Cargando…

Arguments against the Requirement of a Biological License Application for Human Pancreatic Islets: The Position Statement of the Islets for US Collaborative Presented during the FDA Advisory Committee Meeting

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been regulating human islets for allotransplantation as a biologic drug in the US. Consequently, the requirement of a biological license application (BLA) approval before clinical use of islet transplantation as a standard of care procedure has stalled the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Witkowski, Piotr, Odorico, Jon, Pyda, Jordan, Anteby, Roi, Stratta, Robert J., Schrope, Beth A., Hardy, Mark A., Buse, John, Leventhal, Joseph R., Cui, Wanxing, Hussein, Shakir, Niederhaus, Silke, Gaglia, Jason, Desai, Chirag S., Wijkstrom, Martin, Kandeel, Fouad, Bachul, Piotr J., Becker, Yolanda Tai, Wang, Ling-Jia, Robertson, R. Paul, Olaitan, Oyedolamu K., Kozlowski, Tomasz, Abrams, Peter L., Josephson, Michelle A., Andreoni, Kenneth A., Harland, Robert C., Kandaswamy, Raja, Posselt, Andrew M., Szot, Gregory L., Ricordi, Camillo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8269003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34209541
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132878
_version_ 1783720479195922432
author Witkowski, Piotr
Odorico, Jon
Pyda, Jordan
Anteby, Roi
Stratta, Robert J.
Schrope, Beth A.
Hardy, Mark A.
Buse, John
Leventhal, Joseph R.
Cui, Wanxing
Hussein, Shakir
Niederhaus, Silke
Gaglia, Jason
Desai, Chirag S.
Wijkstrom, Martin
Kandeel, Fouad
Bachul, Piotr J.
Becker, Yolanda Tai
Wang, Ling-Jia
Robertson, R. Paul
Olaitan, Oyedolamu K.
Kozlowski, Tomasz
Abrams, Peter L.
Josephson, Michelle A.
Andreoni, Kenneth A.
Harland, Robert C.
Kandaswamy, Raja
Posselt, Andrew M.
Szot, Gregory L.
Ricordi, Camillo
author_facet Witkowski, Piotr
Odorico, Jon
Pyda, Jordan
Anteby, Roi
Stratta, Robert J.
Schrope, Beth A.
Hardy, Mark A.
Buse, John
Leventhal, Joseph R.
Cui, Wanxing
Hussein, Shakir
Niederhaus, Silke
Gaglia, Jason
Desai, Chirag S.
Wijkstrom, Martin
Kandeel, Fouad
Bachul, Piotr J.
Becker, Yolanda Tai
Wang, Ling-Jia
Robertson, R. Paul
Olaitan, Oyedolamu K.
Kozlowski, Tomasz
Abrams, Peter L.
Josephson, Michelle A.
Andreoni, Kenneth A.
Harland, Robert C.
Kandaswamy, Raja
Posselt, Andrew M.
Szot, Gregory L.
Ricordi, Camillo
author_sort Witkowski, Piotr
collection PubMed
description The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been regulating human islets for allotransplantation as a biologic drug in the US. Consequently, the requirement of a biological license application (BLA) approval before clinical use of islet transplantation as a standard of care procedure has stalled the development of the field for the last 20 years. Herein, we provide our commentary to the multiple FDA’s position papers and guidance for industry arguing that BLA requirement has been inappropriately applied to allogeneic islets, which was delivered to the FDA Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Advisory Committee on 15 April 2021. We provided evidence that BLA requirement and drug related regulations are inadequate in reassuring islet product quality and potency as well as patient safety and clinical outcomes. As leaders in the field of transplantation and endocrinology under the “Islets for US Collaborative” designation, we examined the current regulatory status of islet transplantation in the US and identified several anticipated negative consequences of the BLA approval. In our commentary we also offer an alternative pathway for islet transplantation under the regulatory framework for organ transplantation, which would address deficiencies of in current system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8269003
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82690032021-07-10 Arguments against the Requirement of a Biological License Application for Human Pancreatic Islets: The Position Statement of the Islets for US Collaborative Presented during the FDA Advisory Committee Meeting Witkowski, Piotr Odorico, Jon Pyda, Jordan Anteby, Roi Stratta, Robert J. Schrope, Beth A. Hardy, Mark A. Buse, John Leventhal, Joseph R. Cui, Wanxing Hussein, Shakir Niederhaus, Silke Gaglia, Jason Desai, Chirag S. Wijkstrom, Martin Kandeel, Fouad Bachul, Piotr J. Becker, Yolanda Tai Wang, Ling-Jia Robertson, R. Paul Olaitan, Oyedolamu K. Kozlowski, Tomasz Abrams, Peter L. Josephson, Michelle A. Andreoni, Kenneth A. Harland, Robert C. Kandaswamy, Raja Posselt, Andrew M. Szot, Gregory L. Ricordi, Camillo J Clin Med Commentary The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been regulating human islets for allotransplantation as a biologic drug in the US. Consequently, the requirement of a biological license application (BLA) approval before clinical use of islet transplantation as a standard of care procedure has stalled the development of the field for the last 20 years. Herein, we provide our commentary to the multiple FDA’s position papers and guidance for industry arguing that BLA requirement has been inappropriately applied to allogeneic islets, which was delivered to the FDA Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Advisory Committee on 15 April 2021. We provided evidence that BLA requirement and drug related regulations are inadequate in reassuring islet product quality and potency as well as patient safety and clinical outcomes. As leaders in the field of transplantation and endocrinology under the “Islets for US Collaborative” designation, we examined the current regulatory status of islet transplantation in the US and identified several anticipated negative consequences of the BLA approval. In our commentary we also offer an alternative pathway for islet transplantation under the regulatory framework for organ transplantation, which would address deficiencies of in current system. MDPI 2021-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8269003/ /pubmed/34209541 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132878 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Commentary
Witkowski, Piotr
Odorico, Jon
Pyda, Jordan
Anteby, Roi
Stratta, Robert J.
Schrope, Beth A.
Hardy, Mark A.
Buse, John
Leventhal, Joseph R.
Cui, Wanxing
Hussein, Shakir
Niederhaus, Silke
Gaglia, Jason
Desai, Chirag S.
Wijkstrom, Martin
Kandeel, Fouad
Bachul, Piotr J.
Becker, Yolanda Tai
Wang, Ling-Jia
Robertson, R. Paul
Olaitan, Oyedolamu K.
Kozlowski, Tomasz
Abrams, Peter L.
Josephson, Michelle A.
Andreoni, Kenneth A.
Harland, Robert C.
Kandaswamy, Raja
Posselt, Andrew M.
Szot, Gregory L.
Ricordi, Camillo
Arguments against the Requirement of a Biological License Application for Human Pancreatic Islets: The Position Statement of the Islets for US Collaborative Presented during the FDA Advisory Committee Meeting
title Arguments against the Requirement of a Biological License Application for Human Pancreatic Islets: The Position Statement of the Islets for US Collaborative Presented during the FDA Advisory Committee Meeting
title_full Arguments against the Requirement of a Biological License Application for Human Pancreatic Islets: The Position Statement of the Islets for US Collaborative Presented during the FDA Advisory Committee Meeting
title_fullStr Arguments against the Requirement of a Biological License Application for Human Pancreatic Islets: The Position Statement of the Islets for US Collaborative Presented during the FDA Advisory Committee Meeting
title_full_unstemmed Arguments against the Requirement of a Biological License Application for Human Pancreatic Islets: The Position Statement of the Islets for US Collaborative Presented during the FDA Advisory Committee Meeting
title_short Arguments against the Requirement of a Biological License Application for Human Pancreatic Islets: The Position Statement of the Islets for US Collaborative Presented during the FDA Advisory Committee Meeting
title_sort arguments against the requirement of a biological license application for human pancreatic islets: the position statement of the islets for us collaborative presented during the fda advisory committee meeting
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8269003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34209541
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132878
work_keys_str_mv AT witkowskipiotr argumentsagainsttherequirementofabiologicallicenseapplicationforhumanpancreaticisletsthepositionstatementoftheisletsforuscollaborativepresentedduringthefdaadvisorycommitteemeeting
AT odoricojon argumentsagainsttherequirementofabiologicallicenseapplicationforhumanpancreaticisletsthepositionstatementoftheisletsforuscollaborativepresentedduringthefdaadvisorycommitteemeeting
AT pydajordan argumentsagainsttherequirementofabiologicallicenseapplicationforhumanpancreaticisletsthepositionstatementoftheisletsforuscollaborativepresentedduringthefdaadvisorycommitteemeeting
AT antebyroi argumentsagainsttherequirementofabiologicallicenseapplicationforhumanpancreaticisletsthepositionstatementoftheisletsforuscollaborativepresentedduringthefdaadvisorycommitteemeeting
AT strattarobertj argumentsagainsttherequirementofabiologicallicenseapplicationforhumanpancreaticisletsthepositionstatementoftheisletsforuscollaborativepresentedduringthefdaadvisorycommitteemeeting
AT schropebetha argumentsagainsttherequirementofabiologicallicenseapplicationforhumanpancreaticisletsthepositionstatementoftheisletsforuscollaborativepresentedduringthefdaadvisorycommitteemeeting
AT hardymarka argumentsagainsttherequirementofabiologicallicenseapplicationforhumanpancreaticisletsthepositionstatementoftheisletsforuscollaborativepresentedduringthefdaadvisorycommitteemeeting
AT busejohn argumentsagainsttherequirementofabiologicallicenseapplicationforhumanpancreaticisletsthepositionstatementoftheisletsforuscollaborativepresentedduringthefdaadvisorycommitteemeeting
AT leventhaljosephr argumentsagainsttherequirementofabiologicallicenseapplicationforhumanpancreaticisletsthepositionstatementoftheisletsforuscollaborativepresentedduringthefdaadvisorycommitteemeeting
AT cuiwanxing argumentsagainsttherequirementofabiologicallicenseapplicationforhumanpancreaticisletsthepositionstatementoftheisletsforuscollaborativepresentedduringthefdaadvisorycommitteemeeting
AT husseinshakir argumentsagainsttherequirementofabiologicallicenseapplicationforhumanpancreaticisletsthepositionstatementoftheisletsforuscollaborativepresentedduringthefdaadvisorycommitteemeeting
AT niederhaussilke argumentsagainsttherequirementofabiologicallicenseapplicationforhumanpancreaticisletsthepositionstatementoftheisletsforuscollaborativepresentedduringthefdaadvisorycommitteemeeting
AT gagliajason argumentsagainsttherequirementofabiologicallicenseapplicationforhumanpancreaticisletsthepositionstatementoftheisletsforuscollaborativepresentedduringthefdaadvisorycommitteemeeting
AT desaichirags argumentsagainsttherequirementofabiologicallicenseapplicationforhumanpancreaticisletsthepositionstatementoftheisletsforuscollaborativepresentedduringthefdaadvisorycommitteemeeting
AT wijkstrommartin argumentsagainsttherequirementofabiologicallicenseapplicationforhumanpancreaticisletsthepositionstatementoftheisletsforuscollaborativepresentedduringthefdaadvisorycommitteemeeting
AT kandeelfouad argumentsagainsttherequirementofabiologicallicenseapplicationforhumanpancreaticisletsthepositionstatementoftheisletsforuscollaborativepresentedduringthefdaadvisorycommitteemeeting
AT bachulpiotrj argumentsagainsttherequirementofabiologicallicenseapplicationforhumanpancreaticisletsthepositionstatementoftheisletsforuscollaborativepresentedduringthefdaadvisorycommitteemeeting
AT beckeryolandatai argumentsagainsttherequirementofabiologicallicenseapplicationforhumanpancreaticisletsthepositionstatementoftheisletsforuscollaborativepresentedduringthefdaadvisorycommitteemeeting
AT wanglingjia argumentsagainsttherequirementofabiologicallicenseapplicationforhumanpancreaticisletsthepositionstatementoftheisletsforuscollaborativepresentedduringthefdaadvisorycommitteemeeting
AT robertsonrpaul argumentsagainsttherequirementofabiologicallicenseapplicationforhumanpancreaticisletsthepositionstatementoftheisletsforuscollaborativepresentedduringthefdaadvisorycommitteemeeting
AT olaitanoyedolamuk argumentsagainsttherequirementofabiologicallicenseapplicationforhumanpancreaticisletsthepositionstatementoftheisletsforuscollaborativepresentedduringthefdaadvisorycommitteemeeting
AT kozlowskitomasz argumentsagainsttherequirementofabiologicallicenseapplicationforhumanpancreaticisletsthepositionstatementoftheisletsforuscollaborativepresentedduringthefdaadvisorycommitteemeeting
AT abramspeterl argumentsagainsttherequirementofabiologicallicenseapplicationforhumanpancreaticisletsthepositionstatementoftheisletsforuscollaborativepresentedduringthefdaadvisorycommitteemeeting
AT josephsonmichellea argumentsagainsttherequirementofabiologicallicenseapplicationforhumanpancreaticisletsthepositionstatementoftheisletsforuscollaborativepresentedduringthefdaadvisorycommitteemeeting
AT andreonikennetha argumentsagainsttherequirementofabiologicallicenseapplicationforhumanpancreaticisletsthepositionstatementoftheisletsforuscollaborativepresentedduringthefdaadvisorycommitteemeeting
AT harlandrobertc argumentsagainsttherequirementofabiologicallicenseapplicationforhumanpancreaticisletsthepositionstatementoftheisletsforuscollaborativepresentedduringthefdaadvisorycommitteemeeting
AT kandaswamyraja argumentsagainsttherequirementofabiologicallicenseapplicationforhumanpancreaticisletsthepositionstatementoftheisletsforuscollaborativepresentedduringthefdaadvisorycommitteemeeting
AT posseltandrewm argumentsagainsttherequirementofabiologicallicenseapplicationforhumanpancreaticisletsthepositionstatementoftheisletsforuscollaborativepresentedduringthefdaadvisorycommitteemeeting
AT szotgregoryl argumentsagainsttherequirementofabiologicallicenseapplicationforhumanpancreaticisletsthepositionstatementoftheisletsforuscollaborativepresentedduringthefdaadvisorycommitteemeeting
AT ricordicamillo argumentsagainsttherequirementofabiologicallicenseapplicationforhumanpancreaticisletsthepositionstatementoftheisletsforuscollaborativepresentedduringthefdaadvisorycommitteemeeting
AT argumentsagainsttherequirementofabiologicallicenseapplicationforhumanpancreaticisletsthepositionstatementoftheisletsforuscollaborativepresentedduringthefdaadvisorycommitteemeeting