Cargando…
Evaluating the Homogeneity of Surface Features Induced by Impact-Based Surface Treatments
Impact surface treatments are well-known for their efficiency in enhancing the mechanical properties of metallic materials, especially under cyclic loadings. These processes, which encompass a wide range of surface treatments based on repetitive impacts of tools of various types, induce surface plas...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8269480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34206556 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14133476 |
_version_ | 1783720589527089152 |
---|---|
author | Heydari Astaraee, Asghar Bagherifard, Sara Monti, Stefano Guagliano, Mario |
author_facet | Heydari Astaraee, Asghar Bagherifard, Sara Monti, Stefano Guagliano, Mario |
author_sort | Heydari Astaraee, Asghar |
collection | PubMed |
description | Impact surface treatments are well-known for their efficiency in enhancing the mechanical properties of metallic materials, especially under cyclic loadings. These processes, which encompass a wide range of surface treatments based on repetitive impacts of tools of various types, induce surface plastic deformation, compressive residual stresses, and grain refinement alter the surface roughness as a side effect. Thus, it is essential to have suitable indexes to quantify the surface features caused by the typically random nature of these treatments. Herein, we evaluated the rationality of using standard roughness parameters for describing the morphological characteristics of surfaces treated by shot peening as a representative and widely used treatment of the category. A detailed numerical model of the peening process was developed. The output data were elaborated to extract the surface roughness parameters following the standard procedures. The results revealed the validity of the surface roughness parameters to describe the topography of material treated with adequate surface coverage, also highlighting the necessity to use a set of parameters rather than the common practice of relying on single parameters. Not considering a comprehensive set of amplitude and spacing parameters can result in significant, inconsistent, and misleading results while comparing the performance of surfaces. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8269480 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82694802021-07-10 Evaluating the Homogeneity of Surface Features Induced by Impact-Based Surface Treatments Heydari Astaraee, Asghar Bagherifard, Sara Monti, Stefano Guagliano, Mario Materials (Basel) Article Impact surface treatments are well-known for their efficiency in enhancing the mechanical properties of metallic materials, especially under cyclic loadings. These processes, which encompass a wide range of surface treatments based on repetitive impacts of tools of various types, induce surface plastic deformation, compressive residual stresses, and grain refinement alter the surface roughness as a side effect. Thus, it is essential to have suitable indexes to quantify the surface features caused by the typically random nature of these treatments. Herein, we evaluated the rationality of using standard roughness parameters for describing the morphological characteristics of surfaces treated by shot peening as a representative and widely used treatment of the category. A detailed numerical model of the peening process was developed. The output data were elaborated to extract the surface roughness parameters following the standard procedures. The results revealed the validity of the surface roughness parameters to describe the topography of material treated with adequate surface coverage, also highlighting the necessity to use a set of parameters rather than the common practice of relying on single parameters. Not considering a comprehensive set of amplitude and spacing parameters can result in significant, inconsistent, and misleading results while comparing the performance of surfaces. MDPI 2021-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8269480/ /pubmed/34206556 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14133476 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Heydari Astaraee, Asghar Bagherifard, Sara Monti, Stefano Guagliano, Mario Evaluating the Homogeneity of Surface Features Induced by Impact-Based Surface Treatments |
title | Evaluating the Homogeneity of Surface Features Induced by Impact-Based Surface Treatments |
title_full | Evaluating the Homogeneity of Surface Features Induced by Impact-Based Surface Treatments |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the Homogeneity of Surface Features Induced by Impact-Based Surface Treatments |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the Homogeneity of Surface Features Induced by Impact-Based Surface Treatments |
title_short | Evaluating the Homogeneity of Surface Features Induced by Impact-Based Surface Treatments |
title_sort | evaluating the homogeneity of surface features induced by impact-based surface treatments |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8269480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34206556 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14133476 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heydariastaraeeasghar evaluatingthehomogeneityofsurfacefeaturesinducedbyimpactbasedsurfacetreatments AT bagherifardsara evaluatingthehomogeneityofsurfacefeaturesinducedbyimpactbasedsurfacetreatments AT montistefano evaluatingthehomogeneityofsurfacefeaturesinducedbyimpactbasedsurfacetreatments AT guaglianomario evaluatingthehomogeneityofsurfacefeaturesinducedbyimpactbasedsurfacetreatments |