Cargando…

Prediction of Late-Onset Small for Gestational Age and Fetal Growth Restriction by Fetal Biometry at 35 Weeks and Impact of Ultrasound–Delivery Interval: Comparison of Six Fetal Growth Standards

Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants have been associated with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes (APOs). In this work, we assess the predictive ability of the ultrasound-estimated percentile weight (EPW) at 35 weeks of gestational age to predict late-onset SGA and APOs, according to si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Savirón-Cornudella, Ricardo, Esteban, Luis Mariano, Aznar-Gimeno, Rocío, Dieste-Pérez, Peña, Pérez-López, Faustino R., Campillos, Jose Manuel, Castán-Larraz, Berta, Sanz, Gerardo, Tajada-Duaso, Mauricio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8269193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34279466
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132984
_version_ 1783720522831364096
author Savirón-Cornudella, Ricardo
Esteban, Luis Mariano
Aznar-Gimeno, Rocío
Dieste-Pérez, Peña
Pérez-López, Faustino R.
Campillos, Jose Manuel
Castán-Larraz, Berta
Sanz, Gerardo
Tajada-Duaso, Mauricio
author_facet Savirón-Cornudella, Ricardo
Esteban, Luis Mariano
Aznar-Gimeno, Rocío
Dieste-Pérez, Peña
Pérez-López, Faustino R.
Campillos, Jose Manuel
Castán-Larraz, Berta
Sanz, Gerardo
Tajada-Duaso, Mauricio
author_sort Savirón-Cornudella, Ricardo
collection PubMed
description Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants have been associated with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes (APOs). In this work, we assess the predictive ability of the ultrasound-estimated percentile weight (EPW) at 35 weeks of gestational age to predict late-onset SGA and APOs, according to six growth standards, and whether the ultrasound–delivery interval influences the detection rate. To this purpose, we analyze a retrospective cohort study of 9585 singleton pregnancies. EPWs at 35 weeks were calculated to the customized Miguel Servet University Hospital (MSUH) and Figueras standards and the non-customized MSUH, Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF), INTERGROWTH-21st, and WHO standards. As results of our analysis, for a 10% false positive rate, the detection rates for SGA ranged between 48.9% with the customized Figueras standard (AUC 0.82) and 60.8% with the non-customized FMF standard (AUC 0.87). Detection rates to predict SGA by ultrasound–delivery interval (1–6 weeks) show higher detection rates as intervals decrease. APOs detection rates ranged from 27.0% with FMF to 7.9% with the Figueras standard. In conclusion, the ability of EPW to predict SGA at 35 weeks is good for all standards, and slightly better for non-customized standards. The APO detection rate is significantly greater for non-customized standards.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8269193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82691932021-07-10 Prediction of Late-Onset Small for Gestational Age and Fetal Growth Restriction by Fetal Biometry at 35 Weeks and Impact of Ultrasound–Delivery Interval: Comparison of Six Fetal Growth Standards Savirón-Cornudella, Ricardo Esteban, Luis Mariano Aznar-Gimeno, Rocío Dieste-Pérez, Peña Pérez-López, Faustino R. Campillos, Jose Manuel Castán-Larraz, Berta Sanz, Gerardo Tajada-Duaso, Mauricio J Clin Med Article Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants have been associated with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes (APOs). In this work, we assess the predictive ability of the ultrasound-estimated percentile weight (EPW) at 35 weeks of gestational age to predict late-onset SGA and APOs, according to six growth standards, and whether the ultrasound–delivery interval influences the detection rate. To this purpose, we analyze a retrospective cohort study of 9585 singleton pregnancies. EPWs at 35 weeks were calculated to the customized Miguel Servet University Hospital (MSUH) and Figueras standards and the non-customized MSUH, Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF), INTERGROWTH-21st, and WHO standards. As results of our analysis, for a 10% false positive rate, the detection rates for SGA ranged between 48.9% with the customized Figueras standard (AUC 0.82) and 60.8% with the non-customized FMF standard (AUC 0.87). Detection rates to predict SGA by ultrasound–delivery interval (1–6 weeks) show higher detection rates as intervals decrease. APOs detection rates ranged from 27.0% with FMF to 7.9% with the Figueras standard. In conclusion, the ability of EPW to predict SGA at 35 weeks is good for all standards, and slightly better for non-customized standards. The APO detection rate is significantly greater for non-customized standards. MDPI 2021-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8269193/ /pubmed/34279466 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132984 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Savirón-Cornudella, Ricardo
Esteban, Luis Mariano
Aznar-Gimeno, Rocío
Dieste-Pérez, Peña
Pérez-López, Faustino R.
Campillos, Jose Manuel
Castán-Larraz, Berta
Sanz, Gerardo
Tajada-Duaso, Mauricio
Prediction of Late-Onset Small for Gestational Age and Fetal Growth Restriction by Fetal Biometry at 35 Weeks and Impact of Ultrasound–Delivery Interval: Comparison of Six Fetal Growth Standards
title Prediction of Late-Onset Small for Gestational Age and Fetal Growth Restriction by Fetal Biometry at 35 Weeks and Impact of Ultrasound–Delivery Interval: Comparison of Six Fetal Growth Standards
title_full Prediction of Late-Onset Small for Gestational Age and Fetal Growth Restriction by Fetal Biometry at 35 Weeks and Impact of Ultrasound–Delivery Interval: Comparison of Six Fetal Growth Standards
title_fullStr Prediction of Late-Onset Small for Gestational Age and Fetal Growth Restriction by Fetal Biometry at 35 Weeks and Impact of Ultrasound–Delivery Interval: Comparison of Six Fetal Growth Standards
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of Late-Onset Small for Gestational Age and Fetal Growth Restriction by Fetal Biometry at 35 Weeks and Impact of Ultrasound–Delivery Interval: Comparison of Six Fetal Growth Standards
title_short Prediction of Late-Onset Small for Gestational Age and Fetal Growth Restriction by Fetal Biometry at 35 Weeks and Impact of Ultrasound–Delivery Interval: Comparison of Six Fetal Growth Standards
title_sort prediction of late-onset small for gestational age and fetal growth restriction by fetal biometry at 35 weeks and impact of ultrasound–delivery interval: comparison of six fetal growth standards
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8269193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34279466
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132984
work_keys_str_mv AT savironcornudellaricardo predictionoflateonsetsmallforgestationalageandfetalgrowthrestrictionbyfetalbiometryat35weeksandimpactofultrasounddeliveryintervalcomparisonofsixfetalgrowthstandards
AT estebanluismariano predictionoflateonsetsmallforgestationalageandfetalgrowthrestrictionbyfetalbiometryat35weeksandimpactofultrasounddeliveryintervalcomparisonofsixfetalgrowthstandards
AT aznargimenorocio predictionoflateonsetsmallforgestationalageandfetalgrowthrestrictionbyfetalbiometryat35weeksandimpactofultrasounddeliveryintervalcomparisonofsixfetalgrowthstandards
AT diesteperezpena predictionoflateonsetsmallforgestationalageandfetalgrowthrestrictionbyfetalbiometryat35weeksandimpactofultrasounddeliveryintervalcomparisonofsixfetalgrowthstandards
AT perezlopezfaustinor predictionoflateonsetsmallforgestationalageandfetalgrowthrestrictionbyfetalbiometryat35weeksandimpactofultrasounddeliveryintervalcomparisonofsixfetalgrowthstandards
AT campillosjosemanuel predictionoflateonsetsmallforgestationalageandfetalgrowthrestrictionbyfetalbiometryat35weeksandimpactofultrasounddeliveryintervalcomparisonofsixfetalgrowthstandards
AT castanlarrazberta predictionoflateonsetsmallforgestationalageandfetalgrowthrestrictionbyfetalbiometryat35weeksandimpactofultrasounddeliveryintervalcomparisonofsixfetalgrowthstandards
AT sanzgerardo predictionoflateonsetsmallforgestationalageandfetalgrowthrestrictionbyfetalbiometryat35weeksandimpactofultrasounddeliveryintervalcomparisonofsixfetalgrowthstandards
AT tajadaduasomauricio predictionoflateonsetsmallforgestationalageandfetalgrowthrestrictionbyfetalbiometryat35weeksandimpactofultrasounddeliveryintervalcomparisonofsixfetalgrowthstandards