Cargando…

A Critical Review of LET-Based Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Plan Evaluation and Optimization for Head and Neck Cancer Management

In this review article, we review the 3 important aspects of linear-energy-transfer (LET) in intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for head and neck (H&N) cancer management. Accurate LET calculation methods are essential for LET-guided plan evaluation and optimization, which can be calculate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deng, Wei, Yang, Yunze, Liu, Chenbin, Bues, Martin, Mohan, Radhe, Wong, William W., Foote, Robert H., Patel, Samir H., Liu, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Particle Therapy Co-operative Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8270082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34285934
http://dx.doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-20-00049.1
_version_ 1783720725388984320
author Deng, Wei
Yang, Yunze
Liu, Chenbin
Bues, Martin
Mohan, Radhe
Wong, William W.
Foote, Robert H.
Patel, Samir H.
Liu, Wei
author_facet Deng, Wei
Yang, Yunze
Liu, Chenbin
Bues, Martin
Mohan, Radhe
Wong, William W.
Foote, Robert H.
Patel, Samir H.
Liu, Wei
author_sort Deng, Wei
collection PubMed
description In this review article, we review the 3 important aspects of linear-energy-transfer (LET) in intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for head and neck (H&N) cancer management. Accurate LET calculation methods are essential for LET-guided plan evaluation and optimization, which can be calculated either by analytical methods or by Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. Recently, some new 3D analytical approaches to calculate LET accurately and efficiently have been proposed. On the other hand, several fast MC codes have also been developed to speed up the MC simulation by simplifying nonessential physics models and/or using the graphics processor unit (GPU)–acceleration approach. Some concepts related to LET are also briefly summarized including (1) dose-weighted versus fluence-weighted LET; (2) restricted versus unrestricted LET; and (3) microdosimetry versus macrodosimetry. LET-guided plan evaluation has been clinically done in some proton centers. Recently, more and more studies using patient outcomes as the biological endpoint have shown a positive correlation between high LET and adverse events sites, indicating the importance of LET-guided plan evaluation in proton clinics. Various LET-guided plan optimization methods have been proposed to generate proton plans to achieve biologically optimized IMPT plans. Different optimization frameworks were used, including 2-step optimization, 1-step optimization, and worst-case robust optimization. They either indirectly or directly optimize the LET distribution in patients while trying to maintain the same dose distribution and plan robustness. It is important to consider the impact of uncertainties in LET-guided optimization (ie, LET-guided robust optimization) in IMPT, since IMPT is sensitive to uncertainties including both the dose and LET distributions. We believe that the advancement of the LET-guided plan evaluation and optimization will help us exploit the unique biological characteristics of proton beams to improve the therapeutic ratio of IMPT to treat H&N and other cancers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8270082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Particle Therapy Co-operative Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82700822021-07-19 A Critical Review of LET-Based Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Plan Evaluation and Optimization for Head and Neck Cancer Management Deng, Wei Yang, Yunze Liu, Chenbin Bues, Martin Mohan, Radhe Wong, William W. Foote, Robert H. Patel, Samir H. Liu, Wei Int J Part Ther Physics In this review article, we review the 3 important aspects of linear-energy-transfer (LET) in intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for head and neck (H&N) cancer management. Accurate LET calculation methods are essential for LET-guided plan evaluation and optimization, which can be calculated either by analytical methods or by Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. Recently, some new 3D analytical approaches to calculate LET accurately and efficiently have been proposed. On the other hand, several fast MC codes have also been developed to speed up the MC simulation by simplifying nonessential physics models and/or using the graphics processor unit (GPU)–acceleration approach. Some concepts related to LET are also briefly summarized including (1) dose-weighted versus fluence-weighted LET; (2) restricted versus unrestricted LET; and (3) microdosimetry versus macrodosimetry. LET-guided plan evaluation has been clinically done in some proton centers. Recently, more and more studies using patient outcomes as the biological endpoint have shown a positive correlation between high LET and adverse events sites, indicating the importance of LET-guided plan evaluation in proton clinics. Various LET-guided plan optimization methods have been proposed to generate proton plans to achieve biologically optimized IMPT plans. Different optimization frameworks were used, including 2-step optimization, 1-step optimization, and worst-case robust optimization. They either indirectly or directly optimize the LET distribution in patients while trying to maintain the same dose distribution and plan robustness. It is important to consider the impact of uncertainties in LET-guided optimization (ie, LET-guided robust optimization) in IMPT, since IMPT is sensitive to uncertainties including both the dose and LET distributions. We believe that the advancement of the LET-guided plan evaluation and optimization will help us exploit the unique biological characteristics of proton beams to improve the therapeutic ratio of IMPT to treat H&N and other cancers. The Particle Therapy Co-operative Group 2021-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8270082/ /pubmed/34285934 http://dx.doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-20-00049.1 Text en ©Copyright 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Physics
Deng, Wei
Yang, Yunze
Liu, Chenbin
Bues, Martin
Mohan, Radhe
Wong, William W.
Foote, Robert H.
Patel, Samir H.
Liu, Wei
A Critical Review of LET-Based Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Plan Evaluation and Optimization for Head and Neck Cancer Management
title A Critical Review of LET-Based Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Plan Evaluation and Optimization for Head and Neck Cancer Management
title_full A Critical Review of LET-Based Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Plan Evaluation and Optimization for Head and Neck Cancer Management
title_fullStr A Critical Review of LET-Based Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Plan Evaluation and Optimization for Head and Neck Cancer Management
title_full_unstemmed A Critical Review of LET-Based Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Plan Evaluation and Optimization for Head and Neck Cancer Management
title_short A Critical Review of LET-Based Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Plan Evaluation and Optimization for Head and Neck Cancer Management
title_sort critical review of let-based intensity-modulated proton therapy plan evaluation and optimization for head and neck cancer management
topic Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8270082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34285934
http://dx.doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-20-00049.1
work_keys_str_mv AT dengwei acriticalreviewofletbasedintensitymodulatedprotontherapyplanevaluationandoptimizationforheadandneckcancermanagement
AT yangyunze acriticalreviewofletbasedintensitymodulatedprotontherapyplanevaluationandoptimizationforheadandneckcancermanagement
AT liuchenbin acriticalreviewofletbasedintensitymodulatedprotontherapyplanevaluationandoptimizationforheadandneckcancermanagement
AT buesmartin acriticalreviewofletbasedintensitymodulatedprotontherapyplanevaluationandoptimizationforheadandneckcancermanagement
AT mohanradhe acriticalreviewofletbasedintensitymodulatedprotontherapyplanevaluationandoptimizationforheadandneckcancermanagement
AT wongwilliamw acriticalreviewofletbasedintensitymodulatedprotontherapyplanevaluationandoptimizationforheadandneckcancermanagement
AT footeroberth acriticalreviewofletbasedintensitymodulatedprotontherapyplanevaluationandoptimizationforheadandneckcancermanagement
AT patelsamirh acriticalreviewofletbasedintensitymodulatedprotontherapyplanevaluationandoptimizationforheadandneckcancermanagement
AT liuwei acriticalreviewofletbasedintensitymodulatedprotontherapyplanevaluationandoptimizationforheadandneckcancermanagement
AT dengwei criticalreviewofletbasedintensitymodulatedprotontherapyplanevaluationandoptimizationforheadandneckcancermanagement
AT yangyunze criticalreviewofletbasedintensitymodulatedprotontherapyplanevaluationandoptimizationforheadandneckcancermanagement
AT liuchenbin criticalreviewofletbasedintensitymodulatedprotontherapyplanevaluationandoptimizationforheadandneckcancermanagement
AT buesmartin criticalreviewofletbasedintensitymodulatedprotontherapyplanevaluationandoptimizationforheadandneckcancermanagement
AT mohanradhe criticalreviewofletbasedintensitymodulatedprotontherapyplanevaluationandoptimizationforheadandneckcancermanagement
AT wongwilliamw criticalreviewofletbasedintensitymodulatedprotontherapyplanevaluationandoptimizationforheadandneckcancermanagement
AT footeroberth criticalreviewofletbasedintensitymodulatedprotontherapyplanevaluationandoptimizationforheadandneckcancermanagement
AT patelsamirh criticalreviewofletbasedintensitymodulatedprotontherapyplanevaluationandoptimizationforheadandneckcancermanagement
AT liuwei criticalreviewofletbasedintensitymodulatedprotontherapyplanevaluationandoptimizationforheadandneckcancermanagement