Cargando…

Where Are the Women in Radiation Oncology? A Cross-Sectional Multi-Specialty Comparative Analysis

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the growth of women within the general radiation oncology (RO) workforce in comparison to the growth among other medical specialties. We also sought to create a predictive model for gender diversity to guide future recruitment efforts. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We identifi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Odei, Bismarck, Kahn, Jenna, Holliday, Emma Brey, Diaz, Dayssy Alexandra, Bello-Pardo, Erika, Odei, James, Bae, Junu, Arnett, Andrea, Raval, Raju, Mitchell, Darrion
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8267431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34278054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2021.100735
_version_ 1783720144332128256
author Odei, Bismarck
Kahn, Jenna
Holliday, Emma Brey
Diaz, Dayssy Alexandra
Bello-Pardo, Erika
Odei, James
Bae, Junu
Arnett, Andrea
Raval, Raju
Mitchell, Darrion
author_facet Odei, Bismarck
Kahn, Jenna
Holliday, Emma Brey
Diaz, Dayssy Alexandra
Bello-Pardo, Erika
Odei, James
Bae, Junu
Arnett, Andrea
Raval, Raju
Mitchell, Darrion
author_sort Odei, Bismarck
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the growth of women within the general radiation oncology (RO) workforce in comparison to the growth among other medical specialties. We also sought to create a predictive model for gender diversity to guide future recruitment efforts. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We identified 16 medical specialties, including RO, for analyses. We used data from the Association of American Colleges and assessed female representation at 4 time points (2006, 2011, 2016, and 2020). Additionally, we determined characteristics of medical specialties that were predictive of increased gender diversity. We performed univariate statistical analysis with linear regression to evaluate factors predictive of greater gender diversity among the medical specialties in our cohort. RESULTS: The proportion of women within the represented specialties increased over time. Obstetrics/gynecology (14,750 [2006], 23,921 [2020]; 18.7% absolute growth) and dermatology (3568 [2006], 6329 [2020]; 15.1% absolute growth) experienced the highest absolute growth in female representation between 2006 and 2020. When assessing changes between various time points in RO, the absolute change in female physicians increased by 1.5% between 2006 and 2011, by 2.2% between 2011 and 2016, and by only 0.4% between 2016 and 2020, which was the lowest growth pattern relative to the other 15 specialties. Factors predictive of gender diversity among specialties were lower average step 1 scores (P = .0056), fewer years of training (P = .0078), fewer work hours (P = .046), the availability of a standard third year clerkship for a given specialty (P = .0061), and a high baseline number of female physicians within a specialty (P = .0078). Research activities (P = .099) and interest among matriculating medical students (P = .28) were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of women in RO lags behind other medical specialties and has been notably low in the last few years. Interventions that incorporate novel initiatives proposed within this study may accelerate current recruitment milestones.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8267431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82674312021-07-16 Where Are the Women in Radiation Oncology? A Cross-Sectional Multi-Specialty Comparative Analysis Odei, Bismarck Kahn, Jenna Holliday, Emma Brey Diaz, Dayssy Alexandra Bello-Pardo, Erika Odei, James Bae, Junu Arnett, Andrea Raval, Raju Mitchell, Darrion Adv Radiat Oncol Research Letter PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the growth of women within the general radiation oncology (RO) workforce in comparison to the growth among other medical specialties. We also sought to create a predictive model for gender diversity to guide future recruitment efforts. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We identified 16 medical specialties, including RO, for analyses. We used data from the Association of American Colleges and assessed female representation at 4 time points (2006, 2011, 2016, and 2020). Additionally, we determined characteristics of medical specialties that were predictive of increased gender diversity. We performed univariate statistical analysis with linear regression to evaluate factors predictive of greater gender diversity among the medical specialties in our cohort. RESULTS: The proportion of women within the represented specialties increased over time. Obstetrics/gynecology (14,750 [2006], 23,921 [2020]; 18.7% absolute growth) and dermatology (3568 [2006], 6329 [2020]; 15.1% absolute growth) experienced the highest absolute growth in female representation between 2006 and 2020. When assessing changes between various time points in RO, the absolute change in female physicians increased by 1.5% between 2006 and 2011, by 2.2% between 2011 and 2016, and by only 0.4% between 2016 and 2020, which was the lowest growth pattern relative to the other 15 specialties. Factors predictive of gender diversity among specialties were lower average step 1 scores (P = .0056), fewer years of training (P = .0078), fewer work hours (P = .046), the availability of a standard third year clerkship for a given specialty (P = .0061), and a high baseline number of female physicians within a specialty (P = .0078). Research activities (P = .099) and interest among matriculating medical students (P = .28) were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of women in RO lags behind other medical specialties and has been notably low in the last few years. Interventions that incorporate novel initiatives proposed within this study may accelerate current recruitment milestones. Elsevier 2021-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8267431/ /pubmed/34278054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2021.100735 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Letter
Odei, Bismarck
Kahn, Jenna
Holliday, Emma Brey
Diaz, Dayssy Alexandra
Bello-Pardo, Erika
Odei, James
Bae, Junu
Arnett, Andrea
Raval, Raju
Mitchell, Darrion
Where Are the Women in Radiation Oncology? A Cross-Sectional Multi-Specialty Comparative Analysis
title Where Are the Women in Radiation Oncology? A Cross-Sectional Multi-Specialty Comparative Analysis
title_full Where Are the Women in Radiation Oncology? A Cross-Sectional Multi-Specialty Comparative Analysis
title_fullStr Where Are the Women in Radiation Oncology? A Cross-Sectional Multi-Specialty Comparative Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Where Are the Women in Radiation Oncology? A Cross-Sectional Multi-Specialty Comparative Analysis
title_short Where Are the Women in Radiation Oncology? A Cross-Sectional Multi-Specialty Comparative Analysis
title_sort where are the women in radiation oncology? a cross-sectional multi-specialty comparative analysis
topic Research Letter
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8267431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34278054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2021.100735
work_keys_str_mv AT odeibismarck wherearethewomeninradiationoncologyacrosssectionalmultispecialtycomparativeanalysis
AT kahnjenna wherearethewomeninradiationoncologyacrosssectionalmultispecialtycomparativeanalysis
AT hollidayemmabrey wherearethewomeninradiationoncologyacrosssectionalmultispecialtycomparativeanalysis
AT diazdayssyalexandra wherearethewomeninradiationoncologyacrosssectionalmultispecialtycomparativeanalysis
AT bellopardoerika wherearethewomeninradiationoncologyacrosssectionalmultispecialtycomparativeanalysis
AT odeijames wherearethewomeninradiationoncologyacrosssectionalmultispecialtycomparativeanalysis
AT baejunu wherearethewomeninradiationoncologyacrosssectionalmultispecialtycomparativeanalysis
AT arnettandrea wherearethewomeninradiationoncologyacrosssectionalmultispecialtycomparativeanalysis
AT ravalraju wherearethewomeninradiationoncologyacrosssectionalmultispecialtycomparativeanalysis
AT mitchelldarrion wherearethewomeninradiationoncologyacrosssectionalmultispecialtycomparativeanalysis