Cargando…

Reduction of Lipid-Core Burden Index in Nonculprit Lesions at Follow-Up after ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Study of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold versus Optimal Medical Therapy

BACKGROUND: Non-flow-limiting nonculprit lesions (NCL) that contain a large lipid-rich necrotic core (nonculprit lipid-rich plaques (NC-LRP)) are most likely to cause recurrent acute coronary syndrome after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) detects LRPs us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kefer, Joelle, Chenu, Patrick, Gurné, Olivier, Maes, Frederic, Tamakloé, Théophile, Beauloye, Christophe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8266479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34290573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5590093
_version_ 1783719956124270592
author Kefer, Joelle
Chenu, Patrick
Gurné, Olivier
Maes, Frederic
Tamakloé, Théophile
Beauloye, Christophe
author_facet Kefer, Joelle
Chenu, Patrick
Gurné, Olivier
Maes, Frederic
Tamakloé, Théophile
Beauloye, Christophe
author_sort Kefer, Joelle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Non-flow-limiting nonculprit lesions (NCL) that contain a large lipid-rich necrotic core (nonculprit lipid-rich plaques (NC-LRP)) are most likely to cause recurrent acute coronary syndrome after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) detects LRPs using the maximum 4 mm lipid-core burden index (maxLCBI(4 mm)). Few data are available regarding NIRS-guided therapy of these NC-LRPs, which are a potential target for preventive stenting. Bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) provides local drug delivery and could facilitate plaque passivation after resorption. This study sought to assess the safety of BVS implantation in NC-LRPs and its efficacy in reducing maxLCBI(4 mm) at 2-year follow-up after STEMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: In total, 33 non-flow-limiting NCLs from 29 STEMI patients were included in this study. Of these, 15 were LRPs and were randomly assigned to either the BVS + optimal medical therapy (OMT) arm (group 1; N = 7) or the OMT arm (group 2; N = 8). At baseline, there were no differences in plaque characteristics between groups (fractional flow reserve: 0.85 ± 0.04 vs. 0.89 ± 0.06; diameter stenosis (DS): 43.4 ± 8 vs. 40.1 ± 10.7%; plaque burden 54.98 ± 5.8 vs. 49.76 ± 8.31%; and maxLCBI(4 mm) 402 [348; 564] vs. 373 [298; 516]; p=NS for all comparisons between groups 1 and 2, respectively). Seven BVSs were implanted 3 ± 1 days after STEMI in six patients, without complications. At angiographic follow-up (712 [657; 740] days), a significant and similar reduction of maxLCBI(4 mm) was observed in both groups, with a median change of 306 [257; 377] in group 1 vs. 300 [278; 346] in group 2 (p=0.44). DS was significantly lower in group 1 vs. group 2 (19.8 ± 7 vs. 41.7 ± 13%, p=0.003), while plaque burden remained unchanged in both groups. Overall survival was 100%, target lesion failure was 13%, and stent thrombosis was 0%. CONCLUSIONS: BVS + OMT and OMT appear as similarly safe and effective in reducing maxLCBI(4mm) in NC-LRPs at 2-year follow-up after STEMI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8266479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82664792021-07-20 Reduction of Lipid-Core Burden Index in Nonculprit Lesions at Follow-Up after ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Study of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold versus Optimal Medical Therapy Kefer, Joelle Chenu, Patrick Gurné, Olivier Maes, Frederic Tamakloé, Théophile Beauloye, Christophe J Interv Cardiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Non-flow-limiting nonculprit lesions (NCL) that contain a large lipid-rich necrotic core (nonculprit lipid-rich plaques (NC-LRP)) are most likely to cause recurrent acute coronary syndrome after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) detects LRPs using the maximum 4 mm lipid-core burden index (maxLCBI(4 mm)). Few data are available regarding NIRS-guided therapy of these NC-LRPs, which are a potential target for preventive stenting. Bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) provides local drug delivery and could facilitate plaque passivation after resorption. This study sought to assess the safety of BVS implantation in NC-LRPs and its efficacy in reducing maxLCBI(4 mm) at 2-year follow-up after STEMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: In total, 33 non-flow-limiting NCLs from 29 STEMI patients were included in this study. Of these, 15 were LRPs and were randomly assigned to either the BVS + optimal medical therapy (OMT) arm (group 1; N = 7) or the OMT arm (group 2; N = 8). At baseline, there were no differences in plaque characteristics between groups (fractional flow reserve: 0.85 ± 0.04 vs. 0.89 ± 0.06; diameter stenosis (DS): 43.4 ± 8 vs. 40.1 ± 10.7%; plaque burden 54.98 ± 5.8 vs. 49.76 ± 8.31%; and maxLCBI(4 mm) 402 [348; 564] vs. 373 [298; 516]; p=NS for all comparisons between groups 1 and 2, respectively). Seven BVSs were implanted 3 ± 1 days after STEMI in six patients, without complications. At angiographic follow-up (712 [657; 740] days), a significant and similar reduction of maxLCBI(4 mm) was observed in both groups, with a median change of 306 [257; 377] in group 1 vs. 300 [278; 346] in group 2 (p=0.44). DS was significantly lower in group 1 vs. group 2 (19.8 ± 7 vs. 41.7 ± 13%, p=0.003), while plaque burden remained unchanged in both groups. Overall survival was 100%, target lesion failure was 13%, and stent thrombosis was 0%. CONCLUSIONS: BVS + OMT and OMT appear as similarly safe and effective in reducing maxLCBI(4mm) in NC-LRPs at 2-year follow-up after STEMI. Hindawi 2021-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8266479/ /pubmed/34290573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5590093 Text en Copyright © 2021 Joelle Kefer et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kefer, Joelle
Chenu, Patrick
Gurné, Olivier
Maes, Frederic
Tamakloé, Théophile
Beauloye, Christophe
Reduction of Lipid-Core Burden Index in Nonculprit Lesions at Follow-Up after ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Study of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold versus Optimal Medical Therapy
title Reduction of Lipid-Core Burden Index in Nonculprit Lesions at Follow-Up after ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Study of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold versus Optimal Medical Therapy
title_full Reduction of Lipid-Core Burden Index in Nonculprit Lesions at Follow-Up after ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Study of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold versus Optimal Medical Therapy
title_fullStr Reduction of Lipid-Core Burden Index in Nonculprit Lesions at Follow-Up after ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Study of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold versus Optimal Medical Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Reduction of Lipid-Core Burden Index in Nonculprit Lesions at Follow-Up after ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Study of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold versus Optimal Medical Therapy
title_short Reduction of Lipid-Core Burden Index in Nonculprit Lesions at Follow-Up after ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Study of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold versus Optimal Medical Therapy
title_sort reduction of lipid-core burden index in nonculprit lesions at follow-up after st-elevation myocardial infarction: a randomized study of bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus optimal medical therapy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8266479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34290573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5590093
work_keys_str_mv AT keferjoelle reductionoflipidcoreburdenindexinnonculpritlesionsatfollowupafterstelevationmyocardialinfarctionarandomizedstudyofbioresorbablevascularscaffoldversusoptimalmedicaltherapy
AT chenupatrick reductionoflipidcoreburdenindexinnonculpritlesionsatfollowupafterstelevationmyocardialinfarctionarandomizedstudyofbioresorbablevascularscaffoldversusoptimalmedicaltherapy
AT gurneolivier reductionoflipidcoreburdenindexinnonculpritlesionsatfollowupafterstelevationmyocardialinfarctionarandomizedstudyofbioresorbablevascularscaffoldversusoptimalmedicaltherapy
AT maesfrederic reductionoflipidcoreburdenindexinnonculpritlesionsatfollowupafterstelevationmyocardialinfarctionarandomizedstudyofbioresorbablevascularscaffoldversusoptimalmedicaltherapy
AT tamakloetheophile reductionoflipidcoreburdenindexinnonculpritlesionsatfollowupafterstelevationmyocardialinfarctionarandomizedstudyofbioresorbablevascularscaffoldversusoptimalmedicaltherapy
AT beauloyechristophe reductionoflipidcoreburdenindexinnonculpritlesionsatfollowupafterstelevationmyocardialinfarctionarandomizedstudyofbioresorbablevascularscaffoldversusoptimalmedicaltherapy