Cargando…

Where does the money go to? Cost analysis of gynecological patients with a benign condition

OBJECTIVES: The impact of benign gynecological conditions on life of women and on costs for the society is high. The purpose of this study is to gain knowledge and understanding of costs of the treatment of these disorders in order to be able to improve the clinical care processes, gain insight into...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pynnä, Kristiina, Räsänen, Pirjo, Roine, Risto P., Vuorela, Piia, Sintonen, Harri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8270439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34242306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254124
_version_ 1783720802102804480
author Pynnä, Kristiina
Räsänen, Pirjo
Roine, Risto P.
Vuorela, Piia
Sintonen, Harri
author_facet Pynnä, Kristiina
Räsänen, Pirjo
Roine, Risto P.
Vuorela, Piia
Sintonen, Harri
author_sort Pynnä, Kristiina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The impact of benign gynecological conditions on life of women and on costs for the society is high. The purpose of this study is to gain knowledge and understanding of costs of the treatment of these disorders in order to be able to improve the clinical care processes, gain insight into feasible savings opportunities and to allocate funds wisely. METHODS: The healthcare processes of 311 women attending university or community hospitals in the Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District between June 2012 and August 2013 due to a benign gynecological condition were followed up for two years and treatment costs analysed. RESULTS: Total direct hospital costs averaged 689€ at six months and 2194€ at two years. The most expensive treatment was that of uterine fibroids in the short term and that of endometriosis and fibroids later on. Costs did not depend on hospital size. Surgical operations caused nearly half of hospital costs. Productivity loss caused biggest expenses outside of the hospital. LNG-IUD (levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device) accounted for the largest pharmaceutical costs for patients. Hospital treatment was associated with a reduced need for outpatient services during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of direct hospital costs arise over time. This stresses the need for prolonged healthcare management. To control costs, the need for repetitive doctors’ appointments, monitoring tests, and ward treatments should be carefully evaluated. Procedures not needing an operation theatre (for example hysteroscopy for polypectomy), should be done ambulatorily.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8270439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82704392021-07-21 Where does the money go to? Cost analysis of gynecological patients with a benign condition Pynnä, Kristiina Räsänen, Pirjo Roine, Risto P. Vuorela, Piia Sintonen, Harri PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: The impact of benign gynecological conditions on life of women and on costs for the society is high. The purpose of this study is to gain knowledge and understanding of costs of the treatment of these disorders in order to be able to improve the clinical care processes, gain insight into feasible savings opportunities and to allocate funds wisely. METHODS: The healthcare processes of 311 women attending university or community hospitals in the Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District between June 2012 and August 2013 due to a benign gynecological condition were followed up for two years and treatment costs analysed. RESULTS: Total direct hospital costs averaged 689€ at six months and 2194€ at two years. The most expensive treatment was that of uterine fibroids in the short term and that of endometriosis and fibroids later on. Costs did not depend on hospital size. Surgical operations caused nearly half of hospital costs. Productivity loss caused biggest expenses outside of the hospital. LNG-IUD (levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device) accounted for the largest pharmaceutical costs for patients. Hospital treatment was associated with a reduced need for outpatient services during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of direct hospital costs arise over time. This stresses the need for prolonged healthcare management. To control costs, the need for repetitive doctors’ appointments, monitoring tests, and ward treatments should be carefully evaluated. Procedures not needing an operation theatre (for example hysteroscopy for polypectomy), should be done ambulatorily. Public Library of Science 2021-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8270439/ /pubmed/34242306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254124 Text en © 2021 Pynnä et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pynnä, Kristiina
Räsänen, Pirjo
Roine, Risto P.
Vuorela, Piia
Sintonen, Harri
Where does the money go to? Cost analysis of gynecological patients with a benign condition
title Where does the money go to? Cost analysis of gynecological patients with a benign condition
title_full Where does the money go to? Cost analysis of gynecological patients with a benign condition
title_fullStr Where does the money go to? Cost analysis of gynecological patients with a benign condition
title_full_unstemmed Where does the money go to? Cost analysis of gynecological patients with a benign condition
title_short Where does the money go to? Cost analysis of gynecological patients with a benign condition
title_sort where does the money go to? cost analysis of gynecological patients with a benign condition
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8270439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34242306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254124
work_keys_str_mv AT pynnakristiina wheredoesthemoneygotocostanalysisofgynecologicalpatientswithabenigncondition
AT rasanenpirjo wheredoesthemoneygotocostanalysisofgynecologicalpatientswithabenigncondition
AT roineristop wheredoesthemoneygotocostanalysisofgynecologicalpatientswithabenigncondition
AT vuorelapiia wheredoesthemoneygotocostanalysisofgynecologicalpatientswithabenigncondition
AT sintonenharri wheredoesthemoneygotocostanalysisofgynecologicalpatientswithabenigncondition