Cargando…
Modified GRAS Score for Prognostic Classification of Adrenocortical Carcinoma: An ENSAT Multicentre Study
Background: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) has an aggressive but heterogeneous behaviour. ENSAT stage and Ki67 proliferation index are used to predict clinical outcome but are limited in distinguishing patients with different risk of disease progress. We aimed to validate the prognostic role of a pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8265895/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvab048.334 |
_version_ | 1783719826153275392 |
---|---|
author | Elhassan, Yasir Altieri, Barbara Berhane, Sarah Cosentini, Deborah Calabrese, Anna Haissaguerre, Magalie Kastelan, Darko Fragoso, Maria C Bertherat, Jerome Baudin, Eric Haak, Harm Boudina, Maria Canu, Letizia Loli, Paola Sherlock, Mark Kimpel, Otilia Marta, Laganà Kroiss, Matthias Arlt, Wiebke Terzolo, Massimo Berruti, Alfredo Deeks, Jonathan Libe, Rossella Fassnacht, Martin Ronchi, Cristina Lucia |
author_facet | Elhassan, Yasir Altieri, Barbara Berhane, Sarah Cosentini, Deborah Calabrese, Anna Haissaguerre, Magalie Kastelan, Darko Fragoso, Maria C Bertherat, Jerome Baudin, Eric Haak, Harm Boudina, Maria Canu, Letizia Loli, Paola Sherlock, Mark Kimpel, Otilia Marta, Laganà Kroiss, Matthias Arlt, Wiebke Terzolo, Massimo Berruti, Alfredo Deeks, Jonathan Libe, Rossella Fassnacht, Martin Ronchi, Cristina Lucia |
author_sort | Elhassan, Yasir |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) has an aggressive but heterogeneous behaviour. ENSAT stage and Ki67 proliferation index are used to predict clinical outcome but are limited in distinguishing patients with different risk of disease progress. We aimed to validate the prognostic role of a previously proposed points-based score (mGRAS) in a large ACC cohort. Methods: We included ACC patients who underwent adrenalectomy between 2010 and 2019, had complete clinical and histopathological data, and did not participate in our previous studies (Libe et al. Ann Oncol 2015; Lippert et al. JCEM 2018). The mGRAS score was calculated as follows: age (<50yr=0; ≥50yr =1), symptoms (no=0; yes=1), ENSAT stage (1–2=0; 3=1; 4=2), resection status (R0=0; RX=1; R1=2; R2=3), and Ki67 (0–9%=0; 10–19%=1; ≥20%=2 points), generating scores from 0 to 9 and four mGRAS groups (scores 0–1, 2–3, 4–5, and 6–9). Progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were the primary and secondary endpoints, respectively. The discriminative performance of mGRAS was investigated using the Harrell’s C-index and Royston-Sauerbrei’s R(2)(D) statistic. Results: A total of 942 ACC patients from 14 ENSAT centres were included (38% men; median age 50yrs (interquartile range 38, 61)). The four mGRAS groups showed superior prognostic discrimination compared to the individual clinical and histological parameters for both PFS and DSS (C-index 0.71, R(2)(D)=0.30 and 0.77, R(2)(D)=0.46, respectively); ENSAT staging was the second best discriminator (C-index 0.67, R(2)(D) 0.21 and 0.72, R(2)(D)=0.35, respectively). An even better prognostic discrimination was observed using the ten mGRAS scores individually (C-index 0.73, R(2)(D)=0.30, and 0.79, R(2)(D)=0.45 for PFS and DSS, respectively). The superiority of mGRAS was confirmed when separately considering patients treated or untreated with adjuvant mitotane (n=481 vs 314). In mitotane-treated patients, the four mGRAS groups showed better performance in predicting PFS than Ki67 index (C-index 0.66, R(2)(D) 0.18 vs C-index 0.62, R(2)(D) 0.12). Conclusion: The prognostic performance of mGRAS is superior to that of ENSAT staging and Ki67. This simple score may guide personalised treatment decisions in patients with ACC, e.g. regarding the need for adjuvant therapy and frequency of monitoring. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8265895 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82658952021-07-09 Modified GRAS Score for Prognostic Classification of Adrenocortical Carcinoma: An ENSAT Multicentre Study Elhassan, Yasir Altieri, Barbara Berhane, Sarah Cosentini, Deborah Calabrese, Anna Haissaguerre, Magalie Kastelan, Darko Fragoso, Maria C Bertherat, Jerome Baudin, Eric Haak, Harm Boudina, Maria Canu, Letizia Loli, Paola Sherlock, Mark Kimpel, Otilia Marta, Laganà Kroiss, Matthias Arlt, Wiebke Terzolo, Massimo Berruti, Alfredo Deeks, Jonathan Libe, Rossella Fassnacht, Martin Ronchi, Cristina Lucia J Endocr Soc Adrenal Background: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) has an aggressive but heterogeneous behaviour. ENSAT stage and Ki67 proliferation index are used to predict clinical outcome but are limited in distinguishing patients with different risk of disease progress. We aimed to validate the prognostic role of a previously proposed points-based score (mGRAS) in a large ACC cohort. Methods: We included ACC patients who underwent adrenalectomy between 2010 and 2019, had complete clinical and histopathological data, and did not participate in our previous studies (Libe et al. Ann Oncol 2015; Lippert et al. JCEM 2018). The mGRAS score was calculated as follows: age (<50yr=0; ≥50yr =1), symptoms (no=0; yes=1), ENSAT stage (1–2=0; 3=1; 4=2), resection status (R0=0; RX=1; R1=2; R2=3), and Ki67 (0–9%=0; 10–19%=1; ≥20%=2 points), generating scores from 0 to 9 and four mGRAS groups (scores 0–1, 2–3, 4–5, and 6–9). Progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were the primary and secondary endpoints, respectively. The discriminative performance of mGRAS was investigated using the Harrell’s C-index and Royston-Sauerbrei’s R(2)(D) statistic. Results: A total of 942 ACC patients from 14 ENSAT centres were included (38% men; median age 50yrs (interquartile range 38, 61)). The four mGRAS groups showed superior prognostic discrimination compared to the individual clinical and histological parameters for both PFS and DSS (C-index 0.71, R(2)(D)=0.30 and 0.77, R(2)(D)=0.46, respectively); ENSAT staging was the second best discriminator (C-index 0.67, R(2)(D) 0.21 and 0.72, R(2)(D)=0.35, respectively). An even better prognostic discrimination was observed using the ten mGRAS scores individually (C-index 0.73, R(2)(D)=0.30, and 0.79, R(2)(D)=0.45 for PFS and DSS, respectively). The superiority of mGRAS was confirmed when separately considering patients treated or untreated with adjuvant mitotane (n=481 vs 314). In mitotane-treated patients, the four mGRAS groups showed better performance in predicting PFS than Ki67 index (C-index 0.66, R(2)(D) 0.18 vs C-index 0.62, R(2)(D) 0.12). Conclusion: The prognostic performance of mGRAS is superior to that of ENSAT staging and Ki67. This simple score may guide personalised treatment decisions in patients with ACC, e.g. regarding the need for adjuvant therapy and frequency of monitoring. Oxford University Press 2021-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8265895/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvab048.334 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Adrenal Elhassan, Yasir Altieri, Barbara Berhane, Sarah Cosentini, Deborah Calabrese, Anna Haissaguerre, Magalie Kastelan, Darko Fragoso, Maria C Bertherat, Jerome Baudin, Eric Haak, Harm Boudina, Maria Canu, Letizia Loli, Paola Sherlock, Mark Kimpel, Otilia Marta, Laganà Kroiss, Matthias Arlt, Wiebke Terzolo, Massimo Berruti, Alfredo Deeks, Jonathan Libe, Rossella Fassnacht, Martin Ronchi, Cristina Lucia Modified GRAS Score for Prognostic Classification of Adrenocortical Carcinoma: An ENSAT Multicentre Study |
title | Modified GRAS Score for Prognostic Classification of Adrenocortical Carcinoma: An ENSAT Multicentre Study |
title_full | Modified GRAS Score for Prognostic Classification of Adrenocortical Carcinoma: An ENSAT Multicentre Study |
title_fullStr | Modified GRAS Score for Prognostic Classification of Adrenocortical Carcinoma: An ENSAT Multicentre Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Modified GRAS Score for Prognostic Classification of Adrenocortical Carcinoma: An ENSAT Multicentre Study |
title_short | Modified GRAS Score for Prognostic Classification of Adrenocortical Carcinoma: An ENSAT Multicentre Study |
title_sort | modified gras score for prognostic classification of adrenocortical carcinoma: an ensat multicentre study |
topic | Adrenal |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8265895/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvab048.334 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elhassanyasir modifiedgrasscoreforprognosticclassificationofadrenocorticalcarcinomaanensatmulticentrestudy AT altieribarbara modifiedgrasscoreforprognosticclassificationofadrenocorticalcarcinomaanensatmulticentrestudy AT berhanesarah modifiedgrasscoreforprognosticclassificationofadrenocorticalcarcinomaanensatmulticentrestudy AT cosentinideborah modifiedgrasscoreforprognosticclassificationofadrenocorticalcarcinomaanensatmulticentrestudy AT calabreseanna modifiedgrasscoreforprognosticclassificationofadrenocorticalcarcinomaanensatmulticentrestudy AT haissaguerremagalie modifiedgrasscoreforprognosticclassificationofadrenocorticalcarcinomaanensatmulticentrestudy AT kastelandarko modifiedgrasscoreforprognosticclassificationofadrenocorticalcarcinomaanensatmulticentrestudy AT fragosomariac modifiedgrasscoreforprognosticclassificationofadrenocorticalcarcinomaanensatmulticentrestudy AT bertheratjerome modifiedgrasscoreforprognosticclassificationofadrenocorticalcarcinomaanensatmulticentrestudy AT baudineric modifiedgrasscoreforprognosticclassificationofadrenocorticalcarcinomaanensatmulticentrestudy AT haakharm modifiedgrasscoreforprognosticclassificationofadrenocorticalcarcinomaanensatmulticentrestudy AT boudinamaria modifiedgrasscoreforprognosticclassificationofadrenocorticalcarcinomaanensatmulticentrestudy AT canuletizia modifiedgrasscoreforprognosticclassificationofadrenocorticalcarcinomaanensatmulticentrestudy AT lolipaola modifiedgrasscoreforprognosticclassificationofadrenocorticalcarcinomaanensatmulticentrestudy AT sherlockmark modifiedgrasscoreforprognosticclassificationofadrenocorticalcarcinomaanensatmulticentrestudy AT kimpelotilia modifiedgrasscoreforprognosticclassificationofadrenocorticalcarcinomaanensatmulticentrestudy AT martalagana modifiedgrasscoreforprognosticclassificationofadrenocorticalcarcinomaanensatmulticentrestudy AT kroissmatthias modifiedgrasscoreforprognosticclassificationofadrenocorticalcarcinomaanensatmulticentrestudy AT arltwiebke modifiedgrasscoreforprognosticclassificationofadrenocorticalcarcinomaanensatmulticentrestudy AT terzolomassimo modifiedgrasscoreforprognosticclassificationofadrenocorticalcarcinomaanensatmulticentrestudy AT berrutialfredo modifiedgrasscoreforprognosticclassificationofadrenocorticalcarcinomaanensatmulticentrestudy AT deeksjonathan modifiedgrasscoreforprognosticclassificationofadrenocorticalcarcinomaanensatmulticentrestudy AT liberossella modifiedgrasscoreforprognosticclassificationofadrenocorticalcarcinomaanensatmulticentrestudy AT fassnachtmartin modifiedgrasscoreforprognosticclassificationofadrenocorticalcarcinomaanensatmulticentrestudy AT ronchicristinalucia modifiedgrasscoreforprognosticclassificationofadrenocorticalcarcinomaanensatmulticentrestudy |