Cargando…

Reassuring Patients With Low Back Pain in Primary Care Consultations: Does it Happen, and Does it Matter? A ChiCo Cohort Study

Reassurance is an important part of treatment for low back pain (LBP). The Consultation-based Reassurance Questionnaire measures patients’ perceived reassurance after health care consultations on 4 subdomains (ie, Data-gathering, Relationship-building, Generic reassurance, Cognitive reassurance). Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simonsen, Gitte D., Jensen, Tue S., Kongsted, Alice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8270505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34010222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000946
_version_ 1783720817128898560
author Simonsen, Gitte D.
Jensen, Tue S.
Kongsted, Alice
author_facet Simonsen, Gitte D.
Jensen, Tue S.
Kongsted, Alice
author_sort Simonsen, Gitte D.
collection PubMed
description Reassurance is an important part of treatment for low back pain (LBP). The Consultation-based Reassurance Questionnaire measures patients’ perceived reassurance after health care consultations on 4 subdomains (ie, Data-gathering, Relationship-building, Generic reassurance, Cognitive reassurance). The objectives of this study were to investigate associations between the level of reassurance and outcomes and to investigate if the associations were moderated by patients’ risk profile. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients consulting chiropractors for LBP were emailed the Consultation-based Reassurance Questionnaire directly after the consultation. Outcomes were Global Perceived Effect (GPE) after 2 weeks, and pain (Numeric Rating Scale) and disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire) 2 weeks and 3 months following treatment. Associations with GPE were tested in logistic mixed models. Associations between each reassurance domain and pain and disability were tested in longitudinal analyses using linear mixed models. Moderations by risk profile were tested by introducing an interaction between risk groups and reassurance level. All models were controlled for several potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 2056 patients were included in the study, with 46% reporting LBP for less than a week. Associations between reassurance level and improvement in LBP intensity and disability were weak but positive, whereas associations with GPE were potentially clinically relevant. None of the associations were moderated by psychological risk profile. DISCUSSION: Identified associations between reassurance and outcomes were weak, however, for GPE the association might be of a clinically relevant magnitude. The causal relationship is unclear, but with communication always present in a consultation these results suggest that efforts to optimize clinician-patient communication might be worthwhile, also for people with very recent onset of LBP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8270505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82705052021-07-15 Reassuring Patients With Low Back Pain in Primary Care Consultations: Does it Happen, and Does it Matter? A ChiCo Cohort Study Simonsen, Gitte D. Jensen, Tue S. Kongsted, Alice Clin J Pain Original Articles Reassurance is an important part of treatment for low back pain (LBP). The Consultation-based Reassurance Questionnaire measures patients’ perceived reassurance after health care consultations on 4 subdomains (ie, Data-gathering, Relationship-building, Generic reassurance, Cognitive reassurance). The objectives of this study were to investigate associations between the level of reassurance and outcomes and to investigate if the associations were moderated by patients’ risk profile. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients consulting chiropractors for LBP were emailed the Consultation-based Reassurance Questionnaire directly after the consultation. Outcomes were Global Perceived Effect (GPE) after 2 weeks, and pain (Numeric Rating Scale) and disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire) 2 weeks and 3 months following treatment. Associations with GPE were tested in logistic mixed models. Associations between each reassurance domain and pain and disability were tested in longitudinal analyses using linear mixed models. Moderations by risk profile were tested by introducing an interaction between risk groups and reassurance level. All models were controlled for several potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 2056 patients were included in the study, with 46% reporting LBP for less than a week. Associations between reassurance level and improvement in LBP intensity and disability were weak but positive, whereas associations with GPE were potentially clinically relevant. None of the associations were moderated by psychological risk profile. DISCUSSION: Identified associations between reassurance and outcomes were weak, however, for GPE the association might be of a clinically relevant magnitude. The causal relationship is unclear, but with communication always present in a consultation these results suggest that efforts to optimize clinician-patient communication might be worthwhile, also for people with very recent onset of LBP. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-08 2021-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8270505/ /pubmed/34010222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000946 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Articles
Simonsen, Gitte D.
Jensen, Tue S.
Kongsted, Alice
Reassuring Patients With Low Back Pain in Primary Care Consultations: Does it Happen, and Does it Matter? A ChiCo Cohort Study
title Reassuring Patients With Low Back Pain in Primary Care Consultations: Does it Happen, and Does it Matter? A ChiCo Cohort Study
title_full Reassuring Patients With Low Back Pain in Primary Care Consultations: Does it Happen, and Does it Matter? A ChiCo Cohort Study
title_fullStr Reassuring Patients With Low Back Pain in Primary Care Consultations: Does it Happen, and Does it Matter? A ChiCo Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Reassuring Patients With Low Back Pain in Primary Care Consultations: Does it Happen, and Does it Matter? A ChiCo Cohort Study
title_short Reassuring Patients With Low Back Pain in Primary Care Consultations: Does it Happen, and Does it Matter? A ChiCo Cohort Study
title_sort reassuring patients with low back pain in primary care consultations: does it happen, and does it matter? a chico cohort study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8270505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34010222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000946
work_keys_str_mv AT simonsengitted reassuringpatientswithlowbackpaininprimarycareconsultationsdoesithappenanddoesitmatterachicocohortstudy
AT jensentues reassuringpatientswithlowbackpaininprimarycareconsultationsdoesithappenanddoesitmatterachicocohortstudy
AT kongstedalice reassuringpatientswithlowbackpaininprimarycareconsultationsdoesithappenanddoesitmatterachicocohortstudy