Cargando…

Outcomes of Combination Therapy using Aflibercept and Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant versus Dexamethasone Monotherapy for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the combination therapy of intravitreal aflibercept 2 mg (Eylea(®)) and a sustained-release dexamethasone 0.7 mg intravitreal implant (Ozurdex(®)) versus dexamethasone alone in providing better visual acuity in eyes with macular edem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harb, Walid, Chidiac, Georgio, Harb, Georges
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8270014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34321818
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_297_19
_version_ 1783720709392957440
author Harb, Walid
Chidiac, Georgio
Harb, Georges
author_facet Harb, Walid
Chidiac, Georgio
Harb, Georges
author_sort Harb, Walid
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the combination therapy of intravitreal aflibercept 2 mg (Eylea(®)) and a sustained-release dexamethasone 0.7 mg intravitreal implant (Ozurdex(®)) versus dexamethasone alone in providing better visual acuity in eyes with macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). METHODS: Seventy-four eyes of 74 patients with treatment-naïve ME secondary to RVO were included in this prospective nonrandomized case series and were studied over a 12-month follow-up period. Patients in the dexamethasone monotherapy group were treated with an initial Ozurdex(®) injection while patients in the combination therapy group were treated with an Eylea(®) injection followed 2 weeks later by an Ozurdex(®) injection. The treatment was repeated as needed. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure were evaluated periodically. The primary outcome measure was the BCVA. The secondary outcome measures included CMT, number of retreatments, and safety parameters. RESULTS: At 1 year, the primary endpoint was met. Patients receiving combined therapy had better mean visual acuity changes from baseline compared to those receiving monotherapy (0.369 ± 0.221 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] vs. 0.218 ± 0.171 logMAR; P = 0.002). The secondary endpoints were not met since there were no significant differences in mean reductions in CMT (272.67 ± 82.35 vs. 248.11 ± 159.73; P = 0.412) and the mean number of retreatments was similar in the two groups (1.75 ± 1.13 vs. 1.42 ± 0.64; P = 0.126). CONCLUSION: Aflibercept with dexamethasone implants achieved better visual outcomes compared to dexamethasone monotherapy with no significant differences in intravitreal retreatment rates at the 1(st) year in eyes with ME secondary to RVO.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8270014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82700142021-07-27 Outcomes of Combination Therapy using Aflibercept and Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant versus Dexamethasone Monotherapy for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion Harb, Walid Chidiac, Georgio Harb, Georges Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the combination therapy of intravitreal aflibercept 2 mg (Eylea(®)) and a sustained-release dexamethasone 0.7 mg intravitreal implant (Ozurdex(®)) versus dexamethasone alone in providing better visual acuity in eyes with macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). METHODS: Seventy-four eyes of 74 patients with treatment-naïve ME secondary to RVO were included in this prospective nonrandomized case series and were studied over a 12-month follow-up period. Patients in the dexamethasone monotherapy group were treated with an initial Ozurdex(®) injection while patients in the combination therapy group were treated with an Eylea(®) injection followed 2 weeks later by an Ozurdex(®) injection. The treatment was repeated as needed. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure were evaluated periodically. The primary outcome measure was the BCVA. The secondary outcome measures included CMT, number of retreatments, and safety parameters. RESULTS: At 1 year, the primary endpoint was met. Patients receiving combined therapy had better mean visual acuity changes from baseline compared to those receiving monotherapy (0.369 ± 0.221 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] vs. 0.218 ± 0.171 logMAR; P = 0.002). The secondary endpoints were not met since there were no significant differences in mean reductions in CMT (272.67 ± 82.35 vs. 248.11 ± 159.73; P = 0.412) and the mean number of retreatments was similar in the two groups (1.75 ± 1.13 vs. 1.42 ± 0.64; P = 0.126). CONCLUSION: Aflibercept with dexamethasone implants achieved better visual outcomes compared to dexamethasone monotherapy with no significant differences in intravitreal retreatment rates at the 1(st) year in eyes with ME secondary to RVO. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8270014/ /pubmed/34321818 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_297_19 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Harb, Walid
Chidiac, Georgio
Harb, Georges
Outcomes of Combination Therapy using Aflibercept and Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant versus Dexamethasone Monotherapy for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion
title Outcomes of Combination Therapy using Aflibercept and Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant versus Dexamethasone Monotherapy for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion
title_full Outcomes of Combination Therapy using Aflibercept and Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant versus Dexamethasone Monotherapy for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion
title_fullStr Outcomes of Combination Therapy using Aflibercept and Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant versus Dexamethasone Monotherapy for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of Combination Therapy using Aflibercept and Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant versus Dexamethasone Monotherapy for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion
title_short Outcomes of Combination Therapy using Aflibercept and Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant versus Dexamethasone Monotherapy for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion
title_sort outcomes of combination therapy using aflibercept and dexamethasone intravitreal implant versus dexamethasone monotherapy for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8270014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34321818
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_297_19
work_keys_str_mv AT harbwalid outcomesofcombinationtherapyusingafliberceptanddexamethasoneintravitrealimplantversusdexamethasonemonotherapyformacularedemasecondarytoretinalveinocclusion
AT chidiacgeorgio outcomesofcombinationtherapyusingafliberceptanddexamethasoneintravitrealimplantversusdexamethasonemonotherapyformacularedemasecondarytoretinalveinocclusion
AT harbgeorges outcomesofcombinationtherapyusingafliberceptanddexamethasoneintravitrealimplantversusdexamethasonemonotherapyformacularedemasecondarytoretinalveinocclusion