Cargando…

Outcomes of Universal Newborn Screening Programs: Systematic Review

Background: This systematic review examined the outcomes (age of identification and intervention, developmental outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and adverse effects on parents) of universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) for children with permanent congenital hearing loss (PCHL). Materials and method...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoshinaga-Itano, Christine, Manchaiah, Vinaya, Hunnicutt, Cynthia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8268039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34202909
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132784
_version_ 1783720272677830656
author Yoshinaga-Itano, Christine
Manchaiah, Vinaya
Hunnicutt, Cynthia
author_facet Yoshinaga-Itano, Christine
Manchaiah, Vinaya
Hunnicutt, Cynthia
author_sort Yoshinaga-Itano, Christine
collection PubMed
description Background: This systematic review examined the outcomes (age of identification and intervention, developmental outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and adverse effects on parents) of universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) for children with permanent congenital hearing loss (PCHL). Materials and methods: Multiple electronic databases were interrogated in March and April 2020 with further reports identified from article citations and unpublished literature. UNHS reports in English with comparisons of outcomes of infants who were not screened, and infants identified through other hearing screening programs. Results: 30 eligible reports from 14 populations with 7,325,138 infants screened through UNHS from 1616 non-duplicate references were included. UNHS results in a lower age of identification, amplification, and the initiation of early intervention services and better language/literacy development. Better speech perception/production were shown in younger, but not in older, children with early identification after UNHS. No significant findings were found for behavior problems and quality of life. UNHS was found to be cost-effective in terms of savings to society. In addition, no significant parental harm was noted as a result of UNHS. Conclusions: In highly developed countries, significantly better outcomes were found for children identified early through UNHS programs. Early language development predicts later literacy and language development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8268039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82680392021-07-10 Outcomes of Universal Newborn Screening Programs: Systematic Review Yoshinaga-Itano, Christine Manchaiah, Vinaya Hunnicutt, Cynthia J Clin Med Review Background: This systematic review examined the outcomes (age of identification and intervention, developmental outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and adverse effects on parents) of universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) for children with permanent congenital hearing loss (PCHL). Materials and methods: Multiple electronic databases were interrogated in March and April 2020 with further reports identified from article citations and unpublished literature. UNHS reports in English with comparisons of outcomes of infants who were not screened, and infants identified through other hearing screening programs. Results: 30 eligible reports from 14 populations with 7,325,138 infants screened through UNHS from 1616 non-duplicate references were included. UNHS results in a lower age of identification, amplification, and the initiation of early intervention services and better language/literacy development. Better speech perception/production were shown in younger, but not in older, children with early identification after UNHS. No significant findings were found for behavior problems and quality of life. UNHS was found to be cost-effective in terms of savings to society. In addition, no significant parental harm was noted as a result of UNHS. Conclusions: In highly developed countries, significantly better outcomes were found for children identified early through UNHS programs. Early language development predicts later literacy and language development. MDPI 2021-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8268039/ /pubmed/34202909 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132784 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Yoshinaga-Itano, Christine
Manchaiah, Vinaya
Hunnicutt, Cynthia
Outcomes of Universal Newborn Screening Programs: Systematic Review
title Outcomes of Universal Newborn Screening Programs: Systematic Review
title_full Outcomes of Universal Newborn Screening Programs: Systematic Review
title_fullStr Outcomes of Universal Newborn Screening Programs: Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of Universal Newborn Screening Programs: Systematic Review
title_short Outcomes of Universal Newborn Screening Programs: Systematic Review
title_sort outcomes of universal newborn screening programs: systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8268039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34202909
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132784
work_keys_str_mv AT yoshinagaitanochristine outcomesofuniversalnewbornscreeningprogramssystematicreview
AT manchaiahvinaya outcomesofuniversalnewbornscreeningprogramssystematicreview
AT hunnicuttcynthia outcomesofuniversalnewbornscreeningprogramssystematicreview