Cargando…
The Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Usher Syndrome: A Systematic Review
Objective: To systematically appraise the implementation of cochlear implantation (CI) in Usher Syndrome (USH) Types 1, 2, and 3 patients, and analyze who would benefit from CI. Data Sources: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library electronic databases from inception t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8267700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34209904 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132915 |
_version_ | 1783720199704281088 |
---|---|
author | Davies, Camron Bergman, Jenna Misztal, Carly Ramchandran, Renuka Mittal, Jeenu Bulut, Erdogan Shah, Viraj Mittal, Rahul Eshraghi, Adrien A. |
author_facet | Davies, Camron Bergman, Jenna Misztal, Carly Ramchandran, Renuka Mittal, Jeenu Bulut, Erdogan Shah, Viraj Mittal, Rahul Eshraghi, Adrien A. |
author_sort | Davies, Camron |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To systematically appraise the implementation of cochlear implantation (CI) in Usher Syndrome (USH) Types 1, 2, and 3 patients, and analyze who would benefit from CI. Data Sources: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library electronic databases from inception through June 2020 was performed. There were no language restrictions. Study Selection: The PRISMA strategy was followed. Included studies discuss USH patients who underwent CI regardless of age, nationality, or clinical subtype. All included studies report post-implantation functional, cognitive, or quality of life outcomes. Only reviews were excluded. Results: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. USH patients experienced improvements in PTA and speech perception and expression outcomes after CI, as well as improvements in phonological memory and quality of life measures. Overall, patients implanted at younger ages outperformed older patients in audiological testing. Similarly, patients with prolonged auditory deprivation had relatively poor performance outcomes in sentence recognition and speech detection following CI. Conclusions: Most USH patients benefit from CI. USH patients who undergo CI at younger ages generally achieve better hearing, speech, and cognitive outcomes. CI at older ages can still prove beneficial if appropriate auditory amplification is started at the right time. Further research is warranted to fill the gap in understanding regarding the gene mutations underlying the pathophysiology of USH that have favorable CI outcomes as well as the optimal time to perform CI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8267700 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82677002021-07-10 The Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Usher Syndrome: A Systematic Review Davies, Camron Bergman, Jenna Misztal, Carly Ramchandran, Renuka Mittal, Jeenu Bulut, Erdogan Shah, Viraj Mittal, Rahul Eshraghi, Adrien A. J Clin Med Review Objective: To systematically appraise the implementation of cochlear implantation (CI) in Usher Syndrome (USH) Types 1, 2, and 3 patients, and analyze who would benefit from CI. Data Sources: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library electronic databases from inception through June 2020 was performed. There were no language restrictions. Study Selection: The PRISMA strategy was followed. Included studies discuss USH patients who underwent CI regardless of age, nationality, or clinical subtype. All included studies report post-implantation functional, cognitive, or quality of life outcomes. Only reviews were excluded. Results: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. USH patients experienced improvements in PTA and speech perception and expression outcomes after CI, as well as improvements in phonological memory and quality of life measures. Overall, patients implanted at younger ages outperformed older patients in audiological testing. Similarly, patients with prolonged auditory deprivation had relatively poor performance outcomes in sentence recognition and speech detection following CI. Conclusions: Most USH patients benefit from CI. USH patients who undergo CI at younger ages generally achieve better hearing, speech, and cognitive outcomes. CI at older ages can still prove beneficial if appropriate auditory amplification is started at the right time. Further research is warranted to fill the gap in understanding regarding the gene mutations underlying the pathophysiology of USH that have favorable CI outcomes as well as the optimal time to perform CI. MDPI 2021-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8267700/ /pubmed/34209904 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132915 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Davies, Camron Bergman, Jenna Misztal, Carly Ramchandran, Renuka Mittal, Jeenu Bulut, Erdogan Shah, Viraj Mittal, Rahul Eshraghi, Adrien A. The Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Usher Syndrome: A Systematic Review |
title | The Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Usher Syndrome: A Systematic Review |
title_full | The Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Usher Syndrome: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | The Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Usher Syndrome: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Usher Syndrome: A Systematic Review |
title_short | The Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Usher Syndrome: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | outcomes of cochlear implantation in usher syndrome: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8267700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34209904 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132915 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daviescamron theoutcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview AT bergmanjenna theoutcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview AT misztalcarly theoutcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview AT ramchandranrenuka theoutcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview AT mittaljeenu theoutcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview AT buluterdogan theoutcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview AT shahviraj theoutcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview AT mittalrahul theoutcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview AT eshraghiadriena theoutcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview AT daviescamron outcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview AT bergmanjenna outcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview AT misztalcarly outcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview AT ramchandranrenuka outcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview AT mittaljeenu outcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview AT buluterdogan outcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview AT shahviraj outcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview AT mittalrahul outcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview AT eshraghiadriena outcomesofcochlearimplantationinushersyndromeasystematicreview |