Cargando…
The Effects of Biofeedback on Performance and Technique of the Boxing Jab
A growing body of research has addressed the application of movement-based biofeedback techniques for improving sports performers’ gross motor skills. Unlike in previous research, we aimed in this study to quantify the effects of this “external” biofeedback on selected performance and technique vari...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8267084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33940988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00315125211013251 |
_version_ | 1783720065192951808 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Mark A. Spanton, K. van Schaik, P. Spears, I. Eaves, D. |
author_facet | Chen, Mark A. Spanton, K. van Schaik, P. Spears, I. Eaves, D. |
author_sort | Chen, Mark A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A growing body of research has addressed the application of movement-based biofeedback techniques for improving sports performers’ gross motor skills. Unlike in previous research, we aimed in this study to quantify the effects of this “external” biofeedback on selected performance and technique variables for the boxing jab among both novices and experts. The technical setup included two inertial measurement units linked wirelessly to a video game system with audio output. The units were configured to provide auditory external biofeedback, based on the peak acceleration of the bag (i.e., biofeedback with an external attentional focus). Sixteen participants (8 novices and 8 experts) performed boxing jabs against the bag in blocked phases of biofeedback. When compared to baseline, the acute effects of externally focused biofeedback on peak bag acceleration were possibly positive in both retention phases for novices (d = 0.29; d = 0.41) and likely positive for experts (d = 0.41; d = 0.30), respectively. The experts’ performance improvements were accompanied by substantive increases in trunk rotation, though this was not true for the novices. Thus, technique improvements can be promoted indirectly via externally focused biofeedback, but only when these actions are within the performers’ motor repertoire. Overall, biofeedback via inertial sensors appears to be a potent technique for modifying human movement patterns in both experts and novices. This low-cost technology could be used to support training across sports, rehabilitation and human-computer interactions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8267084 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82670842021-07-20 The Effects of Biofeedback on Performance and Technique of the Boxing Jab Chen, Mark A. Spanton, K. van Schaik, P. Spears, I. Eaves, D. Percept Mot Skills Section III. Peak Performance A growing body of research has addressed the application of movement-based biofeedback techniques for improving sports performers’ gross motor skills. Unlike in previous research, we aimed in this study to quantify the effects of this “external” biofeedback on selected performance and technique variables for the boxing jab among both novices and experts. The technical setup included two inertial measurement units linked wirelessly to a video game system with audio output. The units were configured to provide auditory external biofeedback, based on the peak acceleration of the bag (i.e., biofeedback with an external attentional focus). Sixteen participants (8 novices and 8 experts) performed boxing jabs against the bag in blocked phases of biofeedback. When compared to baseline, the acute effects of externally focused biofeedback on peak bag acceleration were possibly positive in both retention phases for novices (d = 0.29; d = 0.41) and likely positive for experts (d = 0.41; d = 0.30), respectively. The experts’ performance improvements were accompanied by substantive increases in trunk rotation, though this was not true for the novices. Thus, technique improvements can be promoted indirectly via externally focused biofeedback, but only when these actions are within the performers’ motor repertoire. Overall, biofeedback via inertial sensors appears to be a potent technique for modifying human movement patterns in both experts and novices. This low-cost technology could be used to support training across sports, rehabilitation and human-computer interactions. SAGE Publications 2021-05-03 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8267084/ /pubmed/33940988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00315125211013251 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Section III. Peak Performance Chen, Mark A. Spanton, K. van Schaik, P. Spears, I. Eaves, D. The Effects of Biofeedback on Performance and Technique of the Boxing Jab |
title | The Effects of Biofeedback on Performance and Technique of the Boxing Jab |
title_full | The Effects of Biofeedback on Performance and Technique of the Boxing Jab |
title_fullStr | The Effects of Biofeedback on Performance and Technique of the Boxing Jab |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effects of Biofeedback on Performance and Technique of the Boxing Jab |
title_short | The Effects of Biofeedback on Performance and Technique of the Boxing Jab |
title_sort | effects of biofeedback on performance and technique of the boxing jab |
topic | Section III. Peak Performance |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8267084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33940988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00315125211013251 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenmarka theeffectsofbiofeedbackonperformanceandtechniqueoftheboxingjab AT spantonk theeffectsofbiofeedbackonperformanceandtechniqueoftheboxingjab AT vanschaikp theeffectsofbiofeedbackonperformanceandtechniqueoftheboxingjab AT spearsi theeffectsofbiofeedbackonperformanceandtechniqueoftheboxingjab AT eavesd theeffectsofbiofeedbackonperformanceandtechniqueoftheboxingjab AT chenmarka effectsofbiofeedbackonperformanceandtechniqueoftheboxingjab AT spantonk effectsofbiofeedbackonperformanceandtechniqueoftheboxingjab AT vanschaikp effectsofbiofeedbackonperformanceandtechniqueoftheboxingjab AT spearsi effectsofbiofeedbackonperformanceandtechniqueoftheboxingjab AT eavesd effectsofbiofeedbackonperformanceandtechniqueoftheboxingjab |