Cargando…

Exploration of the Supraspinal Hypotheses about Spinal Cord Stimulation and Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation: A Systematic Review

Despite the established efficacy and effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS), there is still no consensus on the supraspinal mechanisms of action of this therapy. The purpose of this study was to systematically review previously raised hypotheses concerning supraspinal mechanisms of action of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goudman, Lisa, De Groote, Sander, Linderoth, Bengt, De Smedt, Ann, Eldabe, Sam, Duarte, Rui V., Moens, Maarten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8268298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34201877
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132766
_version_ 1783720325434834944
author Goudman, Lisa
De Groote, Sander
Linderoth, Bengt
De Smedt, Ann
Eldabe, Sam
Duarte, Rui V.
Moens, Maarten
author_facet Goudman, Lisa
De Groote, Sander
Linderoth, Bengt
De Smedt, Ann
Eldabe, Sam
Duarte, Rui V.
Moens, Maarten
author_sort Goudman, Lisa
collection PubMed
description Despite the established efficacy and effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS), there is still no consensus on the supraspinal mechanisms of action of this therapy. The purpose of this study was to systematically review previously raised hypotheses concerning supraspinal mechanisms of action of SCS based on human, animal and computational studies. Searches were conducted using four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS and Web of Science), backward reference searching and consultation with experts. The study protocol was registered prior to initiation of the review process (PROSPERO CRD42020161531). A total of 54 publications were included, 21 of which were animal studies, and 33 were human studies. The supraspinal hypotheses (n = 69) identified from the included studies could be categorized into six groups concerning the proposed supraspinal hypothesis, namely descending pathways (n = 24); ascending medial pathway (n = 13); ascending lateral pathway (n = 10); affective/motivational influences (n = 8); spinal–cerebral (thalamic)-loop (n = 3) and miscellaneous (n = 11). Scientific support is provided for the hypotheses identified. Modulation of the descending nociceptive inhibitory pathways, medial and lateral pathways were the most frequently reported hypotheses about the supraspinal mechanisms of action of SCS. These hypotheses were mainly supported by studies with a high or moderate confidence in the body of evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8268298
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82682982021-07-10 Exploration of the Supraspinal Hypotheses about Spinal Cord Stimulation and Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation: A Systematic Review Goudman, Lisa De Groote, Sander Linderoth, Bengt De Smedt, Ann Eldabe, Sam Duarte, Rui V. Moens, Maarten J Clin Med Review Despite the established efficacy and effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS), there is still no consensus on the supraspinal mechanisms of action of this therapy. The purpose of this study was to systematically review previously raised hypotheses concerning supraspinal mechanisms of action of SCS based on human, animal and computational studies. Searches were conducted using four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS and Web of Science), backward reference searching and consultation with experts. The study protocol was registered prior to initiation of the review process (PROSPERO CRD42020161531). A total of 54 publications were included, 21 of which were animal studies, and 33 were human studies. The supraspinal hypotheses (n = 69) identified from the included studies could be categorized into six groups concerning the proposed supraspinal hypothesis, namely descending pathways (n = 24); ascending medial pathway (n = 13); ascending lateral pathway (n = 10); affective/motivational influences (n = 8); spinal–cerebral (thalamic)-loop (n = 3) and miscellaneous (n = 11). Scientific support is provided for the hypotheses identified. Modulation of the descending nociceptive inhibitory pathways, medial and lateral pathways were the most frequently reported hypotheses about the supraspinal mechanisms of action of SCS. These hypotheses were mainly supported by studies with a high or moderate confidence in the body of evidence. MDPI 2021-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8268298/ /pubmed/34201877 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132766 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Goudman, Lisa
De Groote, Sander
Linderoth, Bengt
De Smedt, Ann
Eldabe, Sam
Duarte, Rui V.
Moens, Maarten
Exploration of the Supraspinal Hypotheses about Spinal Cord Stimulation and Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation: A Systematic Review
title Exploration of the Supraspinal Hypotheses about Spinal Cord Stimulation and Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation: A Systematic Review
title_full Exploration of the Supraspinal Hypotheses about Spinal Cord Stimulation and Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Exploration of the Supraspinal Hypotheses about Spinal Cord Stimulation and Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Exploration of the Supraspinal Hypotheses about Spinal Cord Stimulation and Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation: A Systematic Review
title_short Exploration of the Supraspinal Hypotheses about Spinal Cord Stimulation and Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation: A Systematic Review
title_sort exploration of the supraspinal hypotheses about spinal cord stimulation and dorsal root ganglion stimulation: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8268298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34201877
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132766
work_keys_str_mv AT goudmanlisa explorationofthesupraspinalhypothesesaboutspinalcordstimulationanddorsalrootganglionstimulationasystematicreview
AT degrootesander explorationofthesupraspinalhypothesesaboutspinalcordstimulationanddorsalrootganglionstimulationasystematicreview
AT linderothbengt explorationofthesupraspinalhypothesesaboutspinalcordstimulationanddorsalrootganglionstimulationasystematicreview
AT desmedtann explorationofthesupraspinalhypothesesaboutspinalcordstimulationanddorsalrootganglionstimulationasystematicreview
AT eldabesam explorationofthesupraspinalhypothesesaboutspinalcordstimulationanddorsalrootganglionstimulationasystematicreview
AT duarteruiv explorationofthesupraspinalhypothesesaboutspinalcordstimulationanddorsalrootganglionstimulationasystematicreview
AT moensmaarten explorationofthesupraspinalhypothesesaboutspinalcordstimulationanddorsalrootganglionstimulationasystematicreview