Cargando…

Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Compared to a Combination of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine with Ketamine for Sedation of Children Requiring Dental Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Outpatient pediatric sedation is challenging. This study aimed to test intranasal dexmedetomidine efficacy as a single drug or combined with ketamine (DK) to sedate children undergoing dental treatment. Children < 7 years were randomized into dexmedetomidine 2 mcg/kg and ketamine 1 mg/kg (DK) or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sado-Filho, Joji, Corrêa-Faria, Patrícia, Viana, Karolline A., Mendes, Fausto M., Mason, Keira P., Costa, Luciane R., Costa, Paulo S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8269392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34199001
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132840
_version_ 1783720569274892288
author Sado-Filho, Joji
Corrêa-Faria, Patrícia
Viana, Karolline A.
Mendes, Fausto M.
Mason, Keira P.
Costa, Luciane R.
Costa, Paulo S.
author_facet Sado-Filho, Joji
Corrêa-Faria, Patrícia
Viana, Karolline A.
Mendes, Fausto M.
Mason, Keira P.
Costa, Luciane R.
Costa, Paulo S.
author_sort Sado-Filho, Joji
collection PubMed
description Outpatient pediatric sedation is challenging. This study aimed to test intranasal dexmedetomidine efficacy as a single drug or combined with ketamine (DK) to sedate children undergoing dental treatment. Children < 7 years were randomized into dexmedetomidine 2 mcg/kg and ketamine 1 mg/kg (DK) or dexmedetomidine 2.5 mcg/kg (D) groups. Videos from the dental sedation allowed the systematic assessment of children’s behavior (primary outcome) according to the Ohio State University Behavioral Rating Scale (OSUBRS). Secondary outcomes were parental and dentist satisfaction, adverse events, and recovery time. The data were analyzed descriptively and through regression models. Participants were 88 children (44 per group; 50 boys). The duration of quiet behavior (OSUBRS) was higher than 50% (DK mean 58.4 [standard deviation 38.1]; D 55.2 [39.1]; p = 0.225). Parents (DK 78.0 [32.2]; D 72.7 [35.1]; p = 0.203) and dentists (KD 62.7 [41.0]; D 62.8 [40.1]; p = 0.339) were overall satisfied. Adverse events occurred in 16 cases (DK n = 10, 62.5%; D n= 6, 37.5%; p = 0.104) and were minor. The median recovery time in the DK group was 1.3 times greater than in group D (p < 0.05). Intranasal sedation with dexmedetomidine alone is equally efficacious and satisfactory for pediatric sedation with fewer adverse events and faster recovery than the DK combination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8269392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82693922021-07-10 Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Compared to a Combination of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine with Ketamine for Sedation of Children Requiring Dental Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial Sado-Filho, Joji Corrêa-Faria, Patrícia Viana, Karolline A. Mendes, Fausto M. Mason, Keira P. Costa, Luciane R. Costa, Paulo S. J Clin Med Article Outpatient pediatric sedation is challenging. This study aimed to test intranasal dexmedetomidine efficacy as a single drug or combined with ketamine (DK) to sedate children undergoing dental treatment. Children < 7 years were randomized into dexmedetomidine 2 mcg/kg and ketamine 1 mg/kg (DK) or dexmedetomidine 2.5 mcg/kg (D) groups. Videos from the dental sedation allowed the systematic assessment of children’s behavior (primary outcome) according to the Ohio State University Behavioral Rating Scale (OSUBRS). Secondary outcomes were parental and dentist satisfaction, adverse events, and recovery time. The data were analyzed descriptively and through regression models. Participants were 88 children (44 per group; 50 boys). The duration of quiet behavior (OSUBRS) was higher than 50% (DK mean 58.4 [standard deviation 38.1]; D 55.2 [39.1]; p = 0.225). Parents (DK 78.0 [32.2]; D 72.7 [35.1]; p = 0.203) and dentists (KD 62.7 [41.0]; D 62.8 [40.1]; p = 0.339) were overall satisfied. Adverse events occurred in 16 cases (DK n = 10, 62.5%; D n= 6, 37.5%; p = 0.104) and were minor. The median recovery time in the DK group was 1.3 times greater than in group D (p < 0.05). Intranasal sedation with dexmedetomidine alone is equally efficacious and satisfactory for pediatric sedation with fewer adverse events and faster recovery than the DK combination. MDPI 2021-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8269392/ /pubmed/34199001 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132840 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sado-Filho, Joji
Corrêa-Faria, Patrícia
Viana, Karolline A.
Mendes, Fausto M.
Mason, Keira P.
Costa, Luciane R.
Costa, Paulo S.
Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Compared to a Combination of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine with Ketamine for Sedation of Children Requiring Dental Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Compared to a Combination of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine with Ketamine for Sedation of Children Requiring Dental Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Compared to a Combination of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine with Ketamine for Sedation of Children Requiring Dental Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Compared to a Combination of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine with Ketamine for Sedation of Children Requiring Dental Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Compared to a Combination of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine with Ketamine for Sedation of Children Requiring Dental Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Compared to a Combination of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine with Ketamine for Sedation of Children Requiring Dental Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort intranasal dexmedetomidine compared to a combination of intranasal dexmedetomidine with ketamine for sedation of children requiring dental treatment: a randomized clinical trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8269392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34199001
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132840
work_keys_str_mv AT sadofilhojoji intranasaldexmedetomidinecomparedtoacombinationofintranasaldexmedetomidinewithketamineforsedationofchildrenrequiringdentaltreatmentarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT correafariapatricia intranasaldexmedetomidinecomparedtoacombinationofintranasaldexmedetomidinewithketamineforsedationofchildrenrequiringdentaltreatmentarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT vianakarollinea intranasaldexmedetomidinecomparedtoacombinationofintranasaldexmedetomidinewithketamineforsedationofchildrenrequiringdentaltreatmentarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT mendesfaustom intranasaldexmedetomidinecomparedtoacombinationofintranasaldexmedetomidinewithketamineforsedationofchildrenrequiringdentaltreatmentarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT masonkeirap intranasaldexmedetomidinecomparedtoacombinationofintranasaldexmedetomidinewithketamineforsedationofchildrenrequiringdentaltreatmentarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT costalucianer intranasaldexmedetomidinecomparedtoacombinationofintranasaldexmedetomidinewithketamineforsedationofchildrenrequiringdentaltreatmentarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT costapaulos intranasaldexmedetomidinecomparedtoacombinationofintranasaldexmedetomidinewithketamineforsedationofchildrenrequiringdentaltreatmentarandomizedclinicaltrial