Cargando…

Intraoral ultrasonography in the assessment of DOI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a comparison with magnetic resonance and histopathology

OBJECTIVE: The first-line therapeutic approach for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is complete surgical resection. Preoperative assessment of depth of invasion (cDOI) is crucial to plan the surgery. Magnetic resonance (MR) and intraoral ultrasonography (IOUS) have been shown to be useful...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Filauro, Marta, Missale, Francesco, Marchi, Filippo, Iandelli, Andrea, Carobbio, Andrea Luigi Camillo, Mazzola, Francesco, Parrinello, Giampiero, Barabino, Emanuele, Cittadini, Giuseppe, Farina, Davide, Piazza, Cesare, Peretti, Giorgio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8266699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33084951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06421-w
_version_ 1783719994183385088
author Filauro, Marta
Missale, Francesco
Marchi, Filippo
Iandelli, Andrea
Carobbio, Andrea Luigi Camillo
Mazzola, Francesco
Parrinello, Giampiero
Barabino, Emanuele
Cittadini, Giuseppe
Farina, Davide
Piazza, Cesare
Peretti, Giorgio
author_facet Filauro, Marta
Missale, Francesco
Marchi, Filippo
Iandelli, Andrea
Carobbio, Andrea Luigi Camillo
Mazzola, Francesco
Parrinello, Giampiero
Barabino, Emanuele
Cittadini, Giuseppe
Farina, Davide
Piazza, Cesare
Peretti, Giorgio
author_sort Filauro, Marta
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The first-line therapeutic approach for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is complete surgical resection. Preoperative assessment of depth of invasion (cDOI) is crucial to plan the surgery. Magnetic resonance (MR) and intraoral ultrasonography (IOUS) have been shown to be useful tools for assessment of DOI. The present analysis investigates the accuracy of MR and IOUS in evaluating DOI in OCSCC compared to histological evaluation (pDOI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine previously untreated patients with cT1-T3 OCSCC were reviewed. Nine patients were staged with MR alone, 10 with IOUS alone, and 30 with both MR and IOUS. RESULTS: Mean difference between cDOI(MR) and pDOI values of 0.2 mm (95% CI − 1.0–1.3 mm) and between cDOI(IOUS) and pDOI of 0.3 mm (95% CI − 1.0–1.6 mm). Spearman R between cDOI(MR) and pDOI was R = 0.83 and between cDOI(IOUS) and pDOI was R = 0.76. Both radiological techniques showed high performance for the correct identification, with the optimum cut-off of 5 mm, of patients with a pDOI ≥ 4 mm and amenable to a neck dissection, with an AUC of 0.92 and 0.82 for MR and IOUS, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both examinations were valid approaches for preoperative determination of DOI in OCSCC, although with different cost-effectiveness profiles and indications. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00405-020-06421-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8266699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82666992021-07-20 Intraoral ultrasonography in the assessment of DOI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a comparison with magnetic resonance and histopathology Filauro, Marta Missale, Francesco Marchi, Filippo Iandelli, Andrea Carobbio, Andrea Luigi Camillo Mazzola, Francesco Parrinello, Giampiero Barabino, Emanuele Cittadini, Giuseppe Farina, Davide Piazza, Cesare Peretti, Giorgio Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Head and Neck OBJECTIVE: The first-line therapeutic approach for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is complete surgical resection. Preoperative assessment of depth of invasion (cDOI) is crucial to plan the surgery. Magnetic resonance (MR) and intraoral ultrasonography (IOUS) have been shown to be useful tools for assessment of DOI. The present analysis investigates the accuracy of MR and IOUS in evaluating DOI in OCSCC compared to histological evaluation (pDOI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine previously untreated patients with cT1-T3 OCSCC were reviewed. Nine patients were staged with MR alone, 10 with IOUS alone, and 30 with both MR and IOUS. RESULTS: Mean difference between cDOI(MR) and pDOI values of 0.2 mm (95% CI − 1.0–1.3 mm) and between cDOI(IOUS) and pDOI of 0.3 mm (95% CI − 1.0–1.6 mm). Spearman R between cDOI(MR) and pDOI was R = 0.83 and between cDOI(IOUS) and pDOI was R = 0.76. Both radiological techniques showed high performance for the correct identification, with the optimum cut-off of 5 mm, of patients with a pDOI ≥ 4 mm and amenable to a neck dissection, with an AUC of 0.92 and 0.82 for MR and IOUS, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both examinations were valid approaches for preoperative determination of DOI in OCSCC, although with different cost-effectiveness profiles and indications. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00405-020-06421-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-10-21 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8266699/ /pubmed/33084951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06421-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Head and Neck
Filauro, Marta
Missale, Francesco
Marchi, Filippo
Iandelli, Andrea
Carobbio, Andrea Luigi Camillo
Mazzola, Francesco
Parrinello, Giampiero
Barabino, Emanuele
Cittadini, Giuseppe
Farina, Davide
Piazza, Cesare
Peretti, Giorgio
Intraoral ultrasonography in the assessment of DOI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a comparison with magnetic resonance and histopathology
title Intraoral ultrasonography in the assessment of DOI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a comparison with magnetic resonance and histopathology
title_full Intraoral ultrasonography in the assessment of DOI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a comparison with magnetic resonance and histopathology
title_fullStr Intraoral ultrasonography in the assessment of DOI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a comparison with magnetic resonance and histopathology
title_full_unstemmed Intraoral ultrasonography in the assessment of DOI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a comparison with magnetic resonance and histopathology
title_short Intraoral ultrasonography in the assessment of DOI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a comparison with magnetic resonance and histopathology
title_sort intraoral ultrasonography in the assessment of doi in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a comparison with magnetic resonance and histopathology
topic Head and Neck
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8266699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33084951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06421-w
work_keys_str_mv AT filauromarta intraoralultrasonographyintheassessmentofdoiinoralcavitysquamouscellcarcinomaacomparisonwithmagneticresonanceandhistopathology
AT missalefrancesco intraoralultrasonographyintheassessmentofdoiinoralcavitysquamouscellcarcinomaacomparisonwithmagneticresonanceandhistopathology
AT marchifilippo intraoralultrasonographyintheassessmentofdoiinoralcavitysquamouscellcarcinomaacomparisonwithmagneticresonanceandhistopathology
AT iandelliandrea intraoralultrasonographyintheassessmentofdoiinoralcavitysquamouscellcarcinomaacomparisonwithmagneticresonanceandhistopathology
AT carobbioandrealuigicamillo intraoralultrasonographyintheassessmentofdoiinoralcavitysquamouscellcarcinomaacomparisonwithmagneticresonanceandhistopathology
AT mazzolafrancesco intraoralultrasonographyintheassessmentofdoiinoralcavitysquamouscellcarcinomaacomparisonwithmagneticresonanceandhistopathology
AT parrinellogiampiero intraoralultrasonographyintheassessmentofdoiinoralcavitysquamouscellcarcinomaacomparisonwithmagneticresonanceandhistopathology
AT barabinoemanuele intraoralultrasonographyintheassessmentofdoiinoralcavitysquamouscellcarcinomaacomparisonwithmagneticresonanceandhistopathology
AT cittadinigiuseppe intraoralultrasonographyintheassessmentofdoiinoralcavitysquamouscellcarcinomaacomparisonwithmagneticresonanceandhistopathology
AT farinadavide intraoralultrasonographyintheassessmentofdoiinoralcavitysquamouscellcarcinomaacomparisonwithmagneticresonanceandhistopathology
AT piazzacesare intraoralultrasonographyintheassessmentofdoiinoralcavitysquamouscellcarcinomaacomparisonwithmagneticresonanceandhistopathology
AT perettigiorgio intraoralultrasonographyintheassessmentofdoiinoralcavitysquamouscellcarcinomaacomparisonwithmagneticresonanceandhistopathology