Cargando…

Inhibitory Control Deficits in Children with Tic Disorders Revealed by Object-Hit-and-Avoid Task

BACKGROUND: Tic disorders may reflect impaired inhibitory control. This has been evaluated using different behavioural tasks, yielding mixed results. Our objective was to test inhibitory control in children with tics through simultaneous presentation of multiple, mobile stimuli. METHODS: Sixty-four...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cothros, Nicholas, Medina, Alex, Martino, Davide, Dukelow, Sean P., Hawe, Rachel L., Kirton, Adam, Ganos, Christos, Nosratmirshekarlou, Elaheh, Pringsheim, Tamara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8270726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34306065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8825091
_version_ 1783720854322937856
author Cothros, Nicholas
Medina, Alex
Martino, Davide
Dukelow, Sean P.
Hawe, Rachel L.
Kirton, Adam
Ganos, Christos
Nosratmirshekarlou, Elaheh
Pringsheim, Tamara
author_facet Cothros, Nicholas
Medina, Alex
Martino, Davide
Dukelow, Sean P.
Hawe, Rachel L.
Kirton, Adam
Ganos, Christos
Nosratmirshekarlou, Elaheh
Pringsheim, Tamara
author_sort Cothros, Nicholas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tic disorders may reflect impaired inhibitory control. This has been evaluated using different behavioural tasks, yielding mixed results. Our objective was to test inhibitory control in children with tics through simultaneous presentation of multiple, mobile stimuli. METHODS: Sixty-four children with tics (mean age 12.4 years; 7.5-18.5) were evaluated using a validated robotic bimanual exoskeleton protocol (Kinarm) in an object-hit-and-avoid task, in which target and distractor objects moved across a screen and participants aimed to hit only the targets while avoiding distractors. Performance was compared to 146 typically developing controls (mean age 13 years; 6.1-19.9). The primary outcome was the percentage of distractors struck. RESULTS: ANCOVA (age as covariate) showed participants struck significantly more distractors (participants without comorbid ADHD, 22.71% [SE 1.47]; participants with comorbid ADHD, 23.56% [1.47]; and controls, 15.59% [0.68]). Participants with comorbid ADHD struck significantly fewer targets (119.74 [2.77]) than controls, but no difference was found between participants without comorbid ADHD (122.66 [2.77]) and controls (127.00 [1.28]). Participants and controls did not differ significantly in movement speed and movement area. Just over 20% of participants with tics fell below the age-predicted norm in striking distractors, whereas fewer than 10% fell outside age-predicted norms in other task parameters. CONCLUSIONS: In children with tics (without comorbid ADHD), acting upon both targets and distractors suggests reduced ability to suppress responses to potential triggers for action. This may be related to increased sensorimotor noise or abnormal sensory gating.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8270726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82707262021-07-22 Inhibitory Control Deficits in Children with Tic Disorders Revealed by Object-Hit-and-Avoid Task Cothros, Nicholas Medina, Alex Martino, Davide Dukelow, Sean P. Hawe, Rachel L. Kirton, Adam Ganos, Christos Nosratmirshekarlou, Elaheh Pringsheim, Tamara Neural Plast Research Article BACKGROUND: Tic disorders may reflect impaired inhibitory control. This has been evaluated using different behavioural tasks, yielding mixed results. Our objective was to test inhibitory control in children with tics through simultaneous presentation of multiple, mobile stimuli. METHODS: Sixty-four children with tics (mean age 12.4 years; 7.5-18.5) were evaluated using a validated robotic bimanual exoskeleton protocol (Kinarm) in an object-hit-and-avoid task, in which target and distractor objects moved across a screen and participants aimed to hit only the targets while avoiding distractors. Performance was compared to 146 typically developing controls (mean age 13 years; 6.1-19.9). The primary outcome was the percentage of distractors struck. RESULTS: ANCOVA (age as covariate) showed participants struck significantly more distractors (participants without comorbid ADHD, 22.71% [SE 1.47]; participants with comorbid ADHD, 23.56% [1.47]; and controls, 15.59% [0.68]). Participants with comorbid ADHD struck significantly fewer targets (119.74 [2.77]) than controls, but no difference was found between participants without comorbid ADHD (122.66 [2.77]) and controls (127.00 [1.28]). Participants and controls did not differ significantly in movement speed and movement area. Just over 20% of participants with tics fell below the age-predicted norm in striking distractors, whereas fewer than 10% fell outside age-predicted norms in other task parameters. CONCLUSIONS: In children with tics (without comorbid ADHD), acting upon both targets and distractors suggests reduced ability to suppress responses to potential triggers for action. This may be related to increased sensorimotor noise or abnormal sensory gating. Hindawi 2021-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8270726/ /pubmed/34306065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8825091 Text en Copyright © 2021 Nicholas Cothros et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cothros, Nicholas
Medina, Alex
Martino, Davide
Dukelow, Sean P.
Hawe, Rachel L.
Kirton, Adam
Ganos, Christos
Nosratmirshekarlou, Elaheh
Pringsheim, Tamara
Inhibitory Control Deficits in Children with Tic Disorders Revealed by Object-Hit-and-Avoid Task
title Inhibitory Control Deficits in Children with Tic Disorders Revealed by Object-Hit-and-Avoid Task
title_full Inhibitory Control Deficits in Children with Tic Disorders Revealed by Object-Hit-and-Avoid Task
title_fullStr Inhibitory Control Deficits in Children with Tic Disorders Revealed by Object-Hit-and-Avoid Task
title_full_unstemmed Inhibitory Control Deficits in Children with Tic Disorders Revealed by Object-Hit-and-Avoid Task
title_short Inhibitory Control Deficits in Children with Tic Disorders Revealed by Object-Hit-and-Avoid Task
title_sort inhibitory control deficits in children with tic disorders revealed by object-hit-and-avoid task
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8270726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34306065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8825091
work_keys_str_mv AT cothrosnicholas inhibitorycontroldeficitsinchildrenwithticdisordersrevealedbyobjecthitandavoidtask
AT medinaalex inhibitorycontroldeficitsinchildrenwithticdisordersrevealedbyobjecthitandavoidtask
AT martinodavide inhibitorycontroldeficitsinchildrenwithticdisordersrevealedbyobjecthitandavoidtask
AT dukelowseanp inhibitorycontroldeficitsinchildrenwithticdisordersrevealedbyobjecthitandavoidtask
AT hawerachell inhibitorycontroldeficitsinchildrenwithticdisordersrevealedbyobjecthitandavoidtask
AT kirtonadam inhibitorycontroldeficitsinchildrenwithticdisordersrevealedbyobjecthitandavoidtask
AT ganoschristos inhibitorycontroldeficitsinchildrenwithticdisordersrevealedbyobjecthitandavoidtask
AT nosratmirshekarlouelaheh inhibitorycontroldeficitsinchildrenwithticdisordersrevealedbyobjecthitandavoidtask
AT pringsheimtamara inhibitorycontroldeficitsinchildrenwithticdisordersrevealedbyobjecthitandavoidtask