Cargando…

LEVER SIGN TEST FOR CHRONIC ACL INJURY: A COMPARISON WITH LACHMAN AND ANTERIOR DRAWER TESTS

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the lever sign test in patients with and without chronic Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries in an outpatient setting and the inter-examiner agreement of surgeons with different levels of experience. METHODS: 72 consecut...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: SOBRADO, MARCEL FARACO, BONADIO, MARCELO BATISTA, RIBEIRO, GABRIEL FERNANDES, GIGLIO, PEDRO NOGUEIRA, HELITO, CAMILO PARTEZANI, DEMANGE, MARCO KAWAMURA
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: ATHA EDITORA 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8266281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34290559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220212903238345
_version_ 1783719912474148864
author SOBRADO, MARCEL FARACO
BONADIO, MARCELO BATISTA
RIBEIRO, GABRIEL FERNANDES
GIGLIO, PEDRO NOGUEIRA
HELITO, CAMILO PARTEZANI
DEMANGE, MARCO KAWAMURA
author_facet SOBRADO, MARCEL FARACO
BONADIO, MARCELO BATISTA
RIBEIRO, GABRIEL FERNANDES
GIGLIO, PEDRO NOGUEIRA
HELITO, CAMILO PARTEZANI
DEMANGE, MARCO KAWAMURA
author_sort SOBRADO, MARCEL FARACO
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the lever sign test in patients with and without chronic Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries in an outpatient setting and the inter-examiner agreement of surgeons with different levels of experience. METHODS: 72 consecutive patients with a history of previous knee sprains were included. The Lachman, anterior drawer, and Lever Sign tests were performed for all subjects in a randomized order by three blinded raters with different levels of experience. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and inter-rater agreement were estimated for all tests. RESULTS: Among the 72 patients, the prevalence of ACL injuries was 54%. The lever test showed sensitivity of 64.1% (95% CI 0.47-0.78) and specificity of 100% (95% CI 0.87-1.00) for the senior examiner. For the less experienced examiner the sensitivity was 51.8% and the specificity was 93.7%. Positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were 100% and 70.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Lever Sign test shows to be a maneuver of easy execution, with 100% specificity and 100% PPV. Moderate agreement between experienced examiners and low agreement among experienced and inexperienced examiners was found. This test may play a role as an auxiliary maneuver. Level of Evidence I, Diagnostic Studies - Investigating a Diagnostic Test.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8266281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher ATHA EDITORA
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82662812021-07-20 LEVER SIGN TEST FOR CHRONIC ACL INJURY: A COMPARISON WITH LACHMAN AND ANTERIOR DRAWER TESTS SOBRADO, MARCEL FARACO BONADIO, MARCELO BATISTA RIBEIRO, GABRIEL FERNANDES GIGLIO, PEDRO NOGUEIRA HELITO, CAMILO PARTEZANI DEMANGE, MARCO KAWAMURA Acta Ortop Bras Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the lever sign test in patients with and without chronic Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries in an outpatient setting and the inter-examiner agreement of surgeons with different levels of experience. METHODS: 72 consecutive patients with a history of previous knee sprains were included. The Lachman, anterior drawer, and Lever Sign tests were performed for all subjects in a randomized order by three blinded raters with different levels of experience. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and inter-rater agreement were estimated for all tests. RESULTS: Among the 72 patients, the prevalence of ACL injuries was 54%. The lever test showed sensitivity of 64.1% (95% CI 0.47-0.78) and specificity of 100% (95% CI 0.87-1.00) for the senior examiner. For the less experienced examiner the sensitivity was 51.8% and the specificity was 93.7%. Positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were 100% and 70.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Lever Sign test shows to be a maneuver of easy execution, with 100% specificity and 100% PPV. Moderate agreement between experienced examiners and low agreement among experienced and inexperienced examiners was found. This test may play a role as an auxiliary maneuver. Level of Evidence I, Diagnostic Studies - Investigating a Diagnostic Test. ATHA EDITORA 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8266281/ /pubmed/34290559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220212903238345 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article
SOBRADO, MARCEL FARACO
BONADIO, MARCELO BATISTA
RIBEIRO, GABRIEL FERNANDES
GIGLIO, PEDRO NOGUEIRA
HELITO, CAMILO PARTEZANI
DEMANGE, MARCO KAWAMURA
LEVER SIGN TEST FOR CHRONIC ACL INJURY: A COMPARISON WITH LACHMAN AND ANTERIOR DRAWER TESTS
title LEVER SIGN TEST FOR CHRONIC ACL INJURY: A COMPARISON WITH LACHMAN AND ANTERIOR DRAWER TESTS
title_full LEVER SIGN TEST FOR CHRONIC ACL INJURY: A COMPARISON WITH LACHMAN AND ANTERIOR DRAWER TESTS
title_fullStr LEVER SIGN TEST FOR CHRONIC ACL INJURY: A COMPARISON WITH LACHMAN AND ANTERIOR DRAWER TESTS
title_full_unstemmed LEVER SIGN TEST FOR CHRONIC ACL INJURY: A COMPARISON WITH LACHMAN AND ANTERIOR DRAWER TESTS
title_short LEVER SIGN TEST FOR CHRONIC ACL INJURY: A COMPARISON WITH LACHMAN AND ANTERIOR DRAWER TESTS
title_sort lever sign test for chronic acl injury: a comparison with lachman and anterior drawer tests
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8266281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34290559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220212903238345
work_keys_str_mv AT sobradomarcelfaraco leversigntestforchronicaclinjuryacomparisonwithlachmanandanteriordrawertests
AT bonadiomarcelobatista leversigntestforchronicaclinjuryacomparisonwithlachmanandanteriordrawertests
AT ribeirogabrielfernandes leversigntestforchronicaclinjuryacomparisonwithlachmanandanteriordrawertests
AT gigliopedronogueira leversigntestforchronicaclinjuryacomparisonwithlachmanandanteriordrawertests
AT helitocamilopartezani leversigntestforchronicaclinjuryacomparisonwithlachmanandanteriordrawertests
AT demangemarcokawamura leversigntestforchronicaclinjuryacomparisonwithlachmanandanteriordrawertests