Cargando…
The Treatment Gap in Osteoporosis
Worldwide, there are millions of people who have been diagnosed with osteoporosis, a bone disease that increases the risk of fracture due to low bone mineral density and deterioration of bone architecture. In the US alone, there are approximately ten million men and women diagnosed with osteoporosis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8268346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34279485 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10133002 |
_version_ | 1783720336978608128 |
---|---|
author | Ayub, Nazia Faraj, Malak Ghatan, Sam Reijers, Joannes A. A. Napoli, Nicola Oei, Ling |
author_facet | Ayub, Nazia Faraj, Malak Ghatan, Sam Reijers, Joannes A. A. Napoli, Nicola Oei, Ling |
author_sort | Ayub, Nazia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Worldwide, there are millions of people who have been diagnosed with osteoporosis, a bone disease that increases the risk of fracture due to low bone mineral density and deterioration of bone architecture. In the US alone, there are approximately ten million men and women diagnosed with osteoporosis and this number is still growing. Diagnosis is made by measuring bone mineral density. Medications used for the treatment of osteoporosis are bisphosphonates, denosumab, raloxifene, and teriparatide. Recently, romosozumab has been added as well. In recent years, a number of advances have been made in the field of diagnostic methods and the diverse treatment options for osteoporosis. Despite these advances and a growing incidence of osteoporosis, there is a large group being left undertreated or even untreated. This group of the under/untreated has been called the treatment gap. Concerns regarding rare side effects of the medications, such as osteonecrosis of the jaw, have been reported to be one of the many causes for the treatment gap. Also, this group seems not to be sufficiently informed of the major benefits of the treatment and the diversity in treatment options. Knowledge of these could be very helpful in improving compliance and hopefully reducing the gap. In this paper, we summarize recent evidence regarding the efficacy of the various treatment options, potential side effects, and the overall benefit of treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8268346 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82683462021-07-10 The Treatment Gap in Osteoporosis Ayub, Nazia Faraj, Malak Ghatan, Sam Reijers, Joannes A. A. Napoli, Nicola Oei, Ling J Clin Med Review Worldwide, there are millions of people who have been diagnosed with osteoporosis, a bone disease that increases the risk of fracture due to low bone mineral density and deterioration of bone architecture. In the US alone, there are approximately ten million men and women diagnosed with osteoporosis and this number is still growing. Diagnosis is made by measuring bone mineral density. Medications used for the treatment of osteoporosis are bisphosphonates, denosumab, raloxifene, and teriparatide. Recently, romosozumab has been added as well. In recent years, a number of advances have been made in the field of diagnostic methods and the diverse treatment options for osteoporosis. Despite these advances and a growing incidence of osteoporosis, there is a large group being left undertreated or even untreated. This group of the under/untreated has been called the treatment gap. Concerns regarding rare side effects of the medications, such as osteonecrosis of the jaw, have been reported to be one of the many causes for the treatment gap. Also, this group seems not to be sufficiently informed of the major benefits of the treatment and the diversity in treatment options. Knowledge of these could be very helpful in improving compliance and hopefully reducing the gap. In this paper, we summarize recent evidence regarding the efficacy of the various treatment options, potential side effects, and the overall benefit of treatment. MDPI 2021-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8268346/ /pubmed/34279485 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10133002 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Ayub, Nazia Faraj, Malak Ghatan, Sam Reijers, Joannes A. A. Napoli, Nicola Oei, Ling The Treatment Gap in Osteoporosis |
title | The Treatment Gap in Osteoporosis |
title_full | The Treatment Gap in Osteoporosis |
title_fullStr | The Treatment Gap in Osteoporosis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Treatment Gap in Osteoporosis |
title_short | The Treatment Gap in Osteoporosis |
title_sort | treatment gap in osteoporosis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8268346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34279485 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10133002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ayubnazia thetreatmentgapinosteoporosis AT farajmalak thetreatmentgapinosteoporosis AT ghatansam thetreatmentgapinosteoporosis AT reijersjoannesaa thetreatmentgapinosteoporosis AT napolinicola thetreatmentgapinosteoporosis AT oeiling thetreatmentgapinosteoporosis AT ayubnazia treatmentgapinosteoporosis AT farajmalak treatmentgapinosteoporosis AT ghatansam treatmentgapinosteoporosis AT reijersjoannesaa treatmentgapinosteoporosis AT napolinicola treatmentgapinosteoporosis AT oeiling treatmentgapinosteoporosis |