Cargando…

Evaluating extraction methods to study canine urine microbiota

The urinary microbiota is the collection of microbes present in urine that may play a role in host health. Studies of urine microbiota have traditionally relied upon culturing methods aimed at identifying pathogens. However, recent culture-free sequencing studies of the urine microbiota have determi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mrofchak, Ryan, Madden, Christopher, Evans, Morgan V., Hale, Vanessa L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8270191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34242284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253989
_version_ 1783720751122087936
author Mrofchak, Ryan
Madden, Christopher
Evans, Morgan V.
Hale, Vanessa L.
author_facet Mrofchak, Ryan
Madden, Christopher
Evans, Morgan V.
Hale, Vanessa L.
author_sort Mrofchak, Ryan
collection PubMed
description The urinary microbiota is the collection of microbes present in urine that may play a role in host health. Studies of urine microbiota have traditionally relied upon culturing methods aimed at identifying pathogens. However, recent culture-free sequencing studies of the urine microbiota have determined that a diverse array of microbes is present in health and disease. To study these microbes and their potential role in diseases like bladder cancer or interstitial cystitis, consistent extraction and detection of bacterial DNA from urine is critical. However, urine is a low biomass substrate, requiring sensitive methods to capture DNA and making the risk of contamination high. To address this challenge, we collected urine samples from ten healthy dogs and extracted DNA from each sample using five different commercially available extraction methods. Extraction methods were compared based on total and bacterial DNA concentrations and bacterial community composition and diversity assessed through 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Significant differences in the urinary microbiota were observed by dog and sex but not extraction method. The Bacteremia Kit yielded the highest total DNA concentrations (Kruskal-Wallis, p = 0.165, not significant) and the highest bacterial DNA concentrations (Kruskal-Wallis, p = 0.044). Bacteremia also extracted bacterial DNA from the greatest number of samples. Taken together, these results suggest that the Bacteremia kit is an effective option for studying the urine microbiota. This work lays the foundation to study the urine microbiome in a wide range of urogenital diseases in dogs and other species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8270191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82701912021-07-21 Evaluating extraction methods to study canine urine microbiota Mrofchak, Ryan Madden, Christopher Evans, Morgan V. Hale, Vanessa L. PLoS One Research Article The urinary microbiota is the collection of microbes present in urine that may play a role in host health. Studies of urine microbiota have traditionally relied upon culturing methods aimed at identifying pathogens. However, recent culture-free sequencing studies of the urine microbiota have determined that a diverse array of microbes is present in health and disease. To study these microbes and their potential role in diseases like bladder cancer or interstitial cystitis, consistent extraction and detection of bacterial DNA from urine is critical. However, urine is a low biomass substrate, requiring sensitive methods to capture DNA and making the risk of contamination high. To address this challenge, we collected urine samples from ten healthy dogs and extracted DNA from each sample using five different commercially available extraction methods. Extraction methods were compared based on total and bacterial DNA concentrations and bacterial community composition and diversity assessed through 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Significant differences in the urinary microbiota were observed by dog and sex but not extraction method. The Bacteremia Kit yielded the highest total DNA concentrations (Kruskal-Wallis, p = 0.165, not significant) and the highest bacterial DNA concentrations (Kruskal-Wallis, p = 0.044). Bacteremia also extracted bacterial DNA from the greatest number of samples. Taken together, these results suggest that the Bacteremia kit is an effective option for studying the urine microbiota. This work lays the foundation to study the urine microbiome in a wide range of urogenital diseases in dogs and other species. Public Library of Science 2021-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8270191/ /pubmed/34242284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253989 Text en © 2021 Mrofchak et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mrofchak, Ryan
Madden, Christopher
Evans, Morgan V.
Hale, Vanessa L.
Evaluating extraction methods to study canine urine microbiota
title Evaluating extraction methods to study canine urine microbiota
title_full Evaluating extraction methods to study canine urine microbiota
title_fullStr Evaluating extraction methods to study canine urine microbiota
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating extraction methods to study canine urine microbiota
title_short Evaluating extraction methods to study canine urine microbiota
title_sort evaluating extraction methods to study canine urine microbiota
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8270191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34242284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253989
work_keys_str_mv AT mrofchakryan evaluatingextractionmethodstostudycanineurinemicrobiota
AT maddenchristopher evaluatingextractionmethodstostudycanineurinemicrobiota
AT evansmorganv evaluatingextractionmethodstostudycanineurinemicrobiota
AT halevanessal evaluatingextractionmethodstostudycanineurinemicrobiota