Cargando…

The Treatment Gap in Osteoporosis

Worldwide, there are millions of people who have been diagnosed with osteoporosis, a bone disease that increases the risk of fracture due to low bone mineral density and deterioration of bone architecture. In the US alone, there are approximately ten million men and women diagnosed with osteoporosis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ayub, Nazia, Faraj, Malak, Ghatan, Sam, Reijers, Joannes A. A., Napoli, Nicola, Oei, Ling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8268346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34279485
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10133002
_version_ 1783720336978608128
author Ayub, Nazia
Faraj, Malak
Ghatan, Sam
Reijers, Joannes A. A.
Napoli, Nicola
Oei, Ling
author_facet Ayub, Nazia
Faraj, Malak
Ghatan, Sam
Reijers, Joannes A. A.
Napoli, Nicola
Oei, Ling
author_sort Ayub, Nazia
collection PubMed
description Worldwide, there are millions of people who have been diagnosed with osteoporosis, a bone disease that increases the risk of fracture due to low bone mineral density and deterioration of bone architecture. In the US alone, there are approximately ten million men and women diagnosed with osteoporosis and this number is still growing. Diagnosis is made by measuring bone mineral density. Medications used for the treatment of osteoporosis are bisphosphonates, denosumab, raloxifene, and teriparatide. Recently, romosozumab has been added as well. In recent years, a number of advances have been made in the field of diagnostic methods and the diverse treatment options for osteoporosis. Despite these advances and a growing incidence of osteoporosis, there is a large group being left undertreated or even untreated. This group of the under/untreated has been called the treatment gap. Concerns regarding rare side effects of the medications, such as osteonecrosis of the jaw, have been reported to be one of the many causes for the treatment gap. Also, this group seems not to be sufficiently informed of the major benefits of the treatment and the diversity in treatment options. Knowledge of these could be very helpful in improving compliance and hopefully reducing the gap. In this paper, we summarize recent evidence regarding the efficacy of the various treatment options, potential side effects, and the overall benefit of treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8268346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82683462021-07-10 The Treatment Gap in Osteoporosis Ayub, Nazia Faraj, Malak Ghatan, Sam Reijers, Joannes A. A. Napoli, Nicola Oei, Ling J Clin Med Review Worldwide, there are millions of people who have been diagnosed with osteoporosis, a bone disease that increases the risk of fracture due to low bone mineral density and deterioration of bone architecture. In the US alone, there are approximately ten million men and women diagnosed with osteoporosis and this number is still growing. Diagnosis is made by measuring bone mineral density. Medications used for the treatment of osteoporosis are bisphosphonates, denosumab, raloxifene, and teriparatide. Recently, romosozumab has been added as well. In recent years, a number of advances have been made in the field of diagnostic methods and the diverse treatment options for osteoporosis. Despite these advances and a growing incidence of osteoporosis, there is a large group being left undertreated or even untreated. This group of the under/untreated has been called the treatment gap. Concerns regarding rare side effects of the medications, such as osteonecrosis of the jaw, have been reported to be one of the many causes for the treatment gap. Also, this group seems not to be sufficiently informed of the major benefits of the treatment and the diversity in treatment options. Knowledge of these could be very helpful in improving compliance and hopefully reducing the gap. In this paper, we summarize recent evidence regarding the efficacy of the various treatment options, potential side effects, and the overall benefit of treatment. MDPI 2021-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8268346/ /pubmed/34279485 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10133002 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Ayub, Nazia
Faraj, Malak
Ghatan, Sam
Reijers, Joannes A. A.
Napoli, Nicola
Oei, Ling
The Treatment Gap in Osteoporosis
title The Treatment Gap in Osteoporosis
title_full The Treatment Gap in Osteoporosis
title_fullStr The Treatment Gap in Osteoporosis
title_full_unstemmed The Treatment Gap in Osteoporosis
title_short The Treatment Gap in Osteoporosis
title_sort treatment gap in osteoporosis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8268346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34279485
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10133002
work_keys_str_mv AT ayubnazia thetreatmentgapinosteoporosis
AT farajmalak thetreatmentgapinosteoporosis
AT ghatansam thetreatmentgapinosteoporosis
AT reijersjoannesaa thetreatmentgapinosteoporosis
AT napolinicola thetreatmentgapinosteoporosis
AT oeiling thetreatmentgapinosteoporosis
AT ayubnazia treatmentgapinosteoporosis
AT farajmalak treatmentgapinosteoporosis
AT ghatansam treatmentgapinosteoporosis
AT reijersjoannesaa treatmentgapinosteoporosis
AT napolinicola treatmentgapinosteoporosis
AT oeiling treatmentgapinosteoporosis