Cargando…
Effects of External Laryngeal Manipulation on Cervical Spine Motion during Videolaryngoscopic Intubation under Manual In-Line Stabilization: A Randomized Crossover Trial
We hypothesized that external laryngeal manipulation would reduce cervical spine motion during video laryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization by reducing the force required to lift the videolaryngoscope. In this randomized crossover trial, 27 neurointerventional patients underwent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8268206/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34208825 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132931 |
_version_ | 1783720307125649408 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Yoon Jung Hur, Chahnmee Yoon, Hyun-Kyu Lee, Hyung-Chul Park, Hee-Pyoung Oh, Hyongmin |
author_facet | Kim, Yoon Jung Hur, Chahnmee Yoon, Hyun-Kyu Lee, Hyung-Chul Park, Hee-Pyoung Oh, Hyongmin |
author_sort | Kim, Yoon Jung |
collection | PubMed |
description | We hypothesized that external laryngeal manipulation would reduce cervical spine motion during video laryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization by reducing the force required to lift the videolaryngoscope. In this randomized crossover trial, 27 neurointerventional patients underwent two consecutive videolaryngoscopic intubation attempts under manual in-line stabilization. External laryngeal manipulation was applied to all patients in either the first or second attempt. In the second attempt, we tried to reproduce the percentage of glottic opening score obtained in the first attempt. Primary outcomes were cervical spine motion during intubation at the occiput-C1, C1–C2, and C2–C5 segments. The intubation success rate (secondary outcome measure) was recorded. Cervical spine motion during intubation at the occiput-C1 segment was significantly smaller with than without external laryngeal manipulation (7.4° ± 4.6° vs. 11.5° ± 4.8°, mean difference −4.1° (98.33% confidence interval −5.8° to −2.3°), p < 0.001), showing a reduction of 35.7%. Cervical spine motion during intubation at the other segments was not significantly different with versus without external laryngeal manipulation. All intubations were achieved successfully regardless of the application of external laryngeal manipulation. External laryngeal manipulation is a useful method to reduce upper cervical spine motion during videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8268206 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82682062021-07-10 Effects of External Laryngeal Manipulation on Cervical Spine Motion during Videolaryngoscopic Intubation under Manual In-Line Stabilization: A Randomized Crossover Trial Kim, Yoon Jung Hur, Chahnmee Yoon, Hyun-Kyu Lee, Hyung-Chul Park, Hee-Pyoung Oh, Hyongmin J Clin Med Article We hypothesized that external laryngeal manipulation would reduce cervical spine motion during video laryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization by reducing the force required to lift the videolaryngoscope. In this randomized crossover trial, 27 neurointerventional patients underwent two consecutive videolaryngoscopic intubation attempts under manual in-line stabilization. External laryngeal manipulation was applied to all patients in either the first or second attempt. In the second attempt, we tried to reproduce the percentage of glottic opening score obtained in the first attempt. Primary outcomes were cervical spine motion during intubation at the occiput-C1, C1–C2, and C2–C5 segments. The intubation success rate (secondary outcome measure) was recorded. Cervical spine motion during intubation at the occiput-C1 segment was significantly smaller with than without external laryngeal manipulation (7.4° ± 4.6° vs. 11.5° ± 4.8°, mean difference −4.1° (98.33% confidence interval −5.8° to −2.3°), p < 0.001), showing a reduction of 35.7%. Cervical spine motion during intubation at the other segments was not significantly different with versus without external laryngeal manipulation. All intubations were achieved successfully regardless of the application of external laryngeal manipulation. External laryngeal manipulation is a useful method to reduce upper cervical spine motion during videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization. MDPI 2021-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8268206/ /pubmed/34208825 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132931 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kim, Yoon Jung Hur, Chahnmee Yoon, Hyun-Kyu Lee, Hyung-Chul Park, Hee-Pyoung Oh, Hyongmin Effects of External Laryngeal Manipulation on Cervical Spine Motion during Videolaryngoscopic Intubation under Manual In-Line Stabilization: A Randomized Crossover Trial |
title | Effects of External Laryngeal Manipulation on Cervical Spine Motion during Videolaryngoscopic Intubation under Manual In-Line Stabilization: A Randomized Crossover Trial |
title_full | Effects of External Laryngeal Manipulation on Cervical Spine Motion during Videolaryngoscopic Intubation under Manual In-Line Stabilization: A Randomized Crossover Trial |
title_fullStr | Effects of External Laryngeal Manipulation on Cervical Spine Motion during Videolaryngoscopic Intubation under Manual In-Line Stabilization: A Randomized Crossover Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of External Laryngeal Manipulation on Cervical Spine Motion during Videolaryngoscopic Intubation under Manual In-Line Stabilization: A Randomized Crossover Trial |
title_short | Effects of External Laryngeal Manipulation on Cervical Spine Motion during Videolaryngoscopic Intubation under Manual In-Line Stabilization: A Randomized Crossover Trial |
title_sort | effects of external laryngeal manipulation on cervical spine motion during videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization: a randomized crossover trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8268206/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34208825 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132931 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimyoonjung effectsofexternallaryngealmanipulationoncervicalspinemotionduringvideolaryngoscopicintubationundermanualinlinestabilizationarandomizedcrossovertrial AT hurchahnmee effectsofexternallaryngealmanipulationoncervicalspinemotionduringvideolaryngoscopicintubationundermanualinlinestabilizationarandomizedcrossovertrial AT yoonhyunkyu effectsofexternallaryngealmanipulationoncervicalspinemotionduringvideolaryngoscopicintubationundermanualinlinestabilizationarandomizedcrossovertrial AT leehyungchul effectsofexternallaryngealmanipulationoncervicalspinemotionduringvideolaryngoscopicintubationundermanualinlinestabilizationarandomizedcrossovertrial AT parkheepyoung effectsofexternallaryngealmanipulationoncervicalspinemotionduringvideolaryngoscopicintubationundermanualinlinestabilizationarandomizedcrossovertrial AT ohhyongmin effectsofexternallaryngealmanipulationoncervicalspinemotionduringvideolaryngoscopicintubationundermanualinlinestabilizationarandomizedcrossovertrial |