Cargando…
Surface Characteristics, Fluoride Release and Bond Strength Evaluation of Four Orthodontic Adhesives
Orthodontic adhesives have similar properties in terms of fluoride release, roughness, shear bond strength or cement debris for specific clinical conditions. Three commercial consecrated orthodontic adhesives (Opal Seal(®), Blugloo(®), Light Bond(®)) were compared with an experimental orthodontic ma...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8269644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34206852 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14133578 |
_version_ | 1783720629198913536 |
---|---|
author | Pastrav, Mihaela Chisnoiu, Andrea Maria Pastrav, Ovidiu Sarosi, Codruta Pordan, Doina Petean, Ioan Muntean, Alexandrina Moldovan, Marioara Chisnoiu, Radu Marcel |
author_facet | Pastrav, Mihaela Chisnoiu, Andrea Maria Pastrav, Ovidiu Sarosi, Codruta Pordan, Doina Petean, Ioan Muntean, Alexandrina Moldovan, Marioara Chisnoiu, Radu Marcel |
author_sort | Pastrav, Mihaela |
collection | PubMed |
description | Orthodontic adhesives have similar properties in terms of fluoride release, roughness, shear bond strength or cement debris for specific clinical conditions. Three commercial consecrated orthodontic adhesives (Opal Seal(®), Blugloo(®), Light Bond(®)) were compared with an experimental orthodontic material (C1). Brackets were bonded to enamel using a self-etch technique followed by adhesive application and then de-bonded 60 days later. Share bond strength evaluation, scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy and fluoride release analysis were performed. The highest amount of daily and cumulative fluoride release was obtained for the experimental material, while the lowest value was observed for Opal Seal(®). The materials evaluated in the current study presented adequate shear bond strength, with the experimental material having a mean value higher than Opal Seal and Blugloo. The atomic force microscopy measurements indicated that the smoothest initial sample is Opal Seal(®) followed by Light Bond(®). Scanning electron microscopy evaluation indicated different aspects of cement debris on the enamel and/or bracket surface, according to the type of adhesive. The experimental material C1 presented adequate properties in terms of shear bond strength, fluoride release, roughness and enamel characteristics after de-bonding, compared to the commercial materials. Under these circumstances, it can be considered for clinical testing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8269644 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82696442021-07-10 Surface Characteristics, Fluoride Release and Bond Strength Evaluation of Four Orthodontic Adhesives Pastrav, Mihaela Chisnoiu, Andrea Maria Pastrav, Ovidiu Sarosi, Codruta Pordan, Doina Petean, Ioan Muntean, Alexandrina Moldovan, Marioara Chisnoiu, Radu Marcel Materials (Basel) Article Orthodontic adhesives have similar properties in terms of fluoride release, roughness, shear bond strength or cement debris for specific clinical conditions. Three commercial consecrated orthodontic adhesives (Opal Seal(®), Blugloo(®), Light Bond(®)) were compared with an experimental orthodontic material (C1). Brackets were bonded to enamel using a self-etch technique followed by adhesive application and then de-bonded 60 days later. Share bond strength evaluation, scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy and fluoride release analysis were performed. The highest amount of daily and cumulative fluoride release was obtained for the experimental material, while the lowest value was observed for Opal Seal(®). The materials evaluated in the current study presented adequate shear bond strength, with the experimental material having a mean value higher than Opal Seal and Blugloo. The atomic force microscopy measurements indicated that the smoothest initial sample is Opal Seal(®) followed by Light Bond(®). Scanning electron microscopy evaluation indicated different aspects of cement debris on the enamel and/or bracket surface, according to the type of adhesive. The experimental material C1 presented adequate properties in terms of shear bond strength, fluoride release, roughness and enamel characteristics after de-bonding, compared to the commercial materials. Under these circumstances, it can be considered for clinical testing. MDPI 2021-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8269644/ /pubmed/34206852 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14133578 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Pastrav, Mihaela Chisnoiu, Andrea Maria Pastrav, Ovidiu Sarosi, Codruta Pordan, Doina Petean, Ioan Muntean, Alexandrina Moldovan, Marioara Chisnoiu, Radu Marcel Surface Characteristics, Fluoride Release and Bond Strength Evaluation of Four Orthodontic Adhesives |
title | Surface Characteristics, Fluoride Release and Bond Strength Evaluation of Four Orthodontic Adhesives |
title_full | Surface Characteristics, Fluoride Release and Bond Strength Evaluation of Four Orthodontic Adhesives |
title_fullStr | Surface Characteristics, Fluoride Release and Bond Strength Evaluation of Four Orthodontic Adhesives |
title_full_unstemmed | Surface Characteristics, Fluoride Release and Bond Strength Evaluation of Four Orthodontic Adhesives |
title_short | Surface Characteristics, Fluoride Release and Bond Strength Evaluation of Four Orthodontic Adhesives |
title_sort | surface characteristics, fluoride release and bond strength evaluation of four orthodontic adhesives |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8269644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34206852 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14133578 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pastravmihaela surfacecharacteristicsfluoridereleaseandbondstrengthevaluationoffourorthodonticadhesives AT chisnoiuandreamaria surfacecharacteristicsfluoridereleaseandbondstrengthevaluationoffourorthodonticadhesives AT pastravovidiu surfacecharacteristicsfluoridereleaseandbondstrengthevaluationoffourorthodonticadhesives AT sarosicodruta surfacecharacteristicsfluoridereleaseandbondstrengthevaluationoffourorthodonticadhesives AT pordandoina surfacecharacteristicsfluoridereleaseandbondstrengthevaluationoffourorthodonticadhesives AT peteanioan surfacecharacteristicsfluoridereleaseandbondstrengthevaluationoffourorthodonticadhesives AT munteanalexandrina surfacecharacteristicsfluoridereleaseandbondstrengthevaluationoffourorthodonticadhesives AT moldovanmarioara surfacecharacteristicsfluoridereleaseandbondstrengthevaluationoffourorthodonticadhesives AT chisnoiuradumarcel surfacecharacteristicsfluoridereleaseandbondstrengthevaluationoffourorthodonticadhesives |