Cargando…

Analysis of the Referral Rates of Newborn Hearing Screening Test According to Childbirth Delivery Methods in Neonatal Care Units

It is known that neonates born by cesarean delivery (CD) may have higher referral rates than those born by vaginal delivery (VD) for newborn hearing screening (NHS). False-positive NHS results can increase costs and parental anxiety. This study analyzed the differences in NHS referral rates accordin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seo, Ganghyeon, Choi, Hyo Geun, Jang, Sookyung, Choi, Sun, Lee, Sa Ra, Park, Su-Kyoung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8268358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34210006
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132923
_version_ 1783720339962855424
author Seo, Ganghyeon
Choi, Hyo Geun
Jang, Sookyung
Choi, Sun
Lee, Sa Ra
Park, Su-Kyoung
author_facet Seo, Ganghyeon
Choi, Hyo Geun
Jang, Sookyung
Choi, Sun
Lee, Sa Ra
Park, Su-Kyoung
author_sort Seo, Ganghyeon
collection PubMed
description It is known that neonates born by cesarean delivery (CD) may have higher referral rates than those born by vaginal delivery (VD) for newborn hearing screening (NHS). False-positive NHS results can increase costs and parental anxiety. This study analyzed the differences in NHS referral rates according to delivery methods in Level I, II, and III neonatal care units. A retrospective chart review was done for 2322 infants (4644 ears) with delivery records who underwent NHS between 2004 and 2017. The first NHS was performed immediately before discharge when the infant was in good condition via the automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) or automated otoacoustic emissions (AOAE). There were 98 neonates (196 ears) who underwent both AABR and AOAE simultaneously as the first NHS, 30 of which failed. We used a total of 4810 ears in this analysis. Of all enrolled ears, 2075 ears were of neonates born by CD, and 2735 ears were of neonates born by VD. A total of 2460 ears were from patients in Level III neonatal intensive care units (NICU) and 2350 ears were from Level I and II neonatal care units. The overall referral rate was higher in infants born via CD (4.5%) than VD (3.2%). In Level I and II neonatal intensive care units, the referral rate was significantly higher in those born via CD (3.0%) than via VD (1.4%). Further, based on the screening method, AABR (75.8%) was more frequently used than AOAE (24.2%), thereby revealing AABR’s higher referral rate in CD (2.9%) than in VD (1.2%). The referral rate of infants who underwent the NHS within three days of birth was higher in the CD group (3.0%) than in the VD group (1.3%). There was no significant difference in the referral rate depending on the delivery method when infants were hospitalized for more than four days or hospitalized in the NICU. The referral rate according to the delivery methods was significantly higher when the NHS test was performed for healthy newborns in the Level I and II neonatal care units born by CD within 72 h using AABR. Therefore, we recommend that the hearing screening test for newborns delivered by cesarean section be performed after 72 h of age. The results of this study may reduce the false-positive NHS results, unnecessary further tests, and parental anxiety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8268358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82683582021-07-10 Analysis of the Referral Rates of Newborn Hearing Screening Test According to Childbirth Delivery Methods in Neonatal Care Units Seo, Ganghyeon Choi, Hyo Geun Jang, Sookyung Choi, Sun Lee, Sa Ra Park, Su-Kyoung J Clin Med Article It is known that neonates born by cesarean delivery (CD) may have higher referral rates than those born by vaginal delivery (VD) for newborn hearing screening (NHS). False-positive NHS results can increase costs and parental anxiety. This study analyzed the differences in NHS referral rates according to delivery methods in Level I, II, and III neonatal care units. A retrospective chart review was done for 2322 infants (4644 ears) with delivery records who underwent NHS between 2004 and 2017. The first NHS was performed immediately before discharge when the infant was in good condition via the automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) or automated otoacoustic emissions (AOAE). There were 98 neonates (196 ears) who underwent both AABR and AOAE simultaneously as the first NHS, 30 of which failed. We used a total of 4810 ears in this analysis. Of all enrolled ears, 2075 ears were of neonates born by CD, and 2735 ears were of neonates born by VD. A total of 2460 ears were from patients in Level III neonatal intensive care units (NICU) and 2350 ears were from Level I and II neonatal care units. The overall referral rate was higher in infants born via CD (4.5%) than VD (3.2%). In Level I and II neonatal intensive care units, the referral rate was significantly higher in those born via CD (3.0%) than via VD (1.4%). Further, based on the screening method, AABR (75.8%) was more frequently used than AOAE (24.2%), thereby revealing AABR’s higher referral rate in CD (2.9%) than in VD (1.2%). The referral rate of infants who underwent the NHS within three days of birth was higher in the CD group (3.0%) than in the VD group (1.3%). There was no significant difference in the referral rate depending on the delivery method when infants were hospitalized for more than four days or hospitalized in the NICU. The referral rate according to the delivery methods was significantly higher when the NHS test was performed for healthy newborns in the Level I and II neonatal care units born by CD within 72 h using AABR. Therefore, we recommend that the hearing screening test for newborns delivered by cesarean section be performed after 72 h of age. The results of this study may reduce the false-positive NHS results, unnecessary further tests, and parental anxiety. MDPI 2021-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8268358/ /pubmed/34210006 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132923 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Seo, Ganghyeon
Choi, Hyo Geun
Jang, Sookyung
Choi, Sun
Lee, Sa Ra
Park, Su-Kyoung
Analysis of the Referral Rates of Newborn Hearing Screening Test According to Childbirth Delivery Methods in Neonatal Care Units
title Analysis of the Referral Rates of Newborn Hearing Screening Test According to Childbirth Delivery Methods in Neonatal Care Units
title_full Analysis of the Referral Rates of Newborn Hearing Screening Test According to Childbirth Delivery Methods in Neonatal Care Units
title_fullStr Analysis of the Referral Rates of Newborn Hearing Screening Test According to Childbirth Delivery Methods in Neonatal Care Units
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the Referral Rates of Newborn Hearing Screening Test According to Childbirth Delivery Methods in Neonatal Care Units
title_short Analysis of the Referral Rates of Newborn Hearing Screening Test According to Childbirth Delivery Methods in Neonatal Care Units
title_sort analysis of the referral rates of newborn hearing screening test according to childbirth delivery methods in neonatal care units
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8268358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34210006
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132923
work_keys_str_mv AT seoganghyeon analysisofthereferralratesofnewbornhearingscreeningtestaccordingtochildbirthdeliverymethodsinneonatalcareunits
AT choihyogeun analysisofthereferralratesofnewbornhearingscreeningtestaccordingtochildbirthdeliverymethodsinneonatalcareunits
AT jangsookyung analysisofthereferralratesofnewbornhearingscreeningtestaccordingtochildbirthdeliverymethodsinneonatalcareunits
AT choisun analysisofthereferralratesofnewbornhearingscreeningtestaccordingtochildbirthdeliverymethodsinneonatalcareunits
AT leesara analysisofthereferralratesofnewbornhearingscreeningtestaccordingtochildbirthdeliverymethodsinneonatalcareunits
AT parksukyoung analysisofthereferralratesofnewbornhearingscreeningtestaccordingtochildbirthdeliverymethodsinneonatalcareunits