Cargando…
Intraoral ultrasonography in the assessment of DOI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a comparison with magnetic resonance and histopathology
OBJECTIVE: The first-line therapeutic approach for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is complete surgical resection. Preoperative assessment of depth of invasion (cDOI) is crucial to plan the surgery. Magnetic resonance (MR) and intraoral ultrasonography (IOUS) have been shown to be useful...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8266699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33084951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06421-w |
_version_ | 1783719994183385088 |
---|---|
author | Filauro, Marta Missale, Francesco Marchi, Filippo Iandelli, Andrea Carobbio, Andrea Luigi Camillo Mazzola, Francesco Parrinello, Giampiero Barabino, Emanuele Cittadini, Giuseppe Farina, Davide Piazza, Cesare Peretti, Giorgio |
author_facet | Filauro, Marta Missale, Francesco Marchi, Filippo Iandelli, Andrea Carobbio, Andrea Luigi Camillo Mazzola, Francesco Parrinello, Giampiero Barabino, Emanuele Cittadini, Giuseppe Farina, Davide Piazza, Cesare Peretti, Giorgio |
author_sort | Filauro, Marta |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The first-line therapeutic approach for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is complete surgical resection. Preoperative assessment of depth of invasion (cDOI) is crucial to plan the surgery. Magnetic resonance (MR) and intraoral ultrasonography (IOUS) have been shown to be useful tools for assessment of DOI. The present analysis investigates the accuracy of MR and IOUS in evaluating DOI in OCSCC compared to histological evaluation (pDOI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine previously untreated patients with cT1-T3 OCSCC were reviewed. Nine patients were staged with MR alone, 10 with IOUS alone, and 30 with both MR and IOUS. RESULTS: Mean difference between cDOI(MR) and pDOI values of 0.2 mm (95% CI − 1.0–1.3 mm) and between cDOI(IOUS) and pDOI of 0.3 mm (95% CI − 1.0–1.6 mm). Spearman R between cDOI(MR) and pDOI was R = 0.83 and between cDOI(IOUS) and pDOI was R = 0.76. Both radiological techniques showed high performance for the correct identification, with the optimum cut-off of 5 mm, of patients with a pDOI ≥ 4 mm and amenable to a neck dissection, with an AUC of 0.92 and 0.82 for MR and IOUS, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both examinations were valid approaches for preoperative determination of DOI in OCSCC, although with different cost-effectiveness profiles and indications. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00405-020-06421-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8266699 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82666992021-07-20 Intraoral ultrasonography in the assessment of DOI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a comparison with magnetic resonance and histopathology Filauro, Marta Missale, Francesco Marchi, Filippo Iandelli, Andrea Carobbio, Andrea Luigi Camillo Mazzola, Francesco Parrinello, Giampiero Barabino, Emanuele Cittadini, Giuseppe Farina, Davide Piazza, Cesare Peretti, Giorgio Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Head and Neck OBJECTIVE: The first-line therapeutic approach for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is complete surgical resection. Preoperative assessment of depth of invasion (cDOI) is crucial to plan the surgery. Magnetic resonance (MR) and intraoral ultrasonography (IOUS) have been shown to be useful tools for assessment of DOI. The present analysis investigates the accuracy of MR and IOUS in evaluating DOI in OCSCC compared to histological evaluation (pDOI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine previously untreated patients with cT1-T3 OCSCC were reviewed. Nine patients were staged with MR alone, 10 with IOUS alone, and 30 with both MR and IOUS. RESULTS: Mean difference between cDOI(MR) and pDOI values of 0.2 mm (95% CI − 1.0–1.3 mm) and between cDOI(IOUS) and pDOI of 0.3 mm (95% CI − 1.0–1.6 mm). Spearman R between cDOI(MR) and pDOI was R = 0.83 and between cDOI(IOUS) and pDOI was R = 0.76. Both radiological techniques showed high performance for the correct identification, with the optimum cut-off of 5 mm, of patients with a pDOI ≥ 4 mm and amenable to a neck dissection, with an AUC of 0.92 and 0.82 for MR and IOUS, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both examinations were valid approaches for preoperative determination of DOI in OCSCC, although with different cost-effectiveness profiles and indications. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00405-020-06421-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-10-21 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8266699/ /pubmed/33084951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06421-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Head and Neck Filauro, Marta Missale, Francesco Marchi, Filippo Iandelli, Andrea Carobbio, Andrea Luigi Camillo Mazzola, Francesco Parrinello, Giampiero Barabino, Emanuele Cittadini, Giuseppe Farina, Davide Piazza, Cesare Peretti, Giorgio Intraoral ultrasonography in the assessment of DOI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a comparison with magnetic resonance and histopathology |
title | Intraoral ultrasonography in the assessment of DOI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a comparison with magnetic resonance and histopathology |
title_full | Intraoral ultrasonography in the assessment of DOI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a comparison with magnetic resonance and histopathology |
title_fullStr | Intraoral ultrasonography in the assessment of DOI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a comparison with magnetic resonance and histopathology |
title_full_unstemmed | Intraoral ultrasonography in the assessment of DOI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a comparison with magnetic resonance and histopathology |
title_short | Intraoral ultrasonography in the assessment of DOI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a comparison with magnetic resonance and histopathology |
title_sort | intraoral ultrasonography in the assessment of doi in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a comparison with magnetic resonance and histopathology |
topic | Head and Neck |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8266699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33084951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06421-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT filauromarta intraoralultrasonographyintheassessmentofdoiinoralcavitysquamouscellcarcinomaacomparisonwithmagneticresonanceandhistopathology AT missalefrancesco intraoralultrasonographyintheassessmentofdoiinoralcavitysquamouscellcarcinomaacomparisonwithmagneticresonanceandhistopathology AT marchifilippo intraoralultrasonographyintheassessmentofdoiinoralcavitysquamouscellcarcinomaacomparisonwithmagneticresonanceandhistopathology AT iandelliandrea intraoralultrasonographyintheassessmentofdoiinoralcavitysquamouscellcarcinomaacomparisonwithmagneticresonanceandhistopathology AT carobbioandrealuigicamillo intraoralultrasonographyintheassessmentofdoiinoralcavitysquamouscellcarcinomaacomparisonwithmagneticresonanceandhistopathology AT mazzolafrancesco intraoralultrasonographyintheassessmentofdoiinoralcavitysquamouscellcarcinomaacomparisonwithmagneticresonanceandhistopathology AT parrinellogiampiero intraoralultrasonographyintheassessmentofdoiinoralcavitysquamouscellcarcinomaacomparisonwithmagneticresonanceandhistopathology AT barabinoemanuele intraoralultrasonographyintheassessmentofdoiinoralcavitysquamouscellcarcinomaacomparisonwithmagneticresonanceandhistopathology AT cittadinigiuseppe intraoralultrasonographyintheassessmentofdoiinoralcavitysquamouscellcarcinomaacomparisonwithmagneticresonanceandhistopathology AT farinadavide intraoralultrasonographyintheassessmentofdoiinoralcavitysquamouscellcarcinomaacomparisonwithmagneticresonanceandhistopathology AT piazzacesare intraoralultrasonographyintheassessmentofdoiinoralcavitysquamouscellcarcinomaacomparisonwithmagneticresonanceandhistopathology AT perettigiorgio intraoralultrasonographyintheassessmentofdoiinoralcavitysquamouscellcarcinomaacomparisonwithmagneticresonanceandhistopathology |