Cargando…

Characteristics of patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw with oral versus intravenous bisphosphonate treatment

PURPOSE: This retrospective study was aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes in patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw who were receiving oral versus intravenous (IV) bisphosphonate (BP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled subjects who had been di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Seung-Hun, Choi, So-Young, Bae, Min-Su, Kwon, Tae-Geon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8266939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34236538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-021-00310-w
_version_ 1783720038770933760
author Lee, Seung-Hun
Choi, So-Young
Bae, Min-Su
Kwon, Tae-Geon
author_facet Lee, Seung-Hun
Choi, So-Young
Bae, Min-Su
Kwon, Tae-Geon
author_sort Lee, Seung-Hun
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This retrospective study was aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes in patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw who were receiving oral versus intravenous (IV) bisphosphonate (BP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled subjects who had been diagnosed with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) during the period from July 2010 to June 2014. Information regarding the following demographic and clinical characteristics was collected: demographic data, administration route and type of BP, duration of BP medication, primary disease, number of involved sites, location of the lesion, number of surgeries, outcome of treatments, and laboratory test. All the patients were divided into oral and IV BP groups; and the between-group differences were compared. RESULTS: Total 278 patients were divided into two groups as per the route of BP administration. The proportion of oral BP-related MRONJ group were more dominant over IV BP group (oral BP, n = 251; IV BP, n = 27). In the IV BP group, the average dosing duration (31.4 months) was significantly shorter than that in the oral BP group (53.1 months) (P < 0.001). The average number of involved sites in the oral BP group (1.21 ± 0.48) was smaller than that in the IV BP group (1.63 ± 0.84) (P < 0.001). The average number of surgeries was higher in the IV BP group (1.65 ± 0.95) as compared to that in the oral BP group (0.98 ± 0.73) (P < 0.001). Outcome after the surgery for MRONJ after IV BP was poor than oral BP group. CONCLUSION: IV administration of BP causes greater inhibition of bone remodeling and could lead more severe inflammation. Therefore, even if the duration of IV administration of BP is shorter than that of oral BP, the extent of the lesion could be more extensive. Therefore, the result suggests that the MRONJ after IV BP for cancer patients needs to be considered as different characteristics to oral BP group for osteoporosis patents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8266939
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82669392021-07-20 Characteristics of patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw with oral versus intravenous bisphosphonate treatment Lee, Seung-Hun Choi, So-Young Bae, Min-Su Kwon, Tae-Geon Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg Research PURPOSE: This retrospective study was aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes in patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw who were receiving oral versus intravenous (IV) bisphosphonate (BP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled subjects who had been diagnosed with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) during the period from July 2010 to June 2014. Information regarding the following demographic and clinical characteristics was collected: demographic data, administration route and type of BP, duration of BP medication, primary disease, number of involved sites, location of the lesion, number of surgeries, outcome of treatments, and laboratory test. All the patients were divided into oral and IV BP groups; and the between-group differences were compared. RESULTS: Total 278 patients were divided into two groups as per the route of BP administration. The proportion of oral BP-related MRONJ group were more dominant over IV BP group (oral BP, n = 251; IV BP, n = 27). In the IV BP group, the average dosing duration (31.4 months) was significantly shorter than that in the oral BP group (53.1 months) (P < 0.001). The average number of involved sites in the oral BP group (1.21 ± 0.48) was smaller than that in the IV BP group (1.63 ± 0.84) (P < 0.001). The average number of surgeries was higher in the IV BP group (1.65 ± 0.95) as compared to that in the oral BP group (0.98 ± 0.73) (P < 0.001). Outcome after the surgery for MRONJ after IV BP was poor than oral BP group. CONCLUSION: IV administration of BP causes greater inhibition of bone remodeling and could lead more severe inflammation. Therefore, even if the duration of IV administration of BP is shorter than that of oral BP, the extent of the lesion could be more extensive. Therefore, the result suggests that the MRONJ after IV BP for cancer patients needs to be considered as different characteristics to oral BP group for osteoporosis patents. Springer Singapore 2021-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8266939/ /pubmed/34236538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-021-00310-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Lee, Seung-Hun
Choi, So-Young
Bae, Min-Su
Kwon, Tae-Geon
Characteristics of patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw with oral versus intravenous bisphosphonate treatment
title Characteristics of patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw with oral versus intravenous bisphosphonate treatment
title_full Characteristics of patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw with oral versus intravenous bisphosphonate treatment
title_fullStr Characteristics of patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw with oral versus intravenous bisphosphonate treatment
title_full_unstemmed Characteristics of patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw with oral versus intravenous bisphosphonate treatment
title_short Characteristics of patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw with oral versus intravenous bisphosphonate treatment
title_sort characteristics of patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw with oral versus intravenous bisphosphonate treatment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8266939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34236538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-021-00310-w
work_keys_str_mv AT leeseunghun characteristicsofpatientswithosteonecrosisofthejawwithoralversusintravenousbisphosphonatetreatment
AT choisoyoung characteristicsofpatientswithosteonecrosisofthejawwithoralversusintravenousbisphosphonatetreatment
AT baeminsu characteristicsofpatientswithosteonecrosisofthejawwithoralversusintravenousbisphosphonatetreatment
AT kwontaegeon characteristicsofpatientswithosteonecrosisofthejawwithoralversusintravenousbisphosphonatetreatment