Cargando…
Evaluation of a novel particle-based multi-analyte technology for the detection of anti-fibrillarin antibodies
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease associated with several anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), including those in the classification criteria (anti-centromere, anti-topoisomerase I (Scl-70), anti-RNA Pol III). However, the presence of less common antibodies such as anti-fibril...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8266783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33913080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12026-021-09197-1 |
_version_ | 1783720003214770176 |
---|---|
author | Mahler, Michael Kim, Grace Roup, Fabrece Bentow, Chelsea Fabien, Nicole Goncalves, David Palterer, Boaz Fritzler, Marvin J. Villalta, Danilo |
author_facet | Mahler, Michael Kim, Grace Roup, Fabrece Bentow, Chelsea Fabien, Nicole Goncalves, David Palterer, Boaz Fritzler, Marvin J. Villalta, Danilo |
author_sort | Mahler, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease associated with several anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), including those in the classification criteria (anti-centromere, anti-topoisomerase I (Scl-70), anti-RNA Pol III). However, the presence of less common antibodies such as anti-fibrillarin (U3-RNP) that generate a clumpy nucleolar pattern by HEp-2 indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA, ICAP AC-9) are considered disease specific and are with clinical subsets of SSc, therefore playing a role in diagnosis and prognosis. A specific and sensitive anti-fibrillarin assay would be an important addition to serological diagnosis and evaluation of SSc. The goal of this study was to evaluate a new particle-based multi-analyte technology (PMAT) for the measurement of anti-fibrillarin antibodies. A total of 149 patient samples were collected including 47 samples from France (Lyon and Paris, n = 32) and Italy (Careggi Hospital, Florence, n = 15) selected based on AC-9 HEp-2 IFA staining (> 1:640, clumpy nucleolar pattern) and 102 non-SSc controls (inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) n = 20, Sjögren’s syndrome (SjS) n = 20, infectious disease (ID) n = 7, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) n = 17, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) n = 17, and healthy individuals (HI) n = 21). All samples were tested on the anti-fibrillarin PMAT assay (research use only, Inova Diagnostics, USA). Additionally, the 47 anti-fibrillarin positive samples were also tested on PMAT assays for detecting other autoantibodies in ANA-associated rheumatic diseases (AARD). Anti-fibrillarin antibody data performed by fluorescence enzyme immunoassay (FEIA, Thermo Fisher, Germany) was available for 34 samples. The anti-fibrillarin PMAT assay was positive in 31/32 (96.9%, France) and 12/15 (80.0%, Italy) of samples preselected based on the AC-9 IIF pattern (difference p = 0.09). Collectively, the PMAT assay showed 91.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 80.1–96.6%) sensitivity with 100.0% (95% CI: 96.4–100.0%) specificity in non-SSc controls. Strong agreement was found between PMAT and FEIA with 100.0% positive qualitative agreement (34/34) and quantitative agreement (Spearman’s rho = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.77.9–0.95%, p < 0.0001). Although most anti-fibrillarin positive samples were mono-specific (69.8%), some expressed additional antibodies (namely Scl-70, centromere, dsDNA, Ro52, Ro60, SS-B, Ribo-P, DFS70, and EJ). In conclusion, this first study on anti-fibrillarin antibodies measured using a novel PMAT assay shows promising results where the new PMAT assay had high level of agreement to FEIA for the detection of anti-fibrillarin antibodies. The availability of novel AFA assays such as PMAT might facilitate the clinical deployment, additional studies, standardization efforts, and potentially consideration of AFA for next generations of the classification criteria. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12026-021-09197-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8266783 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82667832021-07-20 Evaluation of a novel particle-based multi-analyte technology for the detection of anti-fibrillarin antibodies Mahler, Michael Kim, Grace Roup, Fabrece Bentow, Chelsea Fabien, Nicole Goncalves, David Palterer, Boaz Fritzler, Marvin J. Villalta, Danilo Immunol Res Original Article Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease associated with several anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), including those in the classification criteria (anti-centromere, anti-topoisomerase I (Scl-70), anti-RNA Pol III). However, the presence of less common antibodies such as anti-fibrillarin (U3-RNP) that generate a clumpy nucleolar pattern by HEp-2 indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA, ICAP AC-9) are considered disease specific and are with clinical subsets of SSc, therefore playing a role in diagnosis and prognosis. A specific and sensitive anti-fibrillarin assay would be an important addition to serological diagnosis and evaluation of SSc. The goal of this study was to evaluate a new particle-based multi-analyte technology (PMAT) for the measurement of anti-fibrillarin antibodies. A total of 149 patient samples were collected including 47 samples from France (Lyon and Paris, n = 32) and Italy (Careggi Hospital, Florence, n = 15) selected based on AC-9 HEp-2 IFA staining (> 1:640, clumpy nucleolar pattern) and 102 non-SSc controls (inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) n = 20, Sjögren’s syndrome (SjS) n = 20, infectious disease (ID) n = 7, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) n = 17, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) n = 17, and healthy individuals (HI) n = 21). All samples were tested on the anti-fibrillarin PMAT assay (research use only, Inova Diagnostics, USA). Additionally, the 47 anti-fibrillarin positive samples were also tested on PMAT assays for detecting other autoantibodies in ANA-associated rheumatic diseases (AARD). Anti-fibrillarin antibody data performed by fluorescence enzyme immunoassay (FEIA, Thermo Fisher, Germany) was available for 34 samples. The anti-fibrillarin PMAT assay was positive in 31/32 (96.9%, France) and 12/15 (80.0%, Italy) of samples preselected based on the AC-9 IIF pattern (difference p = 0.09). Collectively, the PMAT assay showed 91.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 80.1–96.6%) sensitivity with 100.0% (95% CI: 96.4–100.0%) specificity in non-SSc controls. Strong agreement was found between PMAT and FEIA with 100.0% positive qualitative agreement (34/34) and quantitative agreement (Spearman’s rho = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.77.9–0.95%, p < 0.0001). Although most anti-fibrillarin positive samples were mono-specific (69.8%), some expressed additional antibodies (namely Scl-70, centromere, dsDNA, Ro52, Ro60, SS-B, Ribo-P, DFS70, and EJ). In conclusion, this first study on anti-fibrillarin antibodies measured using a novel PMAT assay shows promising results where the new PMAT assay had high level of agreement to FEIA for the detection of anti-fibrillarin antibodies. The availability of novel AFA assays such as PMAT might facilitate the clinical deployment, additional studies, standardization efforts, and potentially consideration of AFA for next generations of the classification criteria. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12026-021-09197-1. Springer US 2021-04-28 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8266783/ /pubmed/33913080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12026-021-09197-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mahler, Michael Kim, Grace Roup, Fabrece Bentow, Chelsea Fabien, Nicole Goncalves, David Palterer, Boaz Fritzler, Marvin J. Villalta, Danilo Evaluation of a novel particle-based multi-analyte technology for the detection of anti-fibrillarin antibodies |
title | Evaluation of a novel particle-based multi-analyte technology for the detection of anti-fibrillarin antibodies |
title_full | Evaluation of a novel particle-based multi-analyte technology for the detection of anti-fibrillarin antibodies |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a novel particle-based multi-analyte technology for the detection of anti-fibrillarin antibodies |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a novel particle-based multi-analyte technology for the detection of anti-fibrillarin antibodies |
title_short | Evaluation of a novel particle-based multi-analyte technology for the detection of anti-fibrillarin antibodies |
title_sort | evaluation of a novel particle-based multi-analyte technology for the detection of anti-fibrillarin antibodies |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8266783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33913080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12026-021-09197-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahlermichael evaluationofanovelparticlebasedmultianalytetechnologyforthedetectionofantifibrillarinantibodies AT kimgrace evaluationofanovelparticlebasedmultianalytetechnologyforthedetectionofantifibrillarinantibodies AT roupfabrece evaluationofanovelparticlebasedmultianalytetechnologyforthedetectionofantifibrillarinantibodies AT bentowchelsea evaluationofanovelparticlebasedmultianalytetechnologyforthedetectionofantifibrillarinantibodies AT fabiennicole evaluationofanovelparticlebasedmultianalytetechnologyforthedetectionofantifibrillarinantibodies AT goncalvesdavid evaluationofanovelparticlebasedmultianalytetechnologyforthedetectionofantifibrillarinantibodies AT paltererboaz evaluationofanovelparticlebasedmultianalytetechnologyforthedetectionofantifibrillarinantibodies AT fritzlermarvinj evaluationofanovelparticlebasedmultianalytetechnologyforthedetectionofantifibrillarinantibodies AT villaltadanilo evaluationofanovelparticlebasedmultianalytetechnologyforthedetectionofantifibrillarinantibodies |