Cargando…
Characteristics of patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw with oral versus intravenous bisphosphonate treatment
PURPOSE: This retrospective study was aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes in patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw who were receiving oral versus intravenous (IV) bisphosphonate (BP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled subjects who had been di...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Singapore
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8266939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34236538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-021-00310-w |
_version_ | 1783720038770933760 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Seung-Hun Choi, So-Young Bae, Min-Su Kwon, Tae-Geon |
author_facet | Lee, Seung-Hun Choi, So-Young Bae, Min-Su Kwon, Tae-Geon |
author_sort | Lee, Seung-Hun |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This retrospective study was aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes in patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw who were receiving oral versus intravenous (IV) bisphosphonate (BP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled subjects who had been diagnosed with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) during the period from July 2010 to June 2014. Information regarding the following demographic and clinical characteristics was collected: demographic data, administration route and type of BP, duration of BP medication, primary disease, number of involved sites, location of the lesion, number of surgeries, outcome of treatments, and laboratory test. All the patients were divided into oral and IV BP groups; and the between-group differences were compared. RESULTS: Total 278 patients were divided into two groups as per the route of BP administration. The proportion of oral BP-related MRONJ group were more dominant over IV BP group (oral BP, n = 251; IV BP, n = 27). In the IV BP group, the average dosing duration (31.4 months) was significantly shorter than that in the oral BP group (53.1 months) (P < 0.001). The average number of involved sites in the oral BP group (1.21 ± 0.48) was smaller than that in the IV BP group (1.63 ± 0.84) (P < 0.001). The average number of surgeries was higher in the IV BP group (1.65 ± 0.95) as compared to that in the oral BP group (0.98 ± 0.73) (P < 0.001). Outcome after the surgery for MRONJ after IV BP was poor than oral BP group. CONCLUSION: IV administration of BP causes greater inhibition of bone remodeling and could lead more severe inflammation. Therefore, even if the duration of IV administration of BP is shorter than that of oral BP, the extent of the lesion could be more extensive. Therefore, the result suggests that the MRONJ after IV BP for cancer patients needs to be considered as different characteristics to oral BP group for osteoporosis patents. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8266939 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82669392021-07-20 Characteristics of patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw with oral versus intravenous bisphosphonate treatment Lee, Seung-Hun Choi, So-Young Bae, Min-Su Kwon, Tae-Geon Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg Research PURPOSE: This retrospective study was aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes in patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw who were receiving oral versus intravenous (IV) bisphosphonate (BP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled subjects who had been diagnosed with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) during the period from July 2010 to June 2014. Information regarding the following demographic and clinical characteristics was collected: demographic data, administration route and type of BP, duration of BP medication, primary disease, number of involved sites, location of the lesion, number of surgeries, outcome of treatments, and laboratory test. All the patients were divided into oral and IV BP groups; and the between-group differences were compared. RESULTS: Total 278 patients were divided into two groups as per the route of BP administration. The proportion of oral BP-related MRONJ group were more dominant over IV BP group (oral BP, n = 251; IV BP, n = 27). In the IV BP group, the average dosing duration (31.4 months) was significantly shorter than that in the oral BP group (53.1 months) (P < 0.001). The average number of involved sites in the oral BP group (1.21 ± 0.48) was smaller than that in the IV BP group (1.63 ± 0.84) (P < 0.001). The average number of surgeries was higher in the IV BP group (1.65 ± 0.95) as compared to that in the oral BP group (0.98 ± 0.73) (P < 0.001). Outcome after the surgery for MRONJ after IV BP was poor than oral BP group. CONCLUSION: IV administration of BP causes greater inhibition of bone remodeling and could lead more severe inflammation. Therefore, even if the duration of IV administration of BP is shorter than that of oral BP, the extent of the lesion could be more extensive. Therefore, the result suggests that the MRONJ after IV BP for cancer patients needs to be considered as different characteristics to oral BP group for osteoporosis patents. Springer Singapore 2021-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8266939/ /pubmed/34236538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-021-00310-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Lee, Seung-Hun Choi, So-Young Bae, Min-Su Kwon, Tae-Geon Characteristics of patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw with oral versus intravenous bisphosphonate treatment |
title | Characteristics of patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw with oral versus intravenous bisphosphonate treatment |
title_full | Characteristics of patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw with oral versus intravenous bisphosphonate treatment |
title_fullStr | Characteristics of patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw with oral versus intravenous bisphosphonate treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Characteristics of patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw with oral versus intravenous bisphosphonate treatment |
title_short | Characteristics of patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw with oral versus intravenous bisphosphonate treatment |
title_sort | characteristics of patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw with oral versus intravenous bisphosphonate treatment |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8266939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34236538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-021-00310-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leeseunghun characteristicsofpatientswithosteonecrosisofthejawwithoralversusintravenousbisphosphonatetreatment AT choisoyoung characteristicsofpatientswithosteonecrosisofthejawwithoralversusintravenousbisphosphonatetreatment AT baeminsu characteristicsofpatientswithosteonecrosisofthejawwithoralversusintravenousbisphosphonatetreatment AT kwontaegeon characteristicsofpatientswithosteonecrosisofthejawwithoralversusintravenousbisphosphonatetreatment |