Cargando…

Surface Characteristics, Fluoride Release and Bond Strength Evaluation of Four Orthodontic Adhesives

Orthodontic adhesives have similar properties in terms of fluoride release, roughness, shear bond strength or cement debris for specific clinical conditions. Three commercial consecrated orthodontic adhesives (Opal Seal(®), Blugloo(®), Light Bond(®)) were compared with an experimental orthodontic ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pastrav, Mihaela, Chisnoiu, Andrea Maria, Pastrav, Ovidiu, Sarosi, Codruta, Pordan, Doina, Petean, Ioan, Muntean, Alexandrina, Moldovan, Marioara, Chisnoiu, Radu Marcel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8269644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34206852
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14133578
_version_ 1783720629198913536
author Pastrav, Mihaela
Chisnoiu, Andrea Maria
Pastrav, Ovidiu
Sarosi, Codruta
Pordan, Doina
Petean, Ioan
Muntean, Alexandrina
Moldovan, Marioara
Chisnoiu, Radu Marcel
author_facet Pastrav, Mihaela
Chisnoiu, Andrea Maria
Pastrav, Ovidiu
Sarosi, Codruta
Pordan, Doina
Petean, Ioan
Muntean, Alexandrina
Moldovan, Marioara
Chisnoiu, Radu Marcel
author_sort Pastrav, Mihaela
collection PubMed
description Orthodontic adhesives have similar properties in terms of fluoride release, roughness, shear bond strength or cement debris for specific clinical conditions. Three commercial consecrated orthodontic adhesives (Opal Seal(®), Blugloo(®), Light Bond(®)) were compared with an experimental orthodontic material (C1). Brackets were bonded to enamel using a self-etch technique followed by adhesive application and then de-bonded 60 days later. Share bond strength evaluation, scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy and fluoride release analysis were performed. The highest amount of daily and cumulative fluoride release was obtained for the experimental material, while the lowest value was observed for Opal Seal(®). The materials evaluated in the current study presented adequate shear bond strength, with the experimental material having a mean value higher than Opal Seal and Blugloo. The atomic force microscopy measurements indicated that the smoothest initial sample is Opal Seal(®) followed by Light Bond(®). Scanning electron microscopy evaluation indicated different aspects of cement debris on the enamel and/or bracket surface, according to the type of adhesive. The experimental material C1 presented adequate properties in terms of shear bond strength, fluoride release, roughness and enamel characteristics after de-bonding, compared to the commercial materials. Under these circumstances, it can be considered for clinical testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8269644
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82696442021-07-10 Surface Characteristics, Fluoride Release and Bond Strength Evaluation of Four Orthodontic Adhesives Pastrav, Mihaela Chisnoiu, Andrea Maria Pastrav, Ovidiu Sarosi, Codruta Pordan, Doina Petean, Ioan Muntean, Alexandrina Moldovan, Marioara Chisnoiu, Radu Marcel Materials (Basel) Article Orthodontic adhesives have similar properties in terms of fluoride release, roughness, shear bond strength or cement debris for specific clinical conditions. Three commercial consecrated orthodontic adhesives (Opal Seal(®), Blugloo(®), Light Bond(®)) were compared with an experimental orthodontic material (C1). Brackets were bonded to enamel using a self-etch technique followed by adhesive application and then de-bonded 60 days later. Share bond strength evaluation, scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy and fluoride release analysis were performed. The highest amount of daily and cumulative fluoride release was obtained for the experimental material, while the lowest value was observed for Opal Seal(®). The materials evaluated in the current study presented adequate shear bond strength, with the experimental material having a mean value higher than Opal Seal and Blugloo. The atomic force microscopy measurements indicated that the smoothest initial sample is Opal Seal(®) followed by Light Bond(®). Scanning electron microscopy evaluation indicated different aspects of cement debris on the enamel and/or bracket surface, according to the type of adhesive. The experimental material C1 presented adequate properties in terms of shear bond strength, fluoride release, roughness and enamel characteristics after de-bonding, compared to the commercial materials. Under these circumstances, it can be considered for clinical testing. MDPI 2021-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8269644/ /pubmed/34206852 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14133578 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pastrav, Mihaela
Chisnoiu, Andrea Maria
Pastrav, Ovidiu
Sarosi, Codruta
Pordan, Doina
Petean, Ioan
Muntean, Alexandrina
Moldovan, Marioara
Chisnoiu, Radu Marcel
Surface Characteristics, Fluoride Release and Bond Strength Evaluation of Four Orthodontic Adhesives
title Surface Characteristics, Fluoride Release and Bond Strength Evaluation of Four Orthodontic Adhesives
title_full Surface Characteristics, Fluoride Release and Bond Strength Evaluation of Four Orthodontic Adhesives
title_fullStr Surface Characteristics, Fluoride Release and Bond Strength Evaluation of Four Orthodontic Adhesives
title_full_unstemmed Surface Characteristics, Fluoride Release and Bond Strength Evaluation of Four Orthodontic Adhesives
title_short Surface Characteristics, Fluoride Release and Bond Strength Evaluation of Four Orthodontic Adhesives
title_sort surface characteristics, fluoride release and bond strength evaluation of four orthodontic adhesives
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8269644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34206852
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14133578
work_keys_str_mv AT pastravmihaela surfacecharacteristicsfluoridereleaseandbondstrengthevaluationoffourorthodonticadhesives
AT chisnoiuandreamaria surfacecharacteristicsfluoridereleaseandbondstrengthevaluationoffourorthodonticadhesives
AT pastravovidiu surfacecharacteristicsfluoridereleaseandbondstrengthevaluationoffourorthodonticadhesives
AT sarosicodruta surfacecharacteristicsfluoridereleaseandbondstrengthevaluationoffourorthodonticadhesives
AT pordandoina surfacecharacteristicsfluoridereleaseandbondstrengthevaluationoffourorthodonticadhesives
AT peteanioan surfacecharacteristicsfluoridereleaseandbondstrengthevaluationoffourorthodonticadhesives
AT munteanalexandrina surfacecharacteristicsfluoridereleaseandbondstrengthevaluationoffourorthodonticadhesives
AT moldovanmarioara surfacecharacteristicsfluoridereleaseandbondstrengthevaluationoffourorthodonticadhesives
AT chisnoiuradumarcel surfacecharacteristicsfluoridereleaseandbondstrengthevaluationoffourorthodonticadhesives