Cargando…

Qualitative Comparison of 2D and 3D Atmospheric Corrosion Detection Methods

In this article, we report the use of a Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope (CLSM) to apply a qualitative assessment of atmospheric corrosion on steel samples. From the CLSM, we obtain high-resolution images, together with a 3D heightmap. The performance of four different segmentation algorithms that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Kerf, Thomas, Hasheminejad, Navid, Blom, Johan, Vanlanduit, Steve
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8269634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34209551
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14133621
_version_ 1783720626757828608
author De Kerf, Thomas
Hasheminejad, Navid
Blom, Johan
Vanlanduit, Steve
author_facet De Kerf, Thomas
Hasheminejad, Navid
Blom, Johan
Vanlanduit, Steve
author_sort De Kerf, Thomas
collection PubMed
description In this article, we report the use of a Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope (CLSM) to apply a qualitative assessment of atmospheric corrosion on steel samples. From the CLSM, we obtain high-resolution images, together with a 3D heightmap. The performance of four different segmentation algorithms that use the high-resolution images as input is qualitatively assessed and discussed. A novel 3D segmentation algorithm based on the shape index is presented and compared to the 2D segmentation algorithms. From this analysis, we conclude that there is a significant difference in performance between the 2D segmentation algorithms and that the 3D method can be an added value to the detection of corrosion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8269634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82696342021-07-10 Qualitative Comparison of 2D and 3D Atmospheric Corrosion Detection Methods De Kerf, Thomas Hasheminejad, Navid Blom, Johan Vanlanduit, Steve Materials (Basel) Article In this article, we report the use of a Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope (CLSM) to apply a qualitative assessment of atmospheric corrosion on steel samples. From the CLSM, we obtain high-resolution images, together with a 3D heightmap. The performance of four different segmentation algorithms that use the high-resolution images as input is qualitatively assessed and discussed. A novel 3D segmentation algorithm based on the shape index is presented and compared to the 2D segmentation algorithms. From this analysis, we conclude that there is a significant difference in performance between the 2D segmentation algorithms and that the 3D method can be an added value to the detection of corrosion. MDPI 2021-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8269634/ /pubmed/34209551 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14133621 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
De Kerf, Thomas
Hasheminejad, Navid
Blom, Johan
Vanlanduit, Steve
Qualitative Comparison of 2D and 3D Atmospheric Corrosion Detection Methods
title Qualitative Comparison of 2D and 3D Atmospheric Corrosion Detection Methods
title_full Qualitative Comparison of 2D and 3D Atmospheric Corrosion Detection Methods
title_fullStr Qualitative Comparison of 2D and 3D Atmospheric Corrosion Detection Methods
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative Comparison of 2D and 3D Atmospheric Corrosion Detection Methods
title_short Qualitative Comparison of 2D and 3D Atmospheric Corrosion Detection Methods
title_sort qualitative comparison of 2d and 3d atmospheric corrosion detection methods
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8269634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34209551
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14133621
work_keys_str_mv AT dekerfthomas qualitativecomparisonof2dand3datmosphericcorrosiondetectionmethods
AT hasheminejadnavid qualitativecomparisonof2dand3datmosphericcorrosiondetectionmethods
AT blomjohan qualitativecomparisonof2dand3datmosphericcorrosiondetectionmethods
AT vanlanduitsteve qualitativecomparisonof2dand3datmosphericcorrosiondetectionmethods