Cargando…
The use of an alternating magnetic field in the resorption of postoperative joint effusion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized double-blind controlled trial
CONTEXT: There are no scientific reports unambiguously describing the efficacy of alternating magnetic field therapy in patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in the early postoperative period. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of using an alternating magnet...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8270597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34232202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026572 |
_version_ | 1783720828935864320 |
---|---|
author | Ogrodzka-Ciechanowicz, Katarzyna Głąb, Grzegorz Ciszek-Radwan, Elżbieta Ślusarski, Jakub Gądek, Artur |
author_facet | Ogrodzka-Ciechanowicz, Katarzyna Głąb, Grzegorz Ciszek-Radwan, Elżbieta Ślusarski, Jakub Gądek, Artur |
author_sort | Ogrodzka-Ciechanowicz, Katarzyna |
collection | PubMed |
description | CONTEXT: There are no scientific reports unambiguously describing the efficacy of alternating magnetic field therapy in patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in the early postoperative period. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of using an alternating magnetic field in the resorption of postoperative joint effusion in patients after ACL reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Inpatients. PARTICIPANTS: Forty patients were enrolled in the trial. However, the final study group consisted of 38 patients (28 men and 10 women) after ACL reconstruction who were randomly divided into an experimental group (19 patients) and a control group (19 patients). INTERVENTION: Each group received magnetic field therapy in the postoperative period, but only 1 apparatus emitted a magnetic field (the experimental group). Patients used the apparatus every day for 30 minutes for the next 11 days. The parameters in both devices were the same—3 mT and 10 Hz. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The measurement of the knee circumference and range of motion were made. The knee circumference measurement was performed before magnetic field therapy began and for 11 days after magnetic field treatment. The active knee range of motion was evaluated before and after magnetic field therapy was completed. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in the reduction of post-operative joint effusion or knee joint function. CONCLUSION: In patients after ACL reconstruction, in whom an alternating magnetic field was used to treat postoperative joint effusion, there were no beneficial effects on the analyzed variables compared to the control group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8270597 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82705972021-07-12 The use of an alternating magnetic field in the resorption of postoperative joint effusion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized double-blind controlled trial Ogrodzka-Ciechanowicz, Katarzyna Głąb, Grzegorz Ciszek-Radwan, Elżbieta Ślusarski, Jakub Gądek, Artur Medicine (Baltimore) 6300 CONTEXT: There are no scientific reports unambiguously describing the efficacy of alternating magnetic field therapy in patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in the early postoperative period. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of using an alternating magnetic field in the resorption of postoperative joint effusion in patients after ACL reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Inpatients. PARTICIPANTS: Forty patients were enrolled in the trial. However, the final study group consisted of 38 patients (28 men and 10 women) after ACL reconstruction who were randomly divided into an experimental group (19 patients) and a control group (19 patients). INTERVENTION: Each group received magnetic field therapy in the postoperative period, but only 1 apparatus emitted a magnetic field (the experimental group). Patients used the apparatus every day for 30 minutes for the next 11 days. The parameters in both devices were the same—3 mT and 10 Hz. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The measurement of the knee circumference and range of motion were made. The knee circumference measurement was performed before magnetic field therapy began and for 11 days after magnetic field treatment. The active knee range of motion was evaluated before and after magnetic field therapy was completed. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in the reduction of post-operative joint effusion or knee joint function. CONCLUSION: In patients after ACL reconstruction, in whom an alternating magnetic field was used to treat postoperative joint effusion, there were no beneficial effects on the analyzed variables compared to the control group. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8270597/ /pubmed/34232202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026572 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | 6300 Ogrodzka-Ciechanowicz, Katarzyna Głąb, Grzegorz Ciszek-Radwan, Elżbieta Ślusarski, Jakub Gądek, Artur The use of an alternating magnetic field in the resorption of postoperative joint effusion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized double-blind controlled trial |
title | The use of an alternating magnetic field in the resorption of postoperative joint effusion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized double-blind controlled trial |
title_full | The use of an alternating magnetic field in the resorption of postoperative joint effusion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized double-blind controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The use of an alternating magnetic field in the resorption of postoperative joint effusion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized double-blind controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of an alternating magnetic field in the resorption of postoperative joint effusion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized double-blind controlled trial |
title_short | The use of an alternating magnetic field in the resorption of postoperative joint effusion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized double-blind controlled trial |
title_sort | use of an alternating magnetic field in the resorption of postoperative joint effusion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized double-blind controlled trial |
topic | 6300 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8270597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34232202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026572 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ogrodzkaciechanowiczkatarzyna theuseofanalternatingmagneticfieldintheresorptionofpostoperativejointeffusionfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT głabgrzegorz theuseofanalternatingmagneticfieldintheresorptionofpostoperativejointeffusionfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT ciszekradwanelzbieta theuseofanalternatingmagneticfieldintheresorptionofpostoperativejointeffusionfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT slusarskijakub theuseofanalternatingmagneticfieldintheresorptionofpostoperativejointeffusionfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT gadekartur theuseofanalternatingmagneticfieldintheresorptionofpostoperativejointeffusionfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT ogrodzkaciechanowiczkatarzyna useofanalternatingmagneticfieldintheresorptionofpostoperativejointeffusionfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT głabgrzegorz useofanalternatingmagneticfieldintheresorptionofpostoperativejointeffusionfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT ciszekradwanelzbieta useofanalternatingmagneticfieldintheresorptionofpostoperativejointeffusionfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT slusarskijakub useofanalternatingmagneticfieldintheresorptionofpostoperativejointeffusionfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT gadekartur useofanalternatingmagneticfieldintheresorptionofpostoperativejointeffusionfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial |