Cargando…
Estimated cumulative X-ray exposure and additional cancer risk during the evaluation and treatment of scoliosis in children and young people requiring surgery
INTRODUCTION: Clinicians and patients must weigh the benefits of radiological imaging against the risks of radiation exposure in the diagnosis and treatment of scoliosis. This report aims to estimate the cumulative absorbed and equivalent dose of radiation in patients undergoing surgical treatment f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8270816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33660241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43390-021-00314-6 |
_version_ | 1783720872698183680 |
---|---|
author | Loughenbury, P. R. Gentles, S. L. Murphy, E. J. Tomlinson, J. E. Borse, V. H. Dunsmuir, R. A. Gummerson, N. W. Millner, P. A. Rao, A. S. Rowbotham, E. Khan, A. L. |
author_facet | Loughenbury, P. R. Gentles, S. L. Murphy, E. J. Tomlinson, J. E. Borse, V. H. Dunsmuir, R. A. Gummerson, N. W. Millner, P. A. Rao, A. S. Rowbotham, E. Khan, A. L. |
author_sort | Loughenbury, P. R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Clinicians and patients must weigh the benefits of radiological imaging against the risks of radiation exposure in the diagnosis and treatment of scoliosis. This report aims to estimate the cumulative absorbed and equivalent dose of radiation in patients undergoing surgical treatment for scoliosis, and to present this as an estimated risk of cancer compared to background radiation levels. METHODS: Retrospective review of estimated absorbed dose on the Computerised Radiology Information System (CRIS(®)). Patients undergoing surgical correction of scoliosis (age ≤ 25) from August 2010 to August 2015 investigated. Estimated absorbed dose [milligrays (mGy)] recorded. Pedicle screws inserted using image intensification. Equivalent dose [millisieverts (mSv)] and additional cancer risk calculated from the National Research Council document ‘Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionising radiation’ (2006). RESULTS: 271 patients identified. Mean age 15 (range 2–25). Mean total absorbed dose 2136 mGy [standard deviation (SD) 1700 mGy]. Mean number of plain spine radiographs was 8 (SD 3) with total 1884 mGy exposure (SD 1609 mGy). Additional dose provided by CT (mean 0.17 episodes), plain chest and abdominal radiographs and image intensification. Mean number of image intensification episodes was 1.1 with mean estimated exposure 180 mGy (SD 238 mGy). Image intensification accounted for 8% of the estimated absorbed dose during treatment. Estimated mean effective dose delivered was 20.952 mSv equating to an additional cancer risk of 0.27–0.45%. CONCLUSION: Additional cancer risk from cumulative imaging is small and equivalent to approximately 8 years of natural background radiation. Use of image intensification for pedicle screw insertion is a minor contribution (8%) to the total patient dose. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8270816 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82708162021-07-20 Estimated cumulative X-ray exposure and additional cancer risk during the evaluation and treatment of scoliosis in children and young people requiring surgery Loughenbury, P. R. Gentles, S. L. Murphy, E. J. Tomlinson, J. E. Borse, V. H. Dunsmuir, R. A. Gummerson, N. W. Millner, P. A. Rao, A. S. Rowbotham, E. Khan, A. L. Spine Deform Case Series INTRODUCTION: Clinicians and patients must weigh the benefits of radiological imaging against the risks of radiation exposure in the diagnosis and treatment of scoliosis. This report aims to estimate the cumulative absorbed and equivalent dose of radiation in patients undergoing surgical treatment for scoliosis, and to present this as an estimated risk of cancer compared to background radiation levels. METHODS: Retrospective review of estimated absorbed dose on the Computerised Radiology Information System (CRIS(®)). Patients undergoing surgical correction of scoliosis (age ≤ 25) from August 2010 to August 2015 investigated. Estimated absorbed dose [milligrays (mGy)] recorded. Pedicle screws inserted using image intensification. Equivalent dose [millisieverts (mSv)] and additional cancer risk calculated from the National Research Council document ‘Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionising radiation’ (2006). RESULTS: 271 patients identified. Mean age 15 (range 2–25). Mean total absorbed dose 2136 mGy [standard deviation (SD) 1700 mGy]. Mean number of plain spine radiographs was 8 (SD 3) with total 1884 mGy exposure (SD 1609 mGy). Additional dose provided by CT (mean 0.17 episodes), plain chest and abdominal radiographs and image intensification. Mean number of image intensification episodes was 1.1 with mean estimated exposure 180 mGy (SD 238 mGy). Image intensification accounted for 8% of the estimated absorbed dose during treatment. Estimated mean effective dose delivered was 20.952 mSv equating to an additional cancer risk of 0.27–0.45%. CONCLUSION: Additional cancer risk from cumulative imaging is small and equivalent to approximately 8 years of natural background radiation. Use of image intensification for pedicle screw insertion is a minor contribution (8%) to the total patient dose. Springer International Publishing 2021-03-03 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8270816/ /pubmed/33660241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43390-021-00314-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Case Series Loughenbury, P. R. Gentles, S. L. Murphy, E. J. Tomlinson, J. E. Borse, V. H. Dunsmuir, R. A. Gummerson, N. W. Millner, P. A. Rao, A. S. Rowbotham, E. Khan, A. L. Estimated cumulative X-ray exposure and additional cancer risk during the evaluation and treatment of scoliosis in children and young people requiring surgery |
title | Estimated cumulative X-ray exposure and additional cancer risk during the evaluation and treatment of scoliosis in children and young people requiring surgery |
title_full | Estimated cumulative X-ray exposure and additional cancer risk during the evaluation and treatment of scoliosis in children and young people requiring surgery |
title_fullStr | Estimated cumulative X-ray exposure and additional cancer risk during the evaluation and treatment of scoliosis in children and young people requiring surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimated cumulative X-ray exposure and additional cancer risk during the evaluation and treatment of scoliosis in children and young people requiring surgery |
title_short | Estimated cumulative X-ray exposure and additional cancer risk during the evaluation and treatment of scoliosis in children and young people requiring surgery |
title_sort | estimated cumulative x-ray exposure and additional cancer risk during the evaluation and treatment of scoliosis in children and young people requiring surgery |
topic | Case Series |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8270816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33660241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43390-021-00314-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loughenburypr estimatedcumulativexrayexposureandadditionalcancerriskduringtheevaluationandtreatmentofscoliosisinchildrenandyoungpeoplerequiringsurgery AT gentlessl estimatedcumulativexrayexposureandadditionalcancerriskduringtheevaluationandtreatmentofscoliosisinchildrenandyoungpeoplerequiringsurgery AT murphyej estimatedcumulativexrayexposureandadditionalcancerriskduringtheevaluationandtreatmentofscoliosisinchildrenandyoungpeoplerequiringsurgery AT tomlinsonje estimatedcumulativexrayexposureandadditionalcancerriskduringtheevaluationandtreatmentofscoliosisinchildrenandyoungpeoplerequiringsurgery AT borsevh estimatedcumulativexrayexposureandadditionalcancerriskduringtheevaluationandtreatmentofscoliosisinchildrenandyoungpeoplerequiringsurgery AT dunsmuirra estimatedcumulativexrayexposureandadditionalcancerriskduringtheevaluationandtreatmentofscoliosisinchildrenandyoungpeoplerequiringsurgery AT gummersonnw estimatedcumulativexrayexposureandadditionalcancerriskduringtheevaluationandtreatmentofscoliosisinchildrenandyoungpeoplerequiringsurgery AT millnerpa estimatedcumulativexrayexposureandadditionalcancerriskduringtheevaluationandtreatmentofscoliosisinchildrenandyoungpeoplerequiringsurgery AT raoas estimatedcumulativexrayexposureandadditionalcancerriskduringtheevaluationandtreatmentofscoliosisinchildrenandyoungpeoplerequiringsurgery AT rowbothame estimatedcumulativexrayexposureandadditionalcancerriskduringtheevaluationandtreatmentofscoliosisinchildrenandyoungpeoplerequiringsurgery AT khanal estimatedcumulativexrayexposureandadditionalcancerriskduringtheevaluationandtreatmentofscoliosisinchildrenandyoungpeoplerequiringsurgery |