Cargando…

Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting Parts

The structural optimization of manufacturable casting parts is still a challenging and time-consuming task. Today, topology optimization is followed by a manual reconstruction of the design proposal and a process assurance simulation to endorse the design proposal. Consequently, this process is iter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosnitschek, Tobias, Erber, Maximilian, Hartmann, Christoph, Volk, Wolfram, Rieg, Frank, Tremmel, Stephan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8269844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34279285
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14133715
_version_ 1783720674732277760
author Rosnitschek, Tobias
Erber, Maximilian
Hartmann, Christoph
Volk, Wolfram
Rieg, Frank
Tremmel, Stephan
author_facet Rosnitschek, Tobias
Erber, Maximilian
Hartmann, Christoph
Volk, Wolfram
Rieg, Frank
Tremmel, Stephan
author_sort Rosnitschek, Tobias
collection PubMed
description The structural optimization of manufacturable casting parts is still a challenging and time-consuming task. Today, topology optimization is followed by a manual reconstruction of the design proposal and a process assurance simulation to endorse the design proposal. Consequently, this process is iteratively repeated until it reaches a satisfying compromise. This article shows a method to combine structural optimization and process assurance results to generate automatically structure- and process-optimized die casting parts using implicit geometry modeling. Therefore, evaluation criteria are developed to evaluate the current design proposal and qualitatively measure the improvement of manufacturability between two iterations. For testing the proposed method, we use a cantilever beam as an example of proof. The combined iterative method is compared to manual designed parts and a direct optimization approach and evaluated for mechanical performance and manufacturability. The combination of topology optimization (TO) and process assurance (PA) results is automated and shows a significant enhancement to the manual reconstruction of the design proposals. Further, the improvement of manufacturability is better or equivalent to previous work in the field while using less computational effort, which emphasizes the need for suitable metamodels to significantly reduce the effort for process assurance and enable much shorter iteration times.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8269844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82698442021-07-10 Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting Parts Rosnitschek, Tobias Erber, Maximilian Hartmann, Christoph Volk, Wolfram Rieg, Frank Tremmel, Stephan Materials (Basel) Article The structural optimization of manufacturable casting parts is still a challenging and time-consuming task. Today, topology optimization is followed by a manual reconstruction of the design proposal and a process assurance simulation to endorse the design proposal. Consequently, this process is iteratively repeated until it reaches a satisfying compromise. This article shows a method to combine structural optimization and process assurance results to generate automatically structure- and process-optimized die casting parts using implicit geometry modeling. Therefore, evaluation criteria are developed to evaluate the current design proposal and qualitatively measure the improvement of manufacturability between two iterations. For testing the proposed method, we use a cantilever beam as an example of proof. The combined iterative method is compared to manual designed parts and a direct optimization approach and evaluated for mechanical performance and manufacturability. The combination of topology optimization (TO) and process assurance (PA) results is automated and shows a significant enhancement to the manual reconstruction of the design proposals. Further, the improvement of manufacturability is better or equivalent to previous work in the field while using less computational effort, which emphasizes the need for suitable metamodels to significantly reduce the effort for process assurance and enable much shorter iteration times. MDPI 2021-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8269844/ /pubmed/34279285 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14133715 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rosnitschek, Tobias
Erber, Maximilian
Hartmann, Christoph
Volk, Wolfram
Rieg, Frank
Tremmel, Stephan
Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting Parts
title Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting Parts
title_full Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting Parts
title_fullStr Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting Parts
title_full_unstemmed Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting Parts
title_short Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting Parts
title_sort combining structural optimization and process assurance in implicit modelling for casting parts
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8269844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34279285
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14133715
work_keys_str_mv AT rosnitschektobias combiningstructuraloptimizationandprocessassuranceinimplicitmodellingforcastingparts
AT erbermaximilian combiningstructuraloptimizationandprocessassuranceinimplicitmodellingforcastingparts
AT hartmannchristoph combiningstructuraloptimizationandprocessassuranceinimplicitmodellingforcastingparts
AT volkwolfram combiningstructuraloptimizationandprocessassuranceinimplicitmodellingforcastingparts
AT riegfrank combiningstructuraloptimizationandprocessassuranceinimplicitmodellingforcastingparts
AT tremmelstephan combiningstructuraloptimizationandprocessassuranceinimplicitmodellingforcastingparts