Cargando…
Qualitative Comparison of 2D and 3D Atmospheric Corrosion Detection Methods
In this article, we report the use of a Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope (CLSM) to apply a qualitative assessment of atmospheric corrosion on steel samples. From the CLSM, we obtain high-resolution images, together with a 3D heightmap. The performance of four different segmentation algorithms that...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8269634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34209551 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14133621 |
_version_ | 1783720626757828608 |
---|---|
author | De Kerf, Thomas Hasheminejad, Navid Blom, Johan Vanlanduit, Steve |
author_facet | De Kerf, Thomas Hasheminejad, Navid Blom, Johan Vanlanduit, Steve |
author_sort | De Kerf, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this article, we report the use of a Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope (CLSM) to apply a qualitative assessment of atmospheric corrosion on steel samples. From the CLSM, we obtain high-resolution images, together with a 3D heightmap. The performance of four different segmentation algorithms that use the high-resolution images as input is qualitatively assessed and discussed. A novel 3D segmentation algorithm based on the shape index is presented and compared to the 2D segmentation algorithms. From this analysis, we conclude that there is a significant difference in performance between the 2D segmentation algorithms and that the 3D method can be an added value to the detection of corrosion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8269634 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82696342021-07-10 Qualitative Comparison of 2D and 3D Atmospheric Corrosion Detection Methods De Kerf, Thomas Hasheminejad, Navid Blom, Johan Vanlanduit, Steve Materials (Basel) Article In this article, we report the use of a Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope (CLSM) to apply a qualitative assessment of atmospheric corrosion on steel samples. From the CLSM, we obtain high-resolution images, together with a 3D heightmap. The performance of four different segmentation algorithms that use the high-resolution images as input is qualitatively assessed and discussed. A novel 3D segmentation algorithm based on the shape index is presented and compared to the 2D segmentation algorithms. From this analysis, we conclude that there is a significant difference in performance between the 2D segmentation algorithms and that the 3D method can be an added value to the detection of corrosion. MDPI 2021-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8269634/ /pubmed/34209551 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14133621 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article De Kerf, Thomas Hasheminejad, Navid Blom, Johan Vanlanduit, Steve Qualitative Comparison of 2D and 3D Atmospheric Corrosion Detection Methods |
title | Qualitative Comparison of 2D and 3D Atmospheric Corrosion Detection Methods |
title_full | Qualitative Comparison of 2D and 3D Atmospheric Corrosion Detection Methods |
title_fullStr | Qualitative Comparison of 2D and 3D Atmospheric Corrosion Detection Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Qualitative Comparison of 2D and 3D Atmospheric Corrosion Detection Methods |
title_short | Qualitative Comparison of 2D and 3D Atmospheric Corrosion Detection Methods |
title_sort | qualitative comparison of 2d and 3d atmospheric corrosion detection methods |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8269634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34209551 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14133621 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dekerfthomas qualitativecomparisonof2dand3datmosphericcorrosiondetectionmethods AT hasheminejadnavid qualitativecomparisonof2dand3datmosphericcorrosiondetectionmethods AT blomjohan qualitativecomparisonof2dand3datmosphericcorrosiondetectionmethods AT vanlanduitsteve qualitativecomparisonof2dand3datmosphericcorrosiondetectionmethods |