Cargando…

Taking a critical stance towards mixed methods research: A cross-disciplinary qualitative secondary analysis of researchers’ views

Recent growth and institutionalization in the field of mixed methods research has provided fertile ground for a wide range of thoughtful criticism of how this research approach has been developed and conceptualized by some members of the mixed methods community. This criticism reflects the increasin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fàbregues, Sergi, Escalante-Barrios, Elsa Lucia, Molina-Azorin, José Francisco, Hong, Quan Nha, Verd, Joan Miquel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8270395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34242219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252014
_version_ 1783720793108119552
author Fàbregues, Sergi
Escalante-Barrios, Elsa Lucia
Molina-Azorin, José Francisco
Hong, Quan Nha
Verd, Joan Miquel
author_facet Fàbregues, Sergi
Escalante-Barrios, Elsa Lucia
Molina-Azorin, José Francisco
Hong, Quan Nha
Verd, Joan Miquel
author_sort Fàbregues, Sergi
collection PubMed
description Recent growth and institutionalization in the field of mixed methods research has provided fertile ground for a wide range of thoughtful criticism of how this research approach has been developed and conceptualized by some members of the mixed methods community. This criticism reflects the increasing maturity of the field as well as the different theoretical perspectives and methodological practices of researchers in different disciplines. While debates addressing these criticisms are likely to lead to valuable insights, no empirical studies have been carried out to date that have investigated researchers’ critical views on the development and conceptualization of mixed methods research. This study examines the criticisms of the mixed methods field raised by a cross-national sample of researchers in education, nursing, psychology, and sociology. We carried out a secondary analysis of semi-structured interviews with 42 researchers and identified 11 different criticisms, which we classified in four domains: essence of mixed methods, philosophy, procedures, and politics. The criticisms related to the procedures domain were equally distributed among the four disciplines, while those related to the essence, philosophy and politics domains were more common among sociologists. Based on our findings, we argue that the divergence of views on foundational issues in this field reflects researchers’ affiliation to different communities of practice, each having its own principles, values, and interests. We suggest that a greater awareness of this divergence of perspectives could help researchers establish effective collaboration and anticipate potential challenges when working with researchers having different methodological approaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8270395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82703952021-07-21 Taking a critical stance towards mixed methods research: A cross-disciplinary qualitative secondary analysis of researchers’ views Fàbregues, Sergi Escalante-Barrios, Elsa Lucia Molina-Azorin, José Francisco Hong, Quan Nha Verd, Joan Miquel PLoS One Research Article Recent growth and institutionalization in the field of mixed methods research has provided fertile ground for a wide range of thoughtful criticism of how this research approach has been developed and conceptualized by some members of the mixed methods community. This criticism reflects the increasing maturity of the field as well as the different theoretical perspectives and methodological practices of researchers in different disciplines. While debates addressing these criticisms are likely to lead to valuable insights, no empirical studies have been carried out to date that have investigated researchers’ critical views on the development and conceptualization of mixed methods research. This study examines the criticisms of the mixed methods field raised by a cross-national sample of researchers in education, nursing, psychology, and sociology. We carried out a secondary analysis of semi-structured interviews with 42 researchers and identified 11 different criticisms, which we classified in four domains: essence of mixed methods, philosophy, procedures, and politics. The criticisms related to the procedures domain were equally distributed among the four disciplines, while those related to the essence, philosophy and politics domains were more common among sociologists. Based on our findings, we argue that the divergence of views on foundational issues in this field reflects researchers’ affiliation to different communities of practice, each having its own principles, values, and interests. We suggest that a greater awareness of this divergence of perspectives could help researchers establish effective collaboration and anticipate potential challenges when working with researchers having different methodological approaches. Public Library of Science 2021-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8270395/ /pubmed/34242219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252014 Text en © 2021 Fàbregues et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fàbregues, Sergi
Escalante-Barrios, Elsa Lucia
Molina-Azorin, José Francisco
Hong, Quan Nha
Verd, Joan Miquel
Taking a critical stance towards mixed methods research: A cross-disciplinary qualitative secondary analysis of researchers’ views
title Taking a critical stance towards mixed methods research: A cross-disciplinary qualitative secondary analysis of researchers’ views
title_full Taking a critical stance towards mixed methods research: A cross-disciplinary qualitative secondary analysis of researchers’ views
title_fullStr Taking a critical stance towards mixed methods research: A cross-disciplinary qualitative secondary analysis of researchers’ views
title_full_unstemmed Taking a critical stance towards mixed methods research: A cross-disciplinary qualitative secondary analysis of researchers’ views
title_short Taking a critical stance towards mixed methods research: A cross-disciplinary qualitative secondary analysis of researchers’ views
title_sort taking a critical stance towards mixed methods research: a cross-disciplinary qualitative secondary analysis of researchers’ views
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8270395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34242219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252014
work_keys_str_mv AT fabreguessergi takingacriticalstancetowardsmixedmethodsresearchacrossdisciplinaryqualitativesecondaryanalysisofresearchersviews
AT escalantebarrioselsalucia takingacriticalstancetowardsmixedmethodsresearchacrossdisciplinaryqualitativesecondaryanalysisofresearchersviews
AT molinaazorinjosefrancisco takingacriticalstancetowardsmixedmethodsresearchacrossdisciplinaryqualitativesecondaryanalysisofresearchersviews
AT hongquannha takingacriticalstancetowardsmixedmethodsresearchacrossdisciplinaryqualitativesecondaryanalysisofresearchersviews
AT verdjoanmiquel takingacriticalstancetowardsmixedmethodsresearchacrossdisciplinaryqualitativesecondaryanalysisofresearchersviews