Cargando…

Spot Scanning Proton Therapy for Sinonasal Malignant Tumors

PURPOSE: Treatment of sinonasal malignant tumors is challenging, and evidence to establish a standard treatment is limited. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of spot scanning proton therapy (SSPT) for sinonasal malignant tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakajima, Koichiro, Iwata, Hiromitsu, Hattori, Yukiko, Nomura, Kento, Hashimoto, Shingo, Toshito, Toshiyuki, Hayashi, Kensuke, Kuroda, Yo, Fukano, Hideo, Ogino, Hiroyuki, Shibamoto, Yuta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Particle Therapy Co-operative Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8270097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34285946
http://dx.doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-D-20-00043.1
_version_ 1783720728999231488
author Nakajima, Koichiro
Iwata, Hiromitsu
Hattori, Yukiko
Nomura, Kento
Hashimoto, Shingo
Toshito, Toshiyuki
Hayashi, Kensuke
Kuroda, Yo
Fukano, Hideo
Ogino, Hiroyuki
Shibamoto, Yuta
author_facet Nakajima, Koichiro
Iwata, Hiromitsu
Hattori, Yukiko
Nomura, Kento
Hashimoto, Shingo
Toshito, Toshiyuki
Hayashi, Kensuke
Kuroda, Yo
Fukano, Hideo
Ogino, Hiroyuki
Shibamoto, Yuta
author_sort Nakajima, Koichiro
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Treatment of sinonasal malignant tumors is challenging, and evidence to establish a standard treatment is limited. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of spot scanning proton therapy (SSPT) for sinonasal malignant tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with sinonasal malignant tumors (T1-4bN0-2M0) who underwent SSPT between May 2014 and September 2019. The prescription dose was typically either 60 GyRBE in 15 fractions or 60.8 GyRBE in 16 fractions for mucosal melanoma and 70.2 GyRBE in 26 fractions for other histologic subtypes. Endpoints included local control (LC), progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), and incidence of toxicity. Prognostic factors were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. RESULTS: Of 62 enrolled patients, the common histologic subtypes were mucosal melanoma (35%), squamous cell carcinoma (27%), adenoid cystic carcinoma (16%), and olfactory neuroblastoma (10%). Locally advanced stages were common (T3 in 42% and T4 in 53%). Treatment-naïve tumors and postsurgical recurrent tumors accounted for 73% and 27%, respectively. No patient had previous radiotherapy. The median follow-up was 17 months (range, 6-66) for all patients and 21.5 months (range, 6-66) for survivors. The 2-year LC, progression-free survival, and OS rates of all patients were 92%, 50%, and 76%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed histology as a prognostic factor for OS, being higher in adenoid cystic carcinoma and olfactory neuroblastoma than in other tumors. Sixteen grade ≥3 late toxicities were observed in 12 patients (19%), including 11 events resulting in visual impairment; the most common was cataract. There was 1 grade 4 toxicity, and there were no grade 5 toxicities. CONCLUSION: SSPT was well tolerated and yielded good LC for sinonasal malignant tumors. Although we consider SSPT to be a leading treatment modality, further studies are required to establish its status as a standard treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8270097
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Particle Therapy Co-operative Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82700972021-07-19 Spot Scanning Proton Therapy for Sinonasal Malignant Tumors Nakajima, Koichiro Iwata, Hiromitsu Hattori, Yukiko Nomura, Kento Hashimoto, Shingo Toshito, Toshiyuki Hayashi, Kensuke Kuroda, Yo Fukano, Hideo Ogino, Hiroyuki Shibamoto, Yuta Int J Part Ther Clinical PURPOSE: Treatment of sinonasal malignant tumors is challenging, and evidence to establish a standard treatment is limited. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of spot scanning proton therapy (SSPT) for sinonasal malignant tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with sinonasal malignant tumors (T1-4bN0-2M0) who underwent SSPT between May 2014 and September 2019. The prescription dose was typically either 60 GyRBE in 15 fractions or 60.8 GyRBE in 16 fractions for mucosal melanoma and 70.2 GyRBE in 26 fractions for other histologic subtypes. Endpoints included local control (LC), progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), and incidence of toxicity. Prognostic factors were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. RESULTS: Of 62 enrolled patients, the common histologic subtypes were mucosal melanoma (35%), squamous cell carcinoma (27%), adenoid cystic carcinoma (16%), and olfactory neuroblastoma (10%). Locally advanced stages were common (T3 in 42% and T4 in 53%). Treatment-naïve tumors and postsurgical recurrent tumors accounted for 73% and 27%, respectively. No patient had previous radiotherapy. The median follow-up was 17 months (range, 6-66) for all patients and 21.5 months (range, 6-66) for survivors. The 2-year LC, progression-free survival, and OS rates of all patients were 92%, 50%, and 76%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed histology as a prognostic factor for OS, being higher in adenoid cystic carcinoma and olfactory neuroblastoma than in other tumors. Sixteen grade ≥3 late toxicities were observed in 12 patients (19%), including 11 events resulting in visual impairment; the most common was cataract. There was 1 grade 4 toxicity, and there were no grade 5 toxicities. CONCLUSION: SSPT was well tolerated and yielded good LC for sinonasal malignant tumors. Although we consider SSPT to be a leading treatment modality, further studies are required to establish its status as a standard treatment. The Particle Therapy Co-operative Group 2021-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8270097/ /pubmed/34285946 http://dx.doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-D-20-00043.1 Text en ©Copyright 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Clinical
Nakajima, Koichiro
Iwata, Hiromitsu
Hattori, Yukiko
Nomura, Kento
Hashimoto, Shingo
Toshito, Toshiyuki
Hayashi, Kensuke
Kuroda, Yo
Fukano, Hideo
Ogino, Hiroyuki
Shibamoto, Yuta
Spot Scanning Proton Therapy for Sinonasal Malignant Tumors
title Spot Scanning Proton Therapy for Sinonasal Malignant Tumors
title_full Spot Scanning Proton Therapy for Sinonasal Malignant Tumors
title_fullStr Spot Scanning Proton Therapy for Sinonasal Malignant Tumors
title_full_unstemmed Spot Scanning Proton Therapy for Sinonasal Malignant Tumors
title_short Spot Scanning Proton Therapy for Sinonasal Malignant Tumors
title_sort spot scanning proton therapy for sinonasal malignant tumors
topic Clinical
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8270097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34285946
http://dx.doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-D-20-00043.1
work_keys_str_mv AT nakajimakoichiro spotscanningprotontherapyforsinonasalmalignanttumors
AT iwatahiromitsu spotscanningprotontherapyforsinonasalmalignanttumors
AT hattoriyukiko spotscanningprotontherapyforsinonasalmalignanttumors
AT nomurakento spotscanningprotontherapyforsinonasalmalignanttumors
AT hashimotoshingo spotscanningprotontherapyforsinonasalmalignanttumors
AT toshitotoshiyuki spotscanningprotontherapyforsinonasalmalignanttumors
AT hayashikensuke spotscanningprotontherapyforsinonasalmalignanttumors
AT kurodayo spotscanningprotontherapyforsinonasalmalignanttumors
AT fukanohideo spotscanningprotontherapyforsinonasalmalignanttumors
AT oginohiroyuki spotscanningprotontherapyforsinonasalmalignanttumors
AT shibamotoyuta spotscanningprotontherapyforsinonasalmalignanttumors