Cargando…
Photocatalytic Activity of Cu(2)S/WO(3) and Cu(2)S/SnO(2) Heterostructures for Indoor Air Treatment
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are commonly found in indoor spaces (e.g., homes or offices) and are often related to various illnesses, some of them with carcinogenic potential. The origins of VOC release in the indoor environment are in office products, building materials, electronics, cleaning...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8269650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34209012 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14133656 |
Sumario: | Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are commonly found in indoor spaces (e.g., homes or offices) and are often related to various illnesses, some of them with carcinogenic potential. The origins of VOC release in the indoor environment are in office products, building materials, electronics, cleaning products, furniture, and maintenance products. VOC removal can be done based on two types of technologies: adsorption in specific materials and decomposition via oxidative processes. The present article reports the development and photocatalytic activity of two heterostructures (Cu(2)S/WO(3) and Cu(2)S/SnO(2)) used for indoor air decontamination. The acetaldehyde removal rate is discussed in correlation with the S-scheme mechanisms established between the heterostructure components but also comparatively with the bare catalysts’ activity. Acetaldehyde was considered as a VOC reference because it was found by the International Agency for Research on Cancer to be one of the most frequent air toxins with potential carcinogenic effects. The samples contained monoclinic WO(3), tetragonal SnO(2), and orthorhombic Cu(2)S crystalline structures. The Cu(2)S crystallite size in the heterostructure varied from 75.9 to 82.4 Å, depending on the metal oxide substrate. The highest photocatalytic efficiency (75.7%) corresponded to Cu(2)S/SnO(2), with a constant rate of 0.106 s(−1) (which was three times faster than WO(3) or SnO(2) and seven and a half times faster than Cu(2)S). |
---|