Cargando…
Replace and repair: Biomimetic bioprinting for effective muscle engineering
The debilitating effects of muscle damage, either through ischemic injury or volumetric muscle loss (VML), can have significant impacts on patients, and yet there are few effective treatments. This challenge arises when function is degraded due to significant amounts of skeletal muscle loss, beyond...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AIP Publishing LLC
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8270648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34258499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0040764 |
_version_ | 1783720840580300800 |
---|---|
author | Blake, Cooper Massey, Oliver Boyd-Moss, Mitchell Firipis, Kate Rifai, Aaqil Franks, Stephanie Quigley, Anita Kapsa, Robert Nisbet, David R. Williams, Richard J. |
author_facet | Blake, Cooper Massey, Oliver Boyd-Moss, Mitchell Firipis, Kate Rifai, Aaqil Franks, Stephanie Quigley, Anita Kapsa, Robert Nisbet, David R. Williams, Richard J. |
author_sort | Blake, Cooper |
collection | PubMed |
description | The debilitating effects of muscle damage, either through ischemic injury or volumetric muscle loss (VML), can have significant impacts on patients, and yet there are few effective treatments. This challenge arises when function is degraded due to significant amounts of skeletal muscle loss, beyond the regenerative ability of endogenous repair mechanisms. Currently available surgical interventions for VML are quite invasive and cannot typically restore function adequately. In response to this, many new bioengineering studies implicate 3D bioprinting as a viable option. Bioprinting for VML repair includes three distinct phases: printing and seeding, growth and maturation, and implantation and application. Although this 3D bioprinting technology has existed for several decades, the advent of more advanced and novel printing techniques has brought us closer to clinical applications. Recent studies have overcome previous limitations in diffusion distance with novel microchannel construct architectures and improved myotubule alignment with highly biomimetic nanostructures. These structures may also enhance angiogenic and nervous ingrowth post-implantation, though further research to improve these parameters has been limited. Inclusion of neural cells has also shown to improve myoblast maturation and development of neuromuscular junctions, bringing us one step closer to functional, implantable skeletal muscle constructs. Given the current state of skeletal muscle 3D bioprinting, the most pressing future avenues of research include furthering our understanding of the physical and biochemical mechanisms of myotube development and expanding our control over macroscopic and microscopic construct structures. Further to this, current investigation needs to be expanded from immunocompromised rodent and murine myoblast models to more clinically applicable human cell lines as we move closer to viable therapeutic implementation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8270648 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | AIP Publishing LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82706482021-07-12 Replace and repair: Biomimetic bioprinting for effective muscle engineering Blake, Cooper Massey, Oliver Boyd-Moss, Mitchell Firipis, Kate Rifai, Aaqil Franks, Stephanie Quigley, Anita Kapsa, Robert Nisbet, David R. Williams, Richard J. APL Bioeng Reviews The debilitating effects of muscle damage, either through ischemic injury or volumetric muscle loss (VML), can have significant impacts on patients, and yet there are few effective treatments. This challenge arises when function is degraded due to significant amounts of skeletal muscle loss, beyond the regenerative ability of endogenous repair mechanisms. Currently available surgical interventions for VML are quite invasive and cannot typically restore function adequately. In response to this, many new bioengineering studies implicate 3D bioprinting as a viable option. Bioprinting for VML repair includes three distinct phases: printing and seeding, growth and maturation, and implantation and application. Although this 3D bioprinting technology has existed for several decades, the advent of more advanced and novel printing techniques has brought us closer to clinical applications. Recent studies have overcome previous limitations in diffusion distance with novel microchannel construct architectures and improved myotubule alignment with highly biomimetic nanostructures. These structures may also enhance angiogenic and nervous ingrowth post-implantation, though further research to improve these parameters has been limited. Inclusion of neural cells has also shown to improve myoblast maturation and development of neuromuscular junctions, bringing us one step closer to functional, implantable skeletal muscle constructs. Given the current state of skeletal muscle 3D bioprinting, the most pressing future avenues of research include furthering our understanding of the physical and biochemical mechanisms of myotube development and expanding our control over macroscopic and microscopic construct structures. Further to this, current investigation needs to be expanded from immunocompromised rodent and murine myoblast models to more clinically applicable human cell lines as we move closer to viable therapeutic implementation. AIP Publishing LLC 2021-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8270648/ /pubmed/34258499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0040764 Text en © 2021 Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Reviews Blake, Cooper Massey, Oliver Boyd-Moss, Mitchell Firipis, Kate Rifai, Aaqil Franks, Stephanie Quigley, Anita Kapsa, Robert Nisbet, David R. Williams, Richard J. Replace and repair: Biomimetic bioprinting for effective muscle engineering |
title | Replace and repair: Biomimetic bioprinting for effective muscle engineering |
title_full | Replace and repair: Biomimetic bioprinting for effective muscle engineering |
title_fullStr | Replace and repair: Biomimetic bioprinting for effective muscle engineering |
title_full_unstemmed | Replace and repair: Biomimetic bioprinting for effective muscle engineering |
title_short | Replace and repair: Biomimetic bioprinting for effective muscle engineering |
title_sort | replace and repair: biomimetic bioprinting for effective muscle engineering |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8270648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34258499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0040764 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blakecooper replaceandrepairbiomimeticbioprintingforeffectivemuscleengineering AT masseyoliver replaceandrepairbiomimeticbioprintingforeffectivemuscleengineering AT boydmossmitchell replaceandrepairbiomimeticbioprintingforeffectivemuscleengineering AT firipiskate replaceandrepairbiomimeticbioprintingforeffectivemuscleengineering AT rifaiaaqil replaceandrepairbiomimeticbioprintingforeffectivemuscleengineering AT franksstephanie replaceandrepairbiomimeticbioprintingforeffectivemuscleengineering AT quigleyanita replaceandrepairbiomimeticbioprintingforeffectivemuscleengineering AT kapsarobert replaceandrepairbiomimeticbioprintingforeffectivemuscleengineering AT nisbetdavidr replaceandrepairbiomimeticbioprintingforeffectivemuscleengineering AT williamsrichardj replaceandrepairbiomimeticbioprintingforeffectivemuscleengineering |