Cargando…

Performance of the GRACE 2.0 score in patients with type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction

AIMS: The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score was developed to evaluate risk in patients with myocardial infarction. However, its performance in type 2 myocardial infarction is uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: In two cohorts of consecutive patients with suspected acute coronary syn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hung, John, Roos, Andreas, Kadesjö, Erik, McAllister, David A, Kimenai, Dorien M, Shah, Anoop S V, Anand, Atul, Strachan, Fiona E, Fox, Keith A A, Mills, Nicholas L, Chapman, Andrew R, Holzmann, Martin J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8266602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32516805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa375
_version_ 1783719977798336512
author Hung, John
Roos, Andreas
Kadesjö, Erik
McAllister, David A
Kimenai, Dorien M
Shah, Anoop S V
Anand, Atul
Strachan, Fiona E
Fox, Keith A A
Mills, Nicholas L
Chapman, Andrew R
Holzmann, Martin J
author_facet Hung, John
Roos, Andreas
Kadesjö, Erik
McAllister, David A
Kimenai, Dorien M
Shah, Anoop S V
Anand, Atul
Strachan, Fiona E
Fox, Keith A A
Mills, Nicholas L
Chapman, Andrew R
Holzmann, Martin J
author_sort Hung, John
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score was developed to evaluate risk in patients with myocardial infarction. However, its performance in type 2 myocardial infarction is uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: In two cohorts of consecutive patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome from 10 hospitals in Scotland (n = 48 282) and a tertiary care hospital in Sweden (n = 22 589), we calculated the GRACE 2.0 score to estimate death at 1 year. Discrimination was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), and compared for those with an adjudicated diagnosis of type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction using DeLong’s test. Type 1 myocardial infarction was diagnosed in 4981 (10%) and 1080 (5%) patients in Scotland and Sweden, respectively. At 1 year, 720 (15%) and 112 (10%) patients died with an AUC for the GRACE 2.0 score of 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82–0.85] and 0.85 (95% CI 0.81–0.89). Type 2 myocardial infarction occurred in 1121 (2%) and 247 (1%) patients in Scotland and Sweden, respectively, with 258 (23%) and 57 (23%) deaths at 1 year. The AUC was 0.73 (95% CI 0.70–0.77) and 0.73 (95% CI 0.66–0.81) in type 2 myocardial infarction, which was lower than for type 1 myocardial infarction in both cohorts (P < 0.001 and P = 0.008, respectively). CONCLUSION: The GRACE 2.0 score provided good discrimination for all-cause death at 1 year in patients with type 1 myocardial infarction, and moderate discrimination for those with type 2 myocardial infarction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01852123.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8266602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82666022021-07-09 Performance of the GRACE 2.0 score in patients with type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction Hung, John Roos, Andreas Kadesjö, Erik McAllister, David A Kimenai, Dorien M Shah, Anoop S V Anand, Atul Strachan, Fiona E Fox, Keith A A Mills, Nicholas L Chapman, Andrew R Holzmann, Martin J Eur Heart J Clinical Research AIMS: The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score was developed to evaluate risk in patients with myocardial infarction. However, its performance in type 2 myocardial infarction is uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: In two cohorts of consecutive patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome from 10 hospitals in Scotland (n = 48 282) and a tertiary care hospital in Sweden (n = 22 589), we calculated the GRACE 2.0 score to estimate death at 1 year. Discrimination was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), and compared for those with an adjudicated diagnosis of type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction using DeLong’s test. Type 1 myocardial infarction was diagnosed in 4981 (10%) and 1080 (5%) patients in Scotland and Sweden, respectively. At 1 year, 720 (15%) and 112 (10%) patients died with an AUC for the GRACE 2.0 score of 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82–0.85] and 0.85 (95% CI 0.81–0.89). Type 2 myocardial infarction occurred in 1121 (2%) and 247 (1%) patients in Scotland and Sweden, respectively, with 258 (23%) and 57 (23%) deaths at 1 year. The AUC was 0.73 (95% CI 0.70–0.77) and 0.73 (95% CI 0.66–0.81) in type 2 myocardial infarction, which was lower than for type 1 myocardial infarction in both cohorts (P < 0.001 and P = 0.008, respectively). CONCLUSION: The GRACE 2.0 score provided good discrimination for all-cause death at 1 year in patients with type 1 myocardial infarction, and moderate discrimination for those with type 2 myocardial infarction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01852123. Oxford University Press 2020-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8266602/ /pubmed/32516805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa375 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Hung, John
Roos, Andreas
Kadesjö, Erik
McAllister, David A
Kimenai, Dorien M
Shah, Anoop S V
Anand, Atul
Strachan, Fiona E
Fox, Keith A A
Mills, Nicholas L
Chapman, Andrew R
Holzmann, Martin J
Performance of the GRACE 2.0 score in patients with type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction
title Performance of the GRACE 2.0 score in patients with type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction
title_full Performance of the GRACE 2.0 score in patients with type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction
title_fullStr Performance of the GRACE 2.0 score in patients with type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction
title_full_unstemmed Performance of the GRACE 2.0 score in patients with type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction
title_short Performance of the GRACE 2.0 score in patients with type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction
title_sort performance of the grace 2.0 score in patients with type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8266602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32516805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa375
work_keys_str_mv AT hungjohn performanceofthegrace20scoreinpatientswithtype1andtype2myocardialinfarction
AT roosandreas performanceofthegrace20scoreinpatientswithtype1andtype2myocardialinfarction
AT kadesjoerik performanceofthegrace20scoreinpatientswithtype1andtype2myocardialinfarction
AT mcallisterdavida performanceofthegrace20scoreinpatientswithtype1andtype2myocardialinfarction
AT kimenaidorienm performanceofthegrace20scoreinpatientswithtype1andtype2myocardialinfarction
AT shahanoopsv performanceofthegrace20scoreinpatientswithtype1andtype2myocardialinfarction
AT anandatul performanceofthegrace20scoreinpatientswithtype1andtype2myocardialinfarction
AT strachanfionae performanceofthegrace20scoreinpatientswithtype1andtype2myocardialinfarction
AT foxkeithaa performanceofthegrace20scoreinpatientswithtype1andtype2myocardialinfarction
AT millsnicholasl performanceofthegrace20scoreinpatientswithtype1andtype2myocardialinfarction
AT chapmanandrewr performanceofthegrace20scoreinpatientswithtype1andtype2myocardialinfarction
AT holzmannmartinj performanceofthegrace20scoreinpatientswithtype1andtype2myocardialinfarction