Cargando…

Evaluation of a curved surgical prototype in a human larynx

PURPOSE: It is not always possible to create linear access to the larynx using a rigid operating laryngoscope for microlaryngoscopy. In this study, we evaluate the usability of a novel curved surgical prototype with flexible instruments for the larynx (sMAC) in a simulation dummy and human body dono...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schild, L. R., Boehm, F., Kienle, L., Seitz, A., Kahrs, L. A., Boeckers, T. M., Greve, J., Hoffmann, T. K., Schuler, P. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8266771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33885971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06791-9
_version_ 1783720000350060544
author Schild, L. R.
Boehm, F.
Kienle, L.
Seitz, A.
Kahrs, L. A.
Boeckers, T. M.
Greve, J.
Hoffmann, T. K.
Schuler, P. J.
author_facet Schild, L. R.
Boehm, F.
Kienle, L.
Seitz, A.
Kahrs, L. A.
Boeckers, T. M.
Greve, J.
Hoffmann, T. K.
Schuler, P. J.
author_sort Schild, L. R.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: It is not always possible to create linear access to the larynx using a rigid operating laryngoscope for microlaryngoscopy. In this study, we evaluate the usability of a novel curved surgical prototype with flexible instruments for the larynx (sMAC) in a simulation dummy and human body donor. METHODS: In a user study (n = 6), head and neck surgeons as well as medical students tested the system for visualization quality and accessibility of laryngeal landmarks on an intubation dummy and human cadaver. A biopsy of the epiglottis was taken from the body donor. Photographic and time documentation was carried out. RESULTS: The sMAC system demonstrated general feasibility for laryngeal surgery. Unlike conventional microlaryngoscopy, all landmarks could be visualized and manipulated in both setups. Biopsy removal was possible. Visibility of the surgical field remained largely unobstructed even with an endotracheal tube in place. Overall handling of the sMAC prototype was satisfactorily feasible at all times. CONCLUSION: The sMAC system could offer an alternative for patients, where microlaryngoscopy is not applicable. A clinical trial has to clarify if the system benefits in clinical routine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8266771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82667712021-07-20 Evaluation of a curved surgical prototype in a human larynx Schild, L. R. Boehm, F. Kienle, L. Seitz, A. Kahrs, L. A. Boeckers, T. M. Greve, J. Hoffmann, T. K. Schuler, P. J. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Laryngology PURPOSE: It is not always possible to create linear access to the larynx using a rigid operating laryngoscope for microlaryngoscopy. In this study, we evaluate the usability of a novel curved surgical prototype with flexible instruments for the larynx (sMAC) in a simulation dummy and human body donor. METHODS: In a user study (n = 6), head and neck surgeons as well as medical students tested the system for visualization quality and accessibility of laryngeal landmarks on an intubation dummy and human cadaver. A biopsy of the epiglottis was taken from the body donor. Photographic and time documentation was carried out. RESULTS: The sMAC system demonstrated general feasibility for laryngeal surgery. Unlike conventional microlaryngoscopy, all landmarks could be visualized and manipulated in both setups. Biopsy removal was possible. Visibility of the surgical field remained largely unobstructed even with an endotracheal tube in place. Overall handling of the sMAC prototype was satisfactorily feasible at all times. CONCLUSION: The sMAC system could offer an alternative for patients, where microlaryngoscopy is not applicable. A clinical trial has to clarify if the system benefits in clinical routine. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-04-22 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8266771/ /pubmed/33885971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06791-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Laryngology
Schild, L. R.
Boehm, F.
Kienle, L.
Seitz, A.
Kahrs, L. A.
Boeckers, T. M.
Greve, J.
Hoffmann, T. K.
Schuler, P. J.
Evaluation of a curved surgical prototype in a human larynx
title Evaluation of a curved surgical prototype in a human larynx
title_full Evaluation of a curved surgical prototype in a human larynx
title_fullStr Evaluation of a curved surgical prototype in a human larynx
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a curved surgical prototype in a human larynx
title_short Evaluation of a curved surgical prototype in a human larynx
title_sort evaluation of a curved surgical prototype in a human larynx
topic Laryngology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8266771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33885971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06791-9
work_keys_str_mv AT schildlr evaluationofacurvedsurgicalprototypeinahumanlarynx
AT boehmf evaluationofacurvedsurgicalprototypeinahumanlarynx
AT kienlel evaluationofacurvedsurgicalprototypeinahumanlarynx
AT seitza evaluationofacurvedsurgicalprototypeinahumanlarynx
AT kahrsla evaluationofacurvedsurgicalprototypeinahumanlarynx
AT boeckerstm evaluationofacurvedsurgicalprototypeinahumanlarynx
AT grevej evaluationofacurvedsurgicalprototypeinahumanlarynx
AT hoffmanntk evaluationofacurvedsurgicalprototypeinahumanlarynx
AT schulerpj evaluationofacurvedsurgicalprototypeinahumanlarynx