Cargando…
Clinical and economic impact of universal varicella vaccination in Norway: A modeling study
BACKGROUND: Norway has not implemented universal varicella vaccination, despite the considerable clinical and economic burden of varicella disease. METHODS: An existing dynamic transmission model of varicella infection was calibrated to age-specific seroprevalence rates in Norway. Six two-dose vacci...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8266049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34237090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254080 |
_version_ | 1783719861039398912 |
---|---|
author | Pawaskar, Manjiri Burgess, Colleen Pillsbury, Mathew Wisløff, Torbjørn Flem, Elmira |
author_facet | Pawaskar, Manjiri Burgess, Colleen Pillsbury, Mathew Wisløff, Torbjørn Flem, Elmira |
author_sort | Pawaskar, Manjiri |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Norway has not implemented universal varicella vaccination, despite the considerable clinical and economic burden of varicella disease. METHODS: An existing dynamic transmission model of varicella infection was calibrated to age-specific seroprevalence rates in Norway. Six two-dose vaccination strategies were considered, consisting of combinations of two formulations each of a monovalent varicella vaccine (Varivax(®) or Varilrix(®)) and a quadrivalent vaccine against measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (ProQuad(®) or PriorixTetra(®)), with the first dose given with a monovalent vaccine at age 15 months, and the second dose with either a monovalent or quadrivalent vaccine at either 18 months, 7 or 11 years. Costs were considered from the perspectives of both the health care system and society. Quality-adjusted life-years saved and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios relative to no vaccination were calculated. A one-way sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the impact of vaccine efficacy, price, the costs of a lost workday and of inpatient and outpatient care, vaccination coverage, and discount rate. RESULTS: In the absence of varicella vaccination, the annual incidence of natural varicella is estimated to be 1,359 per 100,000 population, and the cumulative numbers of varicella outpatient cases, hospitalizations, and deaths over 50 years are projected to be 1.81 million, 10,161, and 61, respectively. Universal varicella vaccination is projected to reduce the natural varicella incidence rate to 48–59 per 100,000 population, depending on the vaccination strategy, and to reduce varicella outpatient cases, hospitalizations, and deaths by 75–85%, 67–79%, and 75–79%, respectively. All strategies were cost-saving, with the most cost-saving as two doses of Varivax(®) at 15 months and 7 years (payer perspective) and two doses of Varivax(®) at 15 months and 18 months (societal perspective). CONCLUSIONS: All modeled two-dose varicella vaccination strategies are projected to lead to substantial reductions in varicella disease and to be cost saving compared to no vaccination in Norway. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8266049 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82660492021-07-19 Clinical and economic impact of universal varicella vaccination in Norway: A modeling study Pawaskar, Manjiri Burgess, Colleen Pillsbury, Mathew Wisløff, Torbjørn Flem, Elmira PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Norway has not implemented universal varicella vaccination, despite the considerable clinical and economic burden of varicella disease. METHODS: An existing dynamic transmission model of varicella infection was calibrated to age-specific seroprevalence rates in Norway. Six two-dose vaccination strategies were considered, consisting of combinations of two formulations each of a monovalent varicella vaccine (Varivax(®) or Varilrix(®)) and a quadrivalent vaccine against measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (ProQuad(®) or PriorixTetra(®)), with the first dose given with a monovalent vaccine at age 15 months, and the second dose with either a monovalent or quadrivalent vaccine at either 18 months, 7 or 11 years. Costs were considered from the perspectives of both the health care system and society. Quality-adjusted life-years saved and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios relative to no vaccination were calculated. A one-way sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the impact of vaccine efficacy, price, the costs of a lost workday and of inpatient and outpatient care, vaccination coverage, and discount rate. RESULTS: In the absence of varicella vaccination, the annual incidence of natural varicella is estimated to be 1,359 per 100,000 population, and the cumulative numbers of varicella outpatient cases, hospitalizations, and deaths over 50 years are projected to be 1.81 million, 10,161, and 61, respectively. Universal varicella vaccination is projected to reduce the natural varicella incidence rate to 48–59 per 100,000 population, depending on the vaccination strategy, and to reduce varicella outpatient cases, hospitalizations, and deaths by 75–85%, 67–79%, and 75–79%, respectively. All strategies were cost-saving, with the most cost-saving as two doses of Varivax(®) at 15 months and 7 years (payer perspective) and two doses of Varivax(®) at 15 months and 18 months (societal perspective). CONCLUSIONS: All modeled two-dose varicella vaccination strategies are projected to lead to substantial reductions in varicella disease and to be cost saving compared to no vaccination in Norway. Public Library of Science 2021-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8266049/ /pubmed/34237090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254080 Text en © 2021 Pawaskar et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pawaskar, Manjiri Burgess, Colleen Pillsbury, Mathew Wisløff, Torbjørn Flem, Elmira Clinical and economic impact of universal varicella vaccination in Norway: A modeling study |
title | Clinical and economic impact of universal varicella vaccination in Norway: A modeling study |
title_full | Clinical and economic impact of universal varicella vaccination in Norway: A modeling study |
title_fullStr | Clinical and economic impact of universal varicella vaccination in Norway: A modeling study |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical and economic impact of universal varicella vaccination in Norway: A modeling study |
title_short | Clinical and economic impact of universal varicella vaccination in Norway: A modeling study |
title_sort | clinical and economic impact of universal varicella vaccination in norway: a modeling study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8266049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34237090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254080 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pawaskarmanjiri clinicalandeconomicimpactofuniversalvaricellavaccinationinnorwayamodelingstudy AT burgesscolleen clinicalandeconomicimpactofuniversalvaricellavaccinationinnorwayamodelingstudy AT pillsburymathew clinicalandeconomicimpactofuniversalvaricellavaccinationinnorwayamodelingstudy AT wisløfftorbjørn clinicalandeconomicimpactofuniversalvaricellavaccinationinnorwayamodelingstudy AT flemelmira clinicalandeconomicimpactofuniversalvaricellavaccinationinnorwayamodelingstudy |