Cargando…

The Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Usher Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Objective: To systematically appraise the implementation of cochlear implantation (CI) in Usher Syndrome (USH) Types 1, 2, and 3 patients, and analyze who would benefit from CI. Data Sources: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library electronic databases from inception t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davies, Camron, Bergman, Jenna, Misztal, Carly, Ramchandran, Renuka, Mittal, Jeenu, Bulut, Erdogan, Shah, Viraj, Mittal, Rahul, Eshraghi, Adrien A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8267700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34209904
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132915
_version_ 1783720199704281088
author Davies, Camron
Bergman, Jenna
Misztal, Carly
Ramchandran, Renuka
Mittal, Jeenu
Bulut, Erdogan
Shah, Viraj
Mittal, Rahul
Eshraghi, Adrien A.
author_facet Davies, Camron
Bergman, Jenna
Misztal, Carly
Ramchandran, Renuka
Mittal, Jeenu
Bulut, Erdogan
Shah, Viraj
Mittal, Rahul
Eshraghi, Adrien A.
author_sort Davies, Camron
collection PubMed
description Objective: To systematically appraise the implementation of cochlear implantation (CI) in Usher Syndrome (USH) Types 1, 2, and 3 patients, and analyze who would benefit from CI. Data Sources: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library electronic databases from inception through June 2020 was performed. There were no language restrictions. Study Selection: The PRISMA strategy was followed. Included studies discuss USH patients who underwent CI regardless of age, nationality, or clinical subtype. All included studies report post-implantation functional, cognitive, or quality of life outcomes. Only reviews were excluded. Results: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. USH patients experienced improvements in PTA and speech perception and expression outcomes after CI, as well as improvements in phonological memory and quality of life measures. Overall, patients implanted at younger ages outperformed older patients in audiological testing. Similarly, patients with prolonged auditory deprivation had relatively poor performance outcomes in sentence recognition and speech detection following CI. Conclusions: Most USH patients benefit from CI. USH patients who undergo CI at younger ages generally achieve better hearing, speech, and cognitive outcomes. CI at older ages can still prove beneficial if appropriate auditory amplification is started at the right time. Further research is warranted to fill the gap in understanding regarding the gene mutations underlying the pathophysiology of USH that have favorable CI outcomes as well as the optimal time to perform CI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8267700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82677002021-07-10 The Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Usher Syndrome: A Systematic Review Davies, Camron Bergman, Jenna Misztal, Carly Ramchandran, Renuka Mittal, Jeenu Bulut, Erdogan Shah, Viraj Mittal, Rahul Eshraghi, Adrien A. J Clin Med Review Objective: To systematically appraise the implementation of cochlear implantation (CI) in Usher Syndrome (USH) Types 1, 2, and 3 patients, and analyze who would benefit from CI. Data Sources: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library electronic databases from inception through June 2020 was performed. There were no language restrictions. Study Selection: The PRISMA strategy was followed. Included studies discuss USH patients who underwent CI regardless of age, nationality, or clinical subtype. All included studies report post-implantation functional, cognitive, or quality of life outcomes. Only reviews were excluded. Results: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. USH patients experienced improvements in PTA and speech perception and expression outcomes after CI, as well as improvements in phonological memory and quality of life measures. Overall, patients implanted at younger ages outperformed older patients in audiological testing. Similarly, patients with prolonged auditory deprivation had relatively poor performance outcomes in sentence recognition and speech detection following CI. Conclusions: Most USH patients benefit from CI. USH patients who undergo CI at younger ages generally achieve better hearing, speech, and cognitive outcomes. CI at older ages can still prove beneficial if appropriate auditory amplification is started at the right time. Further research is warranted to fill the gap in understanding regarding the gene mutations underlying the pathophysiology of USH that have favorable CI outcomes as well as the optimal time to perform CI. MDPI 2021-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8267700/ /pubmed/34209904 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132915 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Davies, Camron
Bergman, Jenna
Misztal, Carly
Ramchandran, Renuka
Mittal, Jeenu
Bulut, Erdogan
Shah, Viraj
Mittal, Rahul
Eshraghi, Adrien A.
The Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Usher Syndrome: A Systematic Review
title The Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Usher Syndrome: A Systematic Review
title_full The Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Usher Syndrome: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr The Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Usher Syndrome: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed The Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Usher Syndrome: A Systematic Review
title_short The Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Usher Syndrome: A Systematic Review
title_sort outcomes of cochlear implantation in usher syndrome: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8267700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34209904
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132915
work_keys_str_mv AT daviescamron theoutcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview
AT bergmanjenna theoutcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview
AT misztalcarly theoutcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview
AT ramchandranrenuka theoutcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview
AT mittaljeenu theoutcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview
AT buluterdogan theoutcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview
AT shahviraj theoutcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview
AT mittalrahul theoutcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview
AT eshraghiadriena theoutcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview
AT daviescamron outcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview
AT bergmanjenna outcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview
AT misztalcarly outcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview
AT ramchandranrenuka outcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview
AT mittaljeenu outcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview
AT buluterdogan outcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview
AT shahviraj outcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview
AT mittalrahul outcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview
AT eshraghiadriena outcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview