Cargando…
The platelet to lymphocyte ratio is a potential inflammatory marker predicting the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colorectal cancer
BACKGROUND: The effects of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) has been in controversy for a long time. Our study aimed to find an effective inflammatory marker to predict the effects of chemotherapy. METHODS: Seven hundred eight stage II CRC patients in our insti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8268489/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34238262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08521-0 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: The effects of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) has been in controversy for a long time. Our study aimed to find an effective inflammatory marker to predict the effects of chemotherapy. METHODS: Seven hundred eight stage II CRC patients in our institution were included. The subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot (STEPP) analysis was used to determine the optimal inflammatory marker and cut-off value. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance discrepancy between the chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy group. Survival analyses based on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were performed with Kaplan-Meier methods with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression. The restricted mean survival time (RMST) was used to measure treatment effect. RESULTS: The platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) was chosen as the optimal marker with a cut-off value of 130 according to STEPP. In OS analysis, PLR was significantly associated with the effects of chemotherapy (interaction p = 0.027). In the low-PLR subgroup, the chemotherapy patients did not have a longer OS than the non-chemotherapy patients (HR: 0.983, 95% CI: 0.528–1.829). In the high-PLR subgroup, the chemotherapy patients had a significantly longer OS than the non-chemotherapy patients (HR: 0.371, 95% CI: 0.212–0.649). After PSM, PLR was still associated with the effects of chemotherapy. In CSS analysis, PLR was not significantly associated with the effects of chemotherapy (interaction p = 0.116). In the low-PLR subgroup, the chemotherapy patients did not have a longer CSS than the non-chemotherapy patients (HR: 1.016, 95% CI: 0.494–2.087). In the high-PLR subgroup, the chemotherapy patients had a longer CSS than the non-chemotherapy patients (HR: 0.371, 95% CI: 0.212–0.649). After PSM, PLR was not associated with the effects of chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: PLR is an effective marker to predict the effects of chemotherapy in patients with stage II CRC. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08521-0. |
---|