Cargando…

The use of an alternating magnetic field in the resorption of postoperative joint effusion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized double-blind controlled trial

CONTEXT: There are no scientific reports unambiguously describing the efficacy of alternating magnetic field therapy in patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in the early postoperative period. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of using an alternating magnet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ogrodzka-Ciechanowicz, Katarzyna, Głąb, Grzegorz, Ciszek-Radwan, Elżbieta, Ślusarski, Jakub, Gądek, Artur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8270597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34232202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026572
_version_ 1783720828935864320
author Ogrodzka-Ciechanowicz, Katarzyna
Głąb, Grzegorz
Ciszek-Radwan, Elżbieta
Ślusarski, Jakub
Gądek, Artur
author_facet Ogrodzka-Ciechanowicz, Katarzyna
Głąb, Grzegorz
Ciszek-Radwan, Elżbieta
Ślusarski, Jakub
Gądek, Artur
author_sort Ogrodzka-Ciechanowicz, Katarzyna
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: There are no scientific reports unambiguously describing the efficacy of alternating magnetic field therapy in patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in the early postoperative period. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of using an alternating magnetic field in the resorption of postoperative joint effusion in patients after ACL reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Inpatients. PARTICIPANTS: Forty patients were enrolled in the trial. However, the final study group consisted of 38 patients (28 men and 10 women) after ACL reconstruction who were randomly divided into an experimental group (19 patients) and a control group (19 patients). INTERVENTION: Each group received magnetic field therapy in the postoperative period, but only 1 apparatus emitted a magnetic field (the experimental group). Patients used the apparatus every day for 30 minutes for the next 11 days. The parameters in both devices were the same—3 mT and 10 Hz. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The measurement of the knee circumference and range of motion were made. The knee circumference measurement was performed before magnetic field therapy began and for 11 days after magnetic field treatment. The active knee range of motion was evaluated before and after magnetic field therapy was completed. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in the reduction of post-operative joint effusion or knee joint function. CONCLUSION: In patients after ACL reconstruction, in whom an alternating magnetic field was used to treat postoperative joint effusion, there were no beneficial effects on the analyzed variables compared to the control group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8270597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82705972021-07-12 The use of an alternating magnetic field in the resorption of postoperative joint effusion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized double-blind controlled trial Ogrodzka-Ciechanowicz, Katarzyna Głąb, Grzegorz Ciszek-Radwan, Elżbieta Ślusarski, Jakub Gądek, Artur Medicine (Baltimore) 6300 CONTEXT: There are no scientific reports unambiguously describing the efficacy of alternating magnetic field therapy in patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in the early postoperative period. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of using an alternating magnetic field in the resorption of postoperative joint effusion in patients after ACL reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Inpatients. PARTICIPANTS: Forty patients were enrolled in the trial. However, the final study group consisted of 38 patients (28 men and 10 women) after ACL reconstruction who were randomly divided into an experimental group (19 patients) and a control group (19 patients). INTERVENTION: Each group received magnetic field therapy in the postoperative period, but only 1 apparatus emitted a magnetic field (the experimental group). Patients used the apparatus every day for 30 minutes for the next 11 days. The parameters in both devices were the same—3 mT and 10 Hz. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The measurement of the knee circumference and range of motion were made. The knee circumference measurement was performed before magnetic field therapy began and for 11 days after magnetic field treatment. The active knee range of motion was evaluated before and after magnetic field therapy was completed. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in the reduction of post-operative joint effusion or knee joint function. CONCLUSION: In patients after ACL reconstruction, in whom an alternating magnetic field was used to treat postoperative joint effusion, there were no beneficial effects on the analyzed variables compared to the control group. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8270597/ /pubmed/34232202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026572 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle 6300
Ogrodzka-Ciechanowicz, Katarzyna
Głąb, Grzegorz
Ciszek-Radwan, Elżbieta
Ślusarski, Jakub
Gądek, Artur
The use of an alternating magnetic field in the resorption of postoperative joint effusion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized double-blind controlled trial
title The use of an alternating magnetic field in the resorption of postoperative joint effusion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized double-blind controlled trial
title_full The use of an alternating magnetic field in the resorption of postoperative joint effusion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized double-blind controlled trial
title_fullStr The use of an alternating magnetic field in the resorption of postoperative joint effusion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized double-blind controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The use of an alternating magnetic field in the resorption of postoperative joint effusion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized double-blind controlled trial
title_short The use of an alternating magnetic field in the resorption of postoperative joint effusion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized double-blind controlled trial
title_sort use of an alternating magnetic field in the resorption of postoperative joint effusion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized double-blind controlled trial
topic 6300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8270597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34232202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026572
work_keys_str_mv AT ogrodzkaciechanowiczkatarzyna theuseofanalternatingmagneticfieldintheresorptionofpostoperativejointeffusionfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT głabgrzegorz theuseofanalternatingmagneticfieldintheresorptionofpostoperativejointeffusionfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT ciszekradwanelzbieta theuseofanalternatingmagneticfieldintheresorptionofpostoperativejointeffusionfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT slusarskijakub theuseofanalternatingmagneticfieldintheresorptionofpostoperativejointeffusionfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT gadekartur theuseofanalternatingmagneticfieldintheresorptionofpostoperativejointeffusionfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT ogrodzkaciechanowiczkatarzyna useofanalternatingmagneticfieldintheresorptionofpostoperativejointeffusionfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT głabgrzegorz useofanalternatingmagneticfieldintheresorptionofpostoperativejointeffusionfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT ciszekradwanelzbieta useofanalternatingmagneticfieldintheresorptionofpostoperativejointeffusionfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT slusarskijakub useofanalternatingmagneticfieldintheresorptionofpostoperativejointeffusionfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT gadekartur useofanalternatingmagneticfieldintheresorptionofpostoperativejointeffusionfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial