Cargando…
Prediction of Late-Onset Small for Gestational Age and Fetal Growth Restriction by Fetal Biometry at 35 Weeks and Impact of Ultrasound–Delivery Interval: Comparison of Six Fetal Growth Standards
Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants have been associated with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes (APOs). In this work, we assess the predictive ability of the ultrasound-estimated percentile weight (EPW) at 35 weeks of gestational age to predict late-onset SGA and APOs, according to si...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8269193/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34279466 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132984 |
_version_ | 1783720522831364096 |
---|---|
author | Savirón-Cornudella, Ricardo Esteban, Luis Mariano Aznar-Gimeno, Rocío Dieste-Pérez, Peña Pérez-López, Faustino R. Campillos, Jose Manuel Castán-Larraz, Berta Sanz, Gerardo Tajada-Duaso, Mauricio |
author_facet | Savirón-Cornudella, Ricardo Esteban, Luis Mariano Aznar-Gimeno, Rocío Dieste-Pérez, Peña Pérez-López, Faustino R. Campillos, Jose Manuel Castán-Larraz, Berta Sanz, Gerardo Tajada-Duaso, Mauricio |
author_sort | Savirón-Cornudella, Ricardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants have been associated with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes (APOs). In this work, we assess the predictive ability of the ultrasound-estimated percentile weight (EPW) at 35 weeks of gestational age to predict late-onset SGA and APOs, according to six growth standards, and whether the ultrasound–delivery interval influences the detection rate. To this purpose, we analyze a retrospective cohort study of 9585 singleton pregnancies. EPWs at 35 weeks were calculated to the customized Miguel Servet University Hospital (MSUH) and Figueras standards and the non-customized MSUH, Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF), INTERGROWTH-21st, and WHO standards. As results of our analysis, for a 10% false positive rate, the detection rates for SGA ranged between 48.9% with the customized Figueras standard (AUC 0.82) and 60.8% with the non-customized FMF standard (AUC 0.87). Detection rates to predict SGA by ultrasound–delivery interval (1–6 weeks) show higher detection rates as intervals decrease. APOs detection rates ranged from 27.0% with FMF to 7.9% with the Figueras standard. In conclusion, the ability of EPW to predict SGA at 35 weeks is good for all standards, and slightly better for non-customized standards. The APO detection rate is significantly greater for non-customized standards. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8269193 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82691932021-07-10 Prediction of Late-Onset Small for Gestational Age and Fetal Growth Restriction by Fetal Biometry at 35 Weeks and Impact of Ultrasound–Delivery Interval: Comparison of Six Fetal Growth Standards Savirón-Cornudella, Ricardo Esteban, Luis Mariano Aznar-Gimeno, Rocío Dieste-Pérez, Peña Pérez-López, Faustino R. Campillos, Jose Manuel Castán-Larraz, Berta Sanz, Gerardo Tajada-Duaso, Mauricio J Clin Med Article Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants have been associated with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes (APOs). In this work, we assess the predictive ability of the ultrasound-estimated percentile weight (EPW) at 35 weeks of gestational age to predict late-onset SGA and APOs, according to six growth standards, and whether the ultrasound–delivery interval influences the detection rate. To this purpose, we analyze a retrospective cohort study of 9585 singleton pregnancies. EPWs at 35 weeks were calculated to the customized Miguel Servet University Hospital (MSUH) and Figueras standards and the non-customized MSUH, Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF), INTERGROWTH-21st, and WHO standards. As results of our analysis, for a 10% false positive rate, the detection rates for SGA ranged between 48.9% with the customized Figueras standard (AUC 0.82) and 60.8% with the non-customized FMF standard (AUC 0.87). Detection rates to predict SGA by ultrasound–delivery interval (1–6 weeks) show higher detection rates as intervals decrease. APOs detection rates ranged from 27.0% with FMF to 7.9% with the Figueras standard. In conclusion, the ability of EPW to predict SGA at 35 weeks is good for all standards, and slightly better for non-customized standards. The APO detection rate is significantly greater for non-customized standards. MDPI 2021-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8269193/ /pubmed/34279466 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132984 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Savirón-Cornudella, Ricardo Esteban, Luis Mariano Aznar-Gimeno, Rocío Dieste-Pérez, Peña Pérez-López, Faustino R. Campillos, Jose Manuel Castán-Larraz, Berta Sanz, Gerardo Tajada-Duaso, Mauricio Prediction of Late-Onset Small for Gestational Age and Fetal Growth Restriction by Fetal Biometry at 35 Weeks and Impact of Ultrasound–Delivery Interval: Comparison of Six Fetal Growth Standards |
title | Prediction of Late-Onset Small for Gestational Age and Fetal Growth Restriction by Fetal Biometry at 35 Weeks and Impact of Ultrasound–Delivery Interval: Comparison of Six Fetal Growth Standards |
title_full | Prediction of Late-Onset Small for Gestational Age and Fetal Growth Restriction by Fetal Biometry at 35 Weeks and Impact of Ultrasound–Delivery Interval: Comparison of Six Fetal Growth Standards |
title_fullStr | Prediction of Late-Onset Small for Gestational Age and Fetal Growth Restriction by Fetal Biometry at 35 Weeks and Impact of Ultrasound–Delivery Interval: Comparison of Six Fetal Growth Standards |
title_full_unstemmed | Prediction of Late-Onset Small for Gestational Age and Fetal Growth Restriction by Fetal Biometry at 35 Weeks and Impact of Ultrasound–Delivery Interval: Comparison of Six Fetal Growth Standards |
title_short | Prediction of Late-Onset Small for Gestational Age and Fetal Growth Restriction by Fetal Biometry at 35 Weeks and Impact of Ultrasound–Delivery Interval: Comparison of Six Fetal Growth Standards |
title_sort | prediction of late-onset small for gestational age and fetal growth restriction by fetal biometry at 35 weeks and impact of ultrasound–delivery interval: comparison of six fetal growth standards |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8269193/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34279466 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132984 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT savironcornudellaricardo predictionoflateonsetsmallforgestationalageandfetalgrowthrestrictionbyfetalbiometryat35weeksandimpactofultrasounddeliveryintervalcomparisonofsixfetalgrowthstandards AT estebanluismariano predictionoflateonsetsmallforgestationalageandfetalgrowthrestrictionbyfetalbiometryat35weeksandimpactofultrasounddeliveryintervalcomparisonofsixfetalgrowthstandards AT aznargimenorocio predictionoflateonsetsmallforgestationalageandfetalgrowthrestrictionbyfetalbiometryat35weeksandimpactofultrasounddeliveryintervalcomparisonofsixfetalgrowthstandards AT diesteperezpena predictionoflateonsetsmallforgestationalageandfetalgrowthrestrictionbyfetalbiometryat35weeksandimpactofultrasounddeliveryintervalcomparisonofsixfetalgrowthstandards AT perezlopezfaustinor predictionoflateonsetsmallforgestationalageandfetalgrowthrestrictionbyfetalbiometryat35weeksandimpactofultrasounddeliveryintervalcomparisonofsixfetalgrowthstandards AT campillosjosemanuel predictionoflateonsetsmallforgestationalageandfetalgrowthrestrictionbyfetalbiometryat35weeksandimpactofultrasounddeliveryintervalcomparisonofsixfetalgrowthstandards AT castanlarrazberta predictionoflateonsetsmallforgestationalageandfetalgrowthrestrictionbyfetalbiometryat35weeksandimpactofultrasounddeliveryintervalcomparisonofsixfetalgrowthstandards AT sanzgerardo predictionoflateonsetsmallforgestationalageandfetalgrowthrestrictionbyfetalbiometryat35weeksandimpactofultrasounddeliveryintervalcomparisonofsixfetalgrowthstandards AT tajadaduasomauricio predictionoflateonsetsmallforgestationalageandfetalgrowthrestrictionbyfetalbiometryat35weeksandimpactofultrasounddeliveryintervalcomparisonofsixfetalgrowthstandards |