Cargando…
Exploration of the Supraspinal Hypotheses about Spinal Cord Stimulation and Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation: A Systematic Review
Despite the established efficacy and effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS), there is still no consensus on the supraspinal mechanisms of action of this therapy. The purpose of this study was to systematically review previously raised hypotheses concerning supraspinal mechanisms of action of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8268298/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34201877 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132766 |
_version_ | 1783720325434834944 |
---|---|
author | Goudman, Lisa De Groote, Sander Linderoth, Bengt De Smedt, Ann Eldabe, Sam Duarte, Rui V. Moens, Maarten |
author_facet | Goudman, Lisa De Groote, Sander Linderoth, Bengt De Smedt, Ann Eldabe, Sam Duarte, Rui V. Moens, Maarten |
author_sort | Goudman, Lisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite the established efficacy and effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS), there is still no consensus on the supraspinal mechanisms of action of this therapy. The purpose of this study was to systematically review previously raised hypotheses concerning supraspinal mechanisms of action of SCS based on human, animal and computational studies. Searches were conducted using four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS and Web of Science), backward reference searching and consultation with experts. The study protocol was registered prior to initiation of the review process (PROSPERO CRD42020161531). A total of 54 publications were included, 21 of which were animal studies, and 33 were human studies. The supraspinal hypotheses (n = 69) identified from the included studies could be categorized into six groups concerning the proposed supraspinal hypothesis, namely descending pathways (n = 24); ascending medial pathway (n = 13); ascending lateral pathway (n = 10); affective/motivational influences (n = 8); spinal–cerebral (thalamic)-loop (n = 3) and miscellaneous (n = 11). Scientific support is provided for the hypotheses identified. Modulation of the descending nociceptive inhibitory pathways, medial and lateral pathways were the most frequently reported hypotheses about the supraspinal mechanisms of action of SCS. These hypotheses were mainly supported by studies with a high or moderate confidence in the body of evidence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8268298 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82682982021-07-10 Exploration of the Supraspinal Hypotheses about Spinal Cord Stimulation and Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation: A Systematic Review Goudman, Lisa De Groote, Sander Linderoth, Bengt De Smedt, Ann Eldabe, Sam Duarte, Rui V. Moens, Maarten J Clin Med Review Despite the established efficacy and effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS), there is still no consensus on the supraspinal mechanisms of action of this therapy. The purpose of this study was to systematically review previously raised hypotheses concerning supraspinal mechanisms of action of SCS based on human, animal and computational studies. Searches were conducted using four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS and Web of Science), backward reference searching and consultation with experts. The study protocol was registered prior to initiation of the review process (PROSPERO CRD42020161531). A total of 54 publications were included, 21 of which were animal studies, and 33 were human studies. The supraspinal hypotheses (n = 69) identified from the included studies could be categorized into six groups concerning the proposed supraspinal hypothesis, namely descending pathways (n = 24); ascending medial pathway (n = 13); ascending lateral pathway (n = 10); affective/motivational influences (n = 8); spinal–cerebral (thalamic)-loop (n = 3) and miscellaneous (n = 11). Scientific support is provided for the hypotheses identified. Modulation of the descending nociceptive inhibitory pathways, medial and lateral pathways were the most frequently reported hypotheses about the supraspinal mechanisms of action of SCS. These hypotheses were mainly supported by studies with a high or moderate confidence in the body of evidence. MDPI 2021-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8268298/ /pubmed/34201877 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132766 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Goudman, Lisa De Groote, Sander Linderoth, Bengt De Smedt, Ann Eldabe, Sam Duarte, Rui V. Moens, Maarten Exploration of the Supraspinal Hypotheses about Spinal Cord Stimulation and Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation: A Systematic Review |
title | Exploration of the Supraspinal Hypotheses about Spinal Cord Stimulation and Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Exploration of the Supraspinal Hypotheses about Spinal Cord Stimulation and Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Exploration of the Supraspinal Hypotheses about Spinal Cord Stimulation and Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploration of the Supraspinal Hypotheses about Spinal Cord Stimulation and Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Exploration of the Supraspinal Hypotheses about Spinal Cord Stimulation and Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | exploration of the supraspinal hypotheses about spinal cord stimulation and dorsal root ganglion stimulation: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8268298/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34201877 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132766 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goudmanlisa explorationofthesupraspinalhypothesesaboutspinalcordstimulationanddorsalrootganglionstimulationasystematicreview AT degrootesander explorationofthesupraspinalhypothesesaboutspinalcordstimulationanddorsalrootganglionstimulationasystematicreview AT linderothbengt explorationofthesupraspinalhypothesesaboutspinalcordstimulationanddorsalrootganglionstimulationasystematicreview AT desmedtann explorationofthesupraspinalhypothesesaboutspinalcordstimulationanddorsalrootganglionstimulationasystematicreview AT eldabesam explorationofthesupraspinalhypothesesaboutspinalcordstimulationanddorsalrootganglionstimulationasystematicreview AT duarteruiv explorationofthesupraspinalhypothesesaboutspinalcordstimulationanddorsalrootganglionstimulationasystematicreview AT moensmaarten explorationofthesupraspinalhypothesesaboutspinalcordstimulationanddorsalrootganglionstimulationasystematicreview |