Cargando…
LEVER SIGN TEST FOR CHRONIC ACL INJURY: A COMPARISON WITH LACHMAN AND ANTERIOR DRAWER TESTS
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the lever sign test in patients with and without chronic Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries in an outpatient setting and the inter-examiner agreement of surgeons with different levels of experience. METHODS: 72 consecut...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
ATHA EDITORA
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8266281/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34290559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220212903238345 |
_version_ | 1783719912474148864 |
---|---|
author | SOBRADO, MARCEL FARACO BONADIO, MARCELO BATISTA RIBEIRO, GABRIEL FERNANDES GIGLIO, PEDRO NOGUEIRA HELITO, CAMILO PARTEZANI DEMANGE, MARCO KAWAMURA |
author_facet | SOBRADO, MARCEL FARACO BONADIO, MARCELO BATISTA RIBEIRO, GABRIEL FERNANDES GIGLIO, PEDRO NOGUEIRA HELITO, CAMILO PARTEZANI DEMANGE, MARCO KAWAMURA |
author_sort | SOBRADO, MARCEL FARACO |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the lever sign test in patients with and without chronic Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries in an outpatient setting and the inter-examiner agreement of surgeons with different levels of experience. METHODS: 72 consecutive patients with a history of previous knee sprains were included. The Lachman, anterior drawer, and Lever Sign tests were performed for all subjects in a randomized order by three blinded raters with different levels of experience. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and inter-rater agreement were estimated for all tests. RESULTS: Among the 72 patients, the prevalence of ACL injuries was 54%. The lever test showed sensitivity of 64.1% (95% CI 0.47-0.78) and specificity of 100% (95% CI 0.87-1.00) for the senior examiner. For the less experienced examiner the sensitivity was 51.8% and the specificity was 93.7%. Positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were 100% and 70.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Lever Sign test shows to be a maneuver of easy execution, with 100% specificity and 100% PPV. Moderate agreement between experienced examiners and low agreement among experienced and inexperienced examiners was found. This test may play a role as an auxiliary maneuver. Level of Evidence I, Diagnostic Studies - Investigating a Diagnostic Test. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8266281 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | ATHA EDITORA |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82662812021-07-20 LEVER SIGN TEST FOR CHRONIC ACL INJURY: A COMPARISON WITH LACHMAN AND ANTERIOR DRAWER TESTS SOBRADO, MARCEL FARACO BONADIO, MARCELO BATISTA RIBEIRO, GABRIEL FERNANDES GIGLIO, PEDRO NOGUEIRA HELITO, CAMILO PARTEZANI DEMANGE, MARCO KAWAMURA Acta Ortop Bras Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the lever sign test in patients with and without chronic Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries in an outpatient setting and the inter-examiner agreement of surgeons with different levels of experience. METHODS: 72 consecutive patients with a history of previous knee sprains were included. The Lachman, anterior drawer, and Lever Sign tests were performed for all subjects in a randomized order by three blinded raters with different levels of experience. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and inter-rater agreement were estimated for all tests. RESULTS: Among the 72 patients, the prevalence of ACL injuries was 54%. The lever test showed sensitivity of 64.1% (95% CI 0.47-0.78) and specificity of 100% (95% CI 0.87-1.00) for the senior examiner. For the less experienced examiner the sensitivity was 51.8% and the specificity was 93.7%. Positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were 100% and 70.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Lever Sign test shows to be a maneuver of easy execution, with 100% specificity and 100% PPV. Moderate agreement between experienced examiners and low agreement among experienced and inexperienced examiners was found. This test may play a role as an auxiliary maneuver. Level of Evidence I, Diagnostic Studies - Investigating a Diagnostic Test. ATHA EDITORA 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8266281/ /pubmed/34290559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220212903238345 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License |
spellingShingle | Original Article SOBRADO, MARCEL FARACO BONADIO, MARCELO BATISTA RIBEIRO, GABRIEL FERNANDES GIGLIO, PEDRO NOGUEIRA HELITO, CAMILO PARTEZANI DEMANGE, MARCO KAWAMURA LEVER SIGN TEST FOR CHRONIC ACL INJURY: A COMPARISON WITH LACHMAN AND ANTERIOR DRAWER TESTS |
title | LEVER SIGN TEST FOR CHRONIC ACL INJURY: A COMPARISON WITH LACHMAN AND ANTERIOR DRAWER TESTS |
title_full | LEVER SIGN TEST FOR CHRONIC ACL INJURY: A COMPARISON WITH LACHMAN AND ANTERIOR DRAWER TESTS |
title_fullStr | LEVER SIGN TEST FOR CHRONIC ACL INJURY: A COMPARISON WITH LACHMAN AND ANTERIOR DRAWER TESTS |
title_full_unstemmed | LEVER SIGN TEST FOR CHRONIC ACL INJURY: A COMPARISON WITH LACHMAN AND ANTERIOR DRAWER TESTS |
title_short | LEVER SIGN TEST FOR CHRONIC ACL INJURY: A COMPARISON WITH LACHMAN AND ANTERIOR DRAWER TESTS |
title_sort | lever sign test for chronic acl injury: a comparison with lachman and anterior drawer tests |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8266281/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34290559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220212903238345 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sobradomarcelfaraco leversigntestforchronicaclinjuryacomparisonwithlachmanandanteriordrawertests AT bonadiomarcelobatista leversigntestforchronicaclinjuryacomparisonwithlachmanandanteriordrawertests AT ribeirogabrielfernandes leversigntestforchronicaclinjuryacomparisonwithlachmanandanteriordrawertests AT gigliopedronogueira leversigntestforchronicaclinjuryacomparisonwithlachmanandanteriordrawertests AT helitocamilopartezani leversigntestforchronicaclinjuryacomparisonwithlachmanandanteriordrawertests AT demangemarcokawamura leversigntestforchronicaclinjuryacomparisonwithlachmanandanteriordrawertests |