Cargando…

Intraoral ultrasonography in the assessment of DOI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a comparison with magnetic resonance and histopathology

OBJECTIVE: The first-line therapeutic approach for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is complete surgical resection. Preoperative assessment of depth of invasion (cDOI) is crucial to plan the surgery. Magnetic resonance (MR) and intraoral ultrasonography (IOUS) have been shown to be useful...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Filauro, Marta, Missale, Francesco, Marchi, Filippo, Iandelli, Andrea, Carobbio, Andrea Luigi Camillo, Mazzola, Francesco, Parrinello, Giampiero, Barabino, Emanuele, Cittadini, Giuseppe, Farina, Davide, Piazza, Cesare, Peretti, Giorgio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8266699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33084951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06421-w
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The first-line therapeutic approach for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is complete surgical resection. Preoperative assessment of depth of invasion (cDOI) is crucial to plan the surgery. Magnetic resonance (MR) and intraoral ultrasonography (IOUS) have been shown to be useful tools for assessment of DOI. The present analysis investigates the accuracy of MR and IOUS in evaluating DOI in OCSCC compared to histological evaluation (pDOI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine previously untreated patients with cT1-T3 OCSCC were reviewed. Nine patients were staged with MR alone, 10 with IOUS alone, and 30 with both MR and IOUS. RESULTS: Mean difference between cDOI(MR) and pDOI values of 0.2 mm (95% CI − 1.0–1.3 mm) and between cDOI(IOUS) and pDOI of 0.3 mm (95% CI − 1.0–1.6 mm). Spearman R between cDOI(MR) and pDOI was R = 0.83 and between cDOI(IOUS) and pDOI was R = 0.76. Both radiological techniques showed high performance for the correct identification, with the optimum cut-off of 5 mm, of patients with a pDOI ≥ 4 mm and amenable to a neck dissection, with an AUC of 0.92 and 0.82 for MR and IOUS, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both examinations were valid approaches for preoperative determination of DOI in OCSCC, although with different cost-effectiveness profiles and indications. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00405-020-06421-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.