Cargando…

Vision before and after scharioth macular lens implantation in patients with AMD: an electrophysiological study

BACKGROUND: For patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD), a special intraocular lens implantation partially compensates for the loss in the central part of the visual field. For six months, we evaluated changes in neurophysiological parameters in patients implanted with a “Scharioth macu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kremláček, Jan, Nekolová, Jana, Středová, Markéta, Langrová, Jana, Szanyi, Jana, Kuba, Miroslav, Kubová, Zuzana, Vít, František, Voda, Petr, Veselá, Martina, Jirásková, Naďa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8266777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33392893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10633-020-09814-8
_version_ 1783720001787658240
author Kremláček, Jan
Nekolová, Jana
Středová, Markéta
Langrová, Jana
Szanyi, Jana
Kuba, Miroslav
Kubová, Zuzana
Vít, František
Voda, Petr
Veselá, Martina
Jirásková, Naďa
author_facet Kremláček, Jan
Nekolová, Jana
Středová, Markéta
Langrová, Jana
Szanyi, Jana
Kuba, Miroslav
Kubová, Zuzana
Vít, František
Voda, Petr
Veselá, Martina
Jirásková, Naďa
author_sort Kremláček, Jan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD), a special intraocular lens implantation partially compensates for the loss in the central part of the visual field. For six months, we evaluated changes in neurophysiological parameters in patients implanted with a “Scharioth macula lens” (SML; a center near high add + 10 D and peripheral plano carrier bifocal lens designed to be located between the iris and an artificial lens). METHODS: Fourteen patients (5 M, 9 F, 63–87 years) with dry AMD were examined prior to and at 3 days after, as well as 1, 2, and 6 months after, implantation using pattern-reversal, motion-onset, and cognitive evoked potentials, psychophysical tests evaluating distant and near visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity. RESULTS: Near visual acuity without an external aid was significantly better six months after implantation than before implantation (Jaeger table median (lower; upper quartile): 4 (1; 6) vs. 15 (13; 17)). Distant visual acuity was significantly altered between the pre- (0.7 (0.5; 0.8) logMAR) and last postimplantation visits (0.8 (0.7; 0.8) logMAR), which matched prolongation of the P100 peak time (147 (135; 151) ms vs. 161 (141; 166) ms) of 15 arc min pattern-reversal VEPs and N2 peak time (191.5 (186.5; 214.5) ms vs. 205 (187; 218) ms) of peripheral motion-onset VEPs. CONCLUSION: SML implantation significantly improved near vision. We also observed a slight but significant decrease in distant and peripheral vision. The most efficient electrophysiological approach to test patients with SML was the peripheral motion-onset stimulation, which evoked repeatable and readable VEPs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version containssupplementary material available at (10.1007/s10633-020-09814-8).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8266777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82667772021-07-20 Vision before and after scharioth macular lens implantation in patients with AMD: an electrophysiological study Kremláček, Jan Nekolová, Jana Středová, Markéta Langrová, Jana Szanyi, Jana Kuba, Miroslav Kubová, Zuzana Vít, František Voda, Petr Veselá, Martina Jirásková, Naďa Doc Ophthalmol Original Research Article BACKGROUND: For patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD), a special intraocular lens implantation partially compensates for the loss in the central part of the visual field. For six months, we evaluated changes in neurophysiological parameters in patients implanted with a “Scharioth macula lens” (SML; a center near high add + 10 D and peripheral plano carrier bifocal lens designed to be located between the iris and an artificial lens). METHODS: Fourteen patients (5 M, 9 F, 63–87 years) with dry AMD were examined prior to and at 3 days after, as well as 1, 2, and 6 months after, implantation using pattern-reversal, motion-onset, and cognitive evoked potentials, psychophysical tests evaluating distant and near visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity. RESULTS: Near visual acuity without an external aid was significantly better six months after implantation than before implantation (Jaeger table median (lower; upper quartile): 4 (1; 6) vs. 15 (13; 17)). Distant visual acuity was significantly altered between the pre- (0.7 (0.5; 0.8) logMAR) and last postimplantation visits (0.8 (0.7; 0.8) logMAR), which matched prolongation of the P100 peak time (147 (135; 151) ms vs. 161 (141; 166) ms) of 15 arc min pattern-reversal VEPs and N2 peak time (191.5 (186.5; 214.5) ms vs. 205 (187; 218) ms) of peripheral motion-onset VEPs. CONCLUSION: SML implantation significantly improved near vision. We also observed a slight but significant decrease in distant and peripheral vision. The most efficient electrophysiological approach to test patients with SML was the peripheral motion-onset stimulation, which evoked repeatable and readable VEPs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version containssupplementary material available at (10.1007/s10633-020-09814-8). Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-01-03 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8266777/ /pubmed/33392893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10633-020-09814-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Kremláček, Jan
Nekolová, Jana
Středová, Markéta
Langrová, Jana
Szanyi, Jana
Kuba, Miroslav
Kubová, Zuzana
Vít, František
Voda, Petr
Veselá, Martina
Jirásková, Naďa
Vision before and after scharioth macular lens implantation in patients with AMD: an electrophysiological study
title Vision before and after scharioth macular lens implantation in patients with AMD: an electrophysiological study
title_full Vision before and after scharioth macular lens implantation in patients with AMD: an electrophysiological study
title_fullStr Vision before and after scharioth macular lens implantation in patients with AMD: an electrophysiological study
title_full_unstemmed Vision before and after scharioth macular lens implantation in patients with AMD: an electrophysiological study
title_short Vision before and after scharioth macular lens implantation in patients with AMD: an electrophysiological study
title_sort vision before and after scharioth macular lens implantation in patients with amd: an electrophysiological study
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8266777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33392893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10633-020-09814-8
work_keys_str_mv AT kremlacekjan visionbeforeandafterschariothmacularlensimplantationinpatientswithamdanelectrophysiologicalstudy
AT nekolovajana visionbeforeandafterschariothmacularlensimplantationinpatientswithamdanelectrophysiologicalstudy
AT stredovamarketa visionbeforeandafterschariothmacularlensimplantationinpatientswithamdanelectrophysiologicalstudy
AT langrovajana visionbeforeandafterschariothmacularlensimplantationinpatientswithamdanelectrophysiologicalstudy
AT szanyijana visionbeforeandafterschariothmacularlensimplantationinpatientswithamdanelectrophysiologicalstudy
AT kubamiroslav visionbeforeandafterschariothmacularlensimplantationinpatientswithamdanelectrophysiologicalstudy
AT kubovazuzana visionbeforeandafterschariothmacularlensimplantationinpatientswithamdanelectrophysiologicalstudy
AT vitfrantisek visionbeforeandafterschariothmacularlensimplantationinpatientswithamdanelectrophysiologicalstudy
AT vodapetr visionbeforeandafterschariothmacularlensimplantationinpatientswithamdanelectrophysiologicalstudy
AT veselamartina visionbeforeandafterschariothmacularlensimplantationinpatientswithamdanelectrophysiologicalstudy
AT jiraskovanada visionbeforeandafterschariothmacularlensimplantationinpatientswithamdanelectrophysiologicalstudy