, n =136), and 1 ≤ CEC ≤ 2.08 (enhanced CEC group, 1.20±0.19, n =44). MACE, comprised the incidence of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and any revascularizations (RV) without restenosis approximately 1 year after vascularization, was retrospectively investigated at September 2019. Impact of enhanced CEC on MACE among 22 variables was examined by applying a Cox proportional hazard model. Result: The frequency of MACE in impaired CEC group (16.9%, mean observational interval of 2111±888 days) was significantly higher than that in enhanced CEC group (2.3%, 2,252±685, p =0.013), largely driven by the significantly higher RV incidence (14.0 % versus 2.3 %, p =0.032). Enhancement of CEC was the significant predictor of MACE (hazard ratio: 0.11; 95% CI: 0.013-0.879; p =0.038). Conclusion: A baseline CEC level of more than 1 in patients with CAD brought favorable long-term clinical outcomes, suggesting that CEC is a useful prognostic and therapeutic surrogate for secondary prevention of CAD.