Cargando…

Effects of External Laryngeal Manipulation on Cervical Spine Motion during Videolaryngoscopic Intubation under Manual In-Line Stabilization: A Randomized Crossover Trial

We hypothesized that external laryngeal manipulation would reduce cervical spine motion during video laryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization by reducing the force required to lift the videolaryngoscope. In this randomized crossover trial, 27 neurointerventional patients underwent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Yoon Jung, Hur, Chahnmee, Yoon, Hyun-Kyu, Lee, Hyung-Chul, Park, Hee-Pyoung, Oh, Hyongmin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8268206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34208825
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132931
_version_ 1783720307125649408
author Kim, Yoon Jung
Hur, Chahnmee
Yoon, Hyun-Kyu
Lee, Hyung-Chul
Park, Hee-Pyoung
Oh, Hyongmin
author_facet Kim, Yoon Jung
Hur, Chahnmee
Yoon, Hyun-Kyu
Lee, Hyung-Chul
Park, Hee-Pyoung
Oh, Hyongmin
author_sort Kim, Yoon Jung
collection PubMed
description We hypothesized that external laryngeal manipulation would reduce cervical spine motion during video laryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization by reducing the force required to lift the videolaryngoscope. In this randomized crossover trial, 27 neurointerventional patients underwent two consecutive videolaryngoscopic intubation attempts under manual in-line stabilization. External laryngeal manipulation was applied to all patients in either the first or second attempt. In the second attempt, we tried to reproduce the percentage of glottic opening score obtained in the first attempt. Primary outcomes were cervical spine motion during intubation at the occiput-C1, C1–C2, and C2–C5 segments. The intubation success rate (secondary outcome measure) was recorded. Cervical spine motion during intubation at the occiput-C1 segment was significantly smaller with than without external laryngeal manipulation (7.4° ± 4.6° vs. 11.5° ± 4.8°, mean difference −4.1° (98.33% confidence interval −5.8° to −2.3°), p < 0.001), showing a reduction of 35.7%. Cervical spine motion during intubation at the other segments was not significantly different with versus without external laryngeal manipulation. All intubations were achieved successfully regardless of the application of external laryngeal manipulation. External laryngeal manipulation is a useful method to reduce upper cervical spine motion during videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8268206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82682062021-07-10 Effects of External Laryngeal Manipulation on Cervical Spine Motion during Videolaryngoscopic Intubation under Manual In-Line Stabilization: A Randomized Crossover Trial Kim, Yoon Jung Hur, Chahnmee Yoon, Hyun-Kyu Lee, Hyung-Chul Park, Hee-Pyoung Oh, Hyongmin J Clin Med Article We hypothesized that external laryngeal manipulation would reduce cervical spine motion during video laryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization by reducing the force required to lift the videolaryngoscope. In this randomized crossover trial, 27 neurointerventional patients underwent two consecutive videolaryngoscopic intubation attempts under manual in-line stabilization. External laryngeal manipulation was applied to all patients in either the first or second attempt. In the second attempt, we tried to reproduce the percentage of glottic opening score obtained in the first attempt. Primary outcomes were cervical spine motion during intubation at the occiput-C1, C1–C2, and C2–C5 segments. The intubation success rate (secondary outcome measure) was recorded. Cervical spine motion during intubation at the occiput-C1 segment was significantly smaller with than without external laryngeal manipulation (7.4° ± 4.6° vs. 11.5° ± 4.8°, mean difference −4.1° (98.33% confidence interval −5.8° to −2.3°), p < 0.001), showing a reduction of 35.7%. Cervical spine motion during intubation at the other segments was not significantly different with versus without external laryngeal manipulation. All intubations were achieved successfully regardless of the application of external laryngeal manipulation. External laryngeal manipulation is a useful method to reduce upper cervical spine motion during videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization. MDPI 2021-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8268206/ /pubmed/34208825 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132931 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kim, Yoon Jung
Hur, Chahnmee
Yoon, Hyun-Kyu
Lee, Hyung-Chul
Park, Hee-Pyoung
Oh, Hyongmin
Effects of External Laryngeal Manipulation on Cervical Spine Motion during Videolaryngoscopic Intubation under Manual In-Line Stabilization: A Randomized Crossover Trial
title Effects of External Laryngeal Manipulation on Cervical Spine Motion during Videolaryngoscopic Intubation under Manual In-Line Stabilization: A Randomized Crossover Trial
title_full Effects of External Laryngeal Manipulation on Cervical Spine Motion during Videolaryngoscopic Intubation under Manual In-Line Stabilization: A Randomized Crossover Trial
title_fullStr Effects of External Laryngeal Manipulation on Cervical Spine Motion during Videolaryngoscopic Intubation under Manual In-Line Stabilization: A Randomized Crossover Trial
title_full_unstemmed Effects of External Laryngeal Manipulation on Cervical Spine Motion during Videolaryngoscopic Intubation under Manual In-Line Stabilization: A Randomized Crossover Trial
title_short Effects of External Laryngeal Manipulation on Cervical Spine Motion during Videolaryngoscopic Intubation under Manual In-Line Stabilization: A Randomized Crossover Trial
title_sort effects of external laryngeal manipulation on cervical spine motion during videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization: a randomized crossover trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8268206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34208825
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132931
work_keys_str_mv AT kimyoonjung effectsofexternallaryngealmanipulationoncervicalspinemotionduringvideolaryngoscopicintubationundermanualinlinestabilizationarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT hurchahnmee effectsofexternallaryngealmanipulationoncervicalspinemotionduringvideolaryngoscopicintubationundermanualinlinestabilizationarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT yoonhyunkyu effectsofexternallaryngealmanipulationoncervicalspinemotionduringvideolaryngoscopicintubationundermanualinlinestabilizationarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT leehyungchul effectsofexternallaryngealmanipulationoncervicalspinemotionduringvideolaryngoscopicintubationundermanualinlinestabilizationarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT parkheepyoung effectsofexternallaryngealmanipulationoncervicalspinemotionduringvideolaryngoscopicintubationundermanualinlinestabilizationarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT ohhyongmin effectsofexternallaryngealmanipulationoncervicalspinemotionduringvideolaryngoscopicintubationundermanualinlinestabilizationarandomizedcrossovertrial