Cargando…
Outcomes of Combination Therapy using Aflibercept and Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant versus Dexamethasone Monotherapy for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the combination therapy of intravitreal aflibercept 2 mg (Eylea(®)) and a sustained-release dexamethasone 0.7 mg intravitreal implant (Ozurdex(®)) versus dexamethasone alone in providing better visual acuity in eyes with macular edem...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8270014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34321818 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_297_19 |
_version_ | 1783720709392957440 |
---|---|
author | Harb, Walid Chidiac, Georgio Harb, Georges |
author_facet | Harb, Walid Chidiac, Georgio Harb, Georges |
author_sort | Harb, Walid |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the combination therapy of intravitreal aflibercept 2 mg (Eylea(®)) and a sustained-release dexamethasone 0.7 mg intravitreal implant (Ozurdex(®)) versus dexamethasone alone in providing better visual acuity in eyes with macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). METHODS: Seventy-four eyes of 74 patients with treatment-naïve ME secondary to RVO were included in this prospective nonrandomized case series and were studied over a 12-month follow-up period. Patients in the dexamethasone monotherapy group were treated with an initial Ozurdex(®) injection while patients in the combination therapy group were treated with an Eylea(®) injection followed 2 weeks later by an Ozurdex(®) injection. The treatment was repeated as needed. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure were evaluated periodically. The primary outcome measure was the BCVA. The secondary outcome measures included CMT, number of retreatments, and safety parameters. RESULTS: At 1 year, the primary endpoint was met. Patients receiving combined therapy had better mean visual acuity changes from baseline compared to those receiving monotherapy (0.369 ± 0.221 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] vs. 0.218 ± 0.171 logMAR; P = 0.002). The secondary endpoints were not met since there were no significant differences in mean reductions in CMT (272.67 ± 82.35 vs. 248.11 ± 159.73; P = 0.412) and the mean number of retreatments was similar in the two groups (1.75 ± 1.13 vs. 1.42 ± 0.64; P = 0.126). CONCLUSION: Aflibercept with dexamethasone implants achieved better visual outcomes compared to dexamethasone monotherapy with no significant differences in intravitreal retreatment rates at the 1(st) year in eyes with ME secondary to RVO. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8270014 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82700142021-07-27 Outcomes of Combination Therapy using Aflibercept and Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant versus Dexamethasone Monotherapy for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion Harb, Walid Chidiac, Georgio Harb, Georges Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the combination therapy of intravitreal aflibercept 2 mg (Eylea(®)) and a sustained-release dexamethasone 0.7 mg intravitreal implant (Ozurdex(®)) versus dexamethasone alone in providing better visual acuity in eyes with macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). METHODS: Seventy-four eyes of 74 patients with treatment-naïve ME secondary to RVO were included in this prospective nonrandomized case series and were studied over a 12-month follow-up period. Patients in the dexamethasone monotherapy group were treated with an initial Ozurdex(®) injection while patients in the combination therapy group were treated with an Eylea(®) injection followed 2 weeks later by an Ozurdex(®) injection. The treatment was repeated as needed. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure were evaluated periodically. The primary outcome measure was the BCVA. The secondary outcome measures included CMT, number of retreatments, and safety parameters. RESULTS: At 1 year, the primary endpoint was met. Patients receiving combined therapy had better mean visual acuity changes from baseline compared to those receiving monotherapy (0.369 ± 0.221 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] vs. 0.218 ± 0.171 logMAR; P = 0.002). The secondary endpoints were not met since there were no significant differences in mean reductions in CMT (272.67 ± 82.35 vs. 248.11 ± 159.73; P = 0.412) and the mean number of retreatments was similar in the two groups (1.75 ± 1.13 vs. 1.42 ± 0.64; P = 0.126). CONCLUSION: Aflibercept with dexamethasone implants achieved better visual outcomes compared to dexamethasone monotherapy with no significant differences in intravitreal retreatment rates at the 1(st) year in eyes with ME secondary to RVO. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8270014/ /pubmed/34321818 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_297_19 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Harb, Walid Chidiac, Georgio Harb, Georges Outcomes of Combination Therapy using Aflibercept and Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant versus Dexamethasone Monotherapy for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion |
title | Outcomes of Combination Therapy using Aflibercept and Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant versus Dexamethasone Monotherapy for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion |
title_full | Outcomes of Combination Therapy using Aflibercept and Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant versus Dexamethasone Monotherapy for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion |
title_fullStr | Outcomes of Combination Therapy using Aflibercept and Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant versus Dexamethasone Monotherapy for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes of Combination Therapy using Aflibercept and Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant versus Dexamethasone Monotherapy for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion |
title_short | Outcomes of Combination Therapy using Aflibercept and Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant versus Dexamethasone Monotherapy for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion |
title_sort | outcomes of combination therapy using aflibercept and dexamethasone intravitreal implant versus dexamethasone monotherapy for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8270014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34321818 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_297_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harbwalid outcomesofcombinationtherapyusingafliberceptanddexamethasoneintravitrealimplantversusdexamethasonemonotherapyformacularedemasecondarytoretinalveinocclusion AT chidiacgeorgio outcomesofcombinationtherapyusingafliberceptanddexamethasoneintravitrealimplantversusdexamethasonemonotherapyformacularedemasecondarytoretinalveinocclusion AT harbgeorges outcomesofcombinationtherapyusingafliberceptanddexamethasoneintravitrealimplantversusdexamethasonemonotherapyformacularedemasecondarytoretinalveinocclusion |