Cargando…
Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting Parts
The structural optimization of manufacturable casting parts is still a challenging and time-consuming task. Today, topology optimization is followed by a manual reconstruction of the design proposal and a process assurance simulation to endorse the design proposal. Consequently, this process is iter...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8269844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34279285 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14133715 |
_version_ | 1783720674732277760 |
---|---|
author | Rosnitschek, Tobias Erber, Maximilian Hartmann, Christoph Volk, Wolfram Rieg, Frank Tremmel, Stephan |
author_facet | Rosnitschek, Tobias Erber, Maximilian Hartmann, Christoph Volk, Wolfram Rieg, Frank Tremmel, Stephan |
author_sort | Rosnitschek, Tobias |
collection | PubMed |
description | The structural optimization of manufacturable casting parts is still a challenging and time-consuming task. Today, topology optimization is followed by a manual reconstruction of the design proposal and a process assurance simulation to endorse the design proposal. Consequently, this process is iteratively repeated until it reaches a satisfying compromise. This article shows a method to combine structural optimization and process assurance results to generate automatically structure- and process-optimized die casting parts using implicit geometry modeling. Therefore, evaluation criteria are developed to evaluate the current design proposal and qualitatively measure the improvement of manufacturability between two iterations. For testing the proposed method, we use a cantilever beam as an example of proof. The combined iterative method is compared to manual designed parts and a direct optimization approach and evaluated for mechanical performance and manufacturability. The combination of topology optimization (TO) and process assurance (PA) results is automated and shows a significant enhancement to the manual reconstruction of the design proposals. Further, the improvement of manufacturability is better or equivalent to previous work in the field while using less computational effort, which emphasizes the need for suitable metamodels to significantly reduce the effort for process assurance and enable much shorter iteration times. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8269844 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82698442021-07-10 Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting Parts Rosnitschek, Tobias Erber, Maximilian Hartmann, Christoph Volk, Wolfram Rieg, Frank Tremmel, Stephan Materials (Basel) Article The structural optimization of manufacturable casting parts is still a challenging and time-consuming task. Today, topology optimization is followed by a manual reconstruction of the design proposal and a process assurance simulation to endorse the design proposal. Consequently, this process is iteratively repeated until it reaches a satisfying compromise. This article shows a method to combine structural optimization and process assurance results to generate automatically structure- and process-optimized die casting parts using implicit geometry modeling. Therefore, evaluation criteria are developed to evaluate the current design proposal and qualitatively measure the improvement of manufacturability between two iterations. For testing the proposed method, we use a cantilever beam as an example of proof. The combined iterative method is compared to manual designed parts and a direct optimization approach and evaluated for mechanical performance and manufacturability. The combination of topology optimization (TO) and process assurance (PA) results is automated and shows a significant enhancement to the manual reconstruction of the design proposals. Further, the improvement of manufacturability is better or equivalent to previous work in the field while using less computational effort, which emphasizes the need for suitable metamodels to significantly reduce the effort for process assurance and enable much shorter iteration times. MDPI 2021-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8269844/ /pubmed/34279285 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14133715 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Rosnitschek, Tobias Erber, Maximilian Hartmann, Christoph Volk, Wolfram Rieg, Frank Tremmel, Stephan Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting Parts |
title | Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting Parts |
title_full | Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting Parts |
title_fullStr | Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting Parts |
title_full_unstemmed | Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting Parts |
title_short | Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting Parts |
title_sort | combining structural optimization and process assurance in implicit modelling for casting parts |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8269844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34279285 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14133715 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rosnitschektobias combiningstructuraloptimizationandprocessassuranceinimplicitmodellingforcastingparts AT erbermaximilian combiningstructuraloptimizationandprocessassuranceinimplicitmodellingforcastingparts AT hartmannchristoph combiningstructuraloptimizationandprocessassuranceinimplicitmodellingforcastingparts AT volkwolfram combiningstructuraloptimizationandprocessassuranceinimplicitmodellingforcastingparts AT riegfrank combiningstructuraloptimizationandprocessassuranceinimplicitmodellingforcastingparts AT tremmelstephan combiningstructuraloptimizationandprocessassuranceinimplicitmodellingforcastingparts |