Cargando…

Bather Shedding as a Source of Human Fecal Markers to a Recreational Beach

Microbial source tracking (MST) can identify and locate surf zone fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) sources. However, DNA-based fecal marker results may raise new questions, since FIB and DNA marker sources can differ. Here, during 2 years of summertime (dry season) MST for a Goleta, California recreat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Dong, Van De Werfhorst, Laurie C., Steets, Brandon, Ervin, Jared, Murray, Jill L. S., Devarajan, Naresh, Holden, Patricia A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8269448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34248883
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.673190
_version_ 1783720581896601600
author Li, Dong
Van De Werfhorst, Laurie C.
Steets, Brandon
Ervin, Jared
Murray, Jill L. S.
Devarajan, Naresh
Holden, Patricia A.
author_facet Li, Dong
Van De Werfhorst, Laurie C.
Steets, Brandon
Ervin, Jared
Murray, Jill L. S.
Devarajan, Naresh
Holden, Patricia A.
author_sort Li, Dong
collection PubMed
description Microbial source tracking (MST) can identify and locate surf zone fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) sources. However, DNA-based fecal marker results may raise new questions, since FIB and DNA marker sources can differ. Here, during 2 years of summertime (dry season) MST for a Goleta, California recreational beach, surf zone FIB were mainly from gulls, yet low level human-associated DNA-based fecal marker (HF183) was detected in 25 and 14% of surf zone water samples, respectively. Watershed sources were hypothesized because dry weather creek waters had elevated FIB, and runoff-generating rain events mobilized human (and dog) fecal markers and Salmonella spp. into creeks, with human marker HF183 detected in 40 and 50% of creek water samples, dog markers detected in 70 and 50% of samples, and Salmonella spp. in 40 and 33.3% of samples, respectively over 2 years. However, the dry weather estuary outlet was bermed in the first study year; simultaneously, creek fecal markers and pathogens were lower or similar to surf zone results. Although the berm breached in the second year, surf zone fecal markers stayed low. Watershed sediments, intertidal beach sands, and nearshore sediments were devoid of HF183 and dog-associated DNA markers. Based on dye tests and groundwater sampling, beach sanitary sewers were not leaking; groundwater was also devoid of HF183. Offshore sources appeared unlikely, since FIB and fecal markers decreased along a spatial gradient from the surf zone toward nearshore and offshore ocean waters. Further, like other regional beaches, surf zone HF183 corresponded significantly to bather counts, especially in the afternoons when there were more swimmers. However, morning detections of surf zone HF183 when there were few swimmers raised the possibility that the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) offshore outfall discharged HF183 overnight which transported to the surf zone. These findings support that there may be lowest achievable limits of surf zone HF183 owing to several chronic and permanent, perhaps diurnal, low concentration sources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8269448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82694482021-07-10 Bather Shedding as a Source of Human Fecal Markers to a Recreational Beach Li, Dong Van De Werfhorst, Laurie C. Steets, Brandon Ervin, Jared Murray, Jill L. S. Devarajan, Naresh Holden, Patricia A. Front Microbiol Microbiology Microbial source tracking (MST) can identify and locate surf zone fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) sources. However, DNA-based fecal marker results may raise new questions, since FIB and DNA marker sources can differ. Here, during 2 years of summertime (dry season) MST for a Goleta, California recreational beach, surf zone FIB were mainly from gulls, yet low level human-associated DNA-based fecal marker (HF183) was detected in 25 and 14% of surf zone water samples, respectively. Watershed sources were hypothesized because dry weather creek waters had elevated FIB, and runoff-generating rain events mobilized human (and dog) fecal markers and Salmonella spp. into creeks, with human marker HF183 detected in 40 and 50% of creek water samples, dog markers detected in 70 and 50% of samples, and Salmonella spp. in 40 and 33.3% of samples, respectively over 2 years. However, the dry weather estuary outlet was bermed in the first study year; simultaneously, creek fecal markers and pathogens were lower or similar to surf zone results. Although the berm breached in the second year, surf zone fecal markers stayed low. Watershed sediments, intertidal beach sands, and nearshore sediments were devoid of HF183 and dog-associated DNA markers. Based on dye tests and groundwater sampling, beach sanitary sewers were not leaking; groundwater was also devoid of HF183. Offshore sources appeared unlikely, since FIB and fecal markers decreased along a spatial gradient from the surf zone toward nearshore and offshore ocean waters. Further, like other regional beaches, surf zone HF183 corresponded significantly to bather counts, especially in the afternoons when there were more swimmers. However, morning detections of surf zone HF183 when there were few swimmers raised the possibility that the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) offshore outfall discharged HF183 overnight which transported to the surf zone. These findings support that there may be lowest achievable limits of surf zone HF183 owing to several chronic and permanent, perhaps diurnal, low concentration sources. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8269448/ /pubmed/34248883 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.673190 Text en Copyright © 2021 Li, Van De Werfhorst, Steets, Ervin, Murray, Devarajan and Holden. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Li, Dong
Van De Werfhorst, Laurie C.
Steets, Brandon
Ervin, Jared
Murray, Jill L. S.
Devarajan, Naresh
Holden, Patricia A.
Bather Shedding as a Source of Human Fecal Markers to a Recreational Beach
title Bather Shedding as a Source of Human Fecal Markers to a Recreational Beach
title_full Bather Shedding as a Source of Human Fecal Markers to a Recreational Beach
title_fullStr Bather Shedding as a Source of Human Fecal Markers to a Recreational Beach
title_full_unstemmed Bather Shedding as a Source of Human Fecal Markers to a Recreational Beach
title_short Bather Shedding as a Source of Human Fecal Markers to a Recreational Beach
title_sort bather shedding as a source of human fecal markers to a recreational beach
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8269448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34248883
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.673190
work_keys_str_mv AT lidong bathersheddingasasourceofhumanfecalmarkerstoarecreationalbeach
AT vandewerfhorstlauriec bathersheddingasasourceofhumanfecalmarkerstoarecreationalbeach
AT steetsbrandon bathersheddingasasourceofhumanfecalmarkerstoarecreationalbeach
AT ervinjared bathersheddingasasourceofhumanfecalmarkerstoarecreationalbeach
AT murrayjillls bathersheddingasasourceofhumanfecalmarkerstoarecreationalbeach
AT devarajannaresh bathersheddingasasourceofhumanfecalmarkerstoarecreationalbeach
AT holdenpatriciaa bathersheddingasasourceofhumanfecalmarkerstoarecreationalbeach