Cargando…

Reliability of the MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue) 2.0 knee score for different cartilage repair techniques—a retrospective observational study

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reliability of the MOCART 2.0 knee score in the radiological assessment of repair tissue after different cartilage repair procedures. METHODS: A total of 114 patients (34 females) who underwent cartilage repair of a femoral cartilage lesion with at least one postoperative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schreiner, Markus M., Raudner, Marcus, Röhrich, Sebastian, Zalaudek, Martin, Weber, Michael, Kaiser, Georg, Aldrian, Silke, Chiari, Catharina, Windhager, Reinhard, Trattnig, Siegfried
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8270819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33515088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07688-1
_version_ 1783720873388146688
author Schreiner, Markus M.
Raudner, Marcus
Röhrich, Sebastian
Zalaudek, Martin
Weber, Michael
Kaiser, Georg
Aldrian, Silke
Chiari, Catharina
Windhager, Reinhard
Trattnig, Siegfried
author_facet Schreiner, Markus M.
Raudner, Marcus
Röhrich, Sebastian
Zalaudek, Martin
Weber, Michael
Kaiser, Georg
Aldrian, Silke
Chiari, Catharina
Windhager, Reinhard
Trattnig, Siegfried
author_sort Schreiner, Markus M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reliability of the MOCART 2.0 knee score in the radiological assessment of repair tissue after different cartilage repair procedures. METHODS: A total of 114 patients (34 females) who underwent cartilage repair of a femoral cartilage lesion with at least one postoperative MRI examination were selected, and one random postoperative MRI examination was retrospectively included. Mean age was 32.5 ± 9.6 years at time of surgery. Overall, 66 chondral and 48 osteochondral lesions were included in the study. Forty-eight patients were treated with autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), 27 via osteochondral autologous transplantation, five using an osteochondral scaffold, and 34 underwent microfracture (MFX). The original MOCART and MOCART 2.0 knee scores were assessed by two independent readers. After a minimum 4-week interval, both readers performed a second reading of both scores. Inter- and intrarater reliabilities were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: The MOCART 2.0 knee score showed higher interrater reliability than the original MOCART score with an ICC of 0.875 versus 0.759, ranging from 0.863 in the MFX group to 0.878 in the ACI group. Intrarater reliability was good with an overall ICC of 0.860 and 0.866, respectively. Overall, interrater reliability was higher for osteochondral lesions than for chondral lesions, with ICCs of 0.906 versus 0.786. CONCLUSIONS: The MOCART 2.0 knee score enables the assessment of cartilage repair tissue after different cartilage repair techniques (ACI, osteochondral repair techniques, MFX), as well as for different lesion types with good intra- and interrater reliability. KEY POINTS: • The MOCART 2.0 knee score provides improved intra- and interrater reliability when compared to the original MOCART score. • The MOCART 2.0 knee score enables the assessment of cartilage repair tissue after different cartilage repair techniques (ACI, osteochondral repair techniques, MFX) with similarly good intra- and interrater reliability. • The assessment of osteochondral lesions demonstrated better intra- and interrater reliability than the assessment of chondral lesions in this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8270819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82708192021-07-20 Reliability of the MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue) 2.0 knee score for different cartilage repair techniques—a retrospective observational study Schreiner, Markus M. Raudner, Marcus Röhrich, Sebastian Zalaudek, Martin Weber, Michael Kaiser, Georg Aldrian, Silke Chiari, Catharina Windhager, Reinhard Trattnig, Siegfried Eur Radiol Musculoskeletal OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reliability of the MOCART 2.0 knee score in the radiological assessment of repair tissue after different cartilage repair procedures. METHODS: A total of 114 patients (34 females) who underwent cartilage repair of a femoral cartilage lesion with at least one postoperative MRI examination were selected, and one random postoperative MRI examination was retrospectively included. Mean age was 32.5 ± 9.6 years at time of surgery. Overall, 66 chondral and 48 osteochondral lesions were included in the study. Forty-eight patients were treated with autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), 27 via osteochondral autologous transplantation, five using an osteochondral scaffold, and 34 underwent microfracture (MFX). The original MOCART and MOCART 2.0 knee scores were assessed by two independent readers. After a minimum 4-week interval, both readers performed a second reading of both scores. Inter- and intrarater reliabilities were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: The MOCART 2.0 knee score showed higher interrater reliability than the original MOCART score with an ICC of 0.875 versus 0.759, ranging from 0.863 in the MFX group to 0.878 in the ACI group. Intrarater reliability was good with an overall ICC of 0.860 and 0.866, respectively. Overall, interrater reliability was higher for osteochondral lesions than for chondral lesions, with ICCs of 0.906 versus 0.786. CONCLUSIONS: The MOCART 2.0 knee score enables the assessment of cartilage repair tissue after different cartilage repair techniques (ACI, osteochondral repair techniques, MFX), as well as for different lesion types with good intra- and interrater reliability. KEY POINTS: • The MOCART 2.0 knee score provides improved intra- and interrater reliability when compared to the original MOCART score. • The MOCART 2.0 knee score enables the assessment of cartilage repair tissue after different cartilage repair techniques (ACI, osteochondral repair techniques, MFX) with similarly good intra- and interrater reliability. • The assessment of osteochondral lesions demonstrated better intra- and interrater reliability than the assessment of chondral lesions in this study. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-01-29 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8270819/ /pubmed/33515088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07688-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Musculoskeletal
Schreiner, Markus M.
Raudner, Marcus
Röhrich, Sebastian
Zalaudek, Martin
Weber, Michael
Kaiser, Georg
Aldrian, Silke
Chiari, Catharina
Windhager, Reinhard
Trattnig, Siegfried
Reliability of the MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue) 2.0 knee score for different cartilage repair techniques—a retrospective observational study
title Reliability of the MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue) 2.0 knee score for different cartilage repair techniques—a retrospective observational study
title_full Reliability of the MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue) 2.0 knee score for different cartilage repair techniques—a retrospective observational study
title_fullStr Reliability of the MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue) 2.0 knee score for different cartilage repair techniques—a retrospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of the MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue) 2.0 knee score for different cartilage repair techniques—a retrospective observational study
title_short Reliability of the MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue) 2.0 knee score for different cartilage repair techniques—a retrospective observational study
title_sort reliability of the mocart (magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue) 2.0 knee score for different cartilage repair techniques—a retrospective observational study
topic Musculoskeletal
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8270819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33515088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07688-1
work_keys_str_mv AT schreinermarkusm reliabilityofthemocartmagneticresonanceobservationofcartilagerepairtissue20kneescorefordifferentcartilagerepairtechniquesaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT raudnermarcus reliabilityofthemocartmagneticresonanceobservationofcartilagerepairtissue20kneescorefordifferentcartilagerepairtechniquesaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT rohrichsebastian reliabilityofthemocartmagneticresonanceobservationofcartilagerepairtissue20kneescorefordifferentcartilagerepairtechniquesaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT zalaudekmartin reliabilityofthemocartmagneticresonanceobservationofcartilagerepairtissue20kneescorefordifferentcartilagerepairtechniquesaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT webermichael reliabilityofthemocartmagneticresonanceobservationofcartilagerepairtissue20kneescorefordifferentcartilagerepairtechniquesaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT kaisergeorg reliabilityofthemocartmagneticresonanceobservationofcartilagerepairtissue20kneescorefordifferentcartilagerepairtechniquesaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT aldriansilke reliabilityofthemocartmagneticresonanceobservationofcartilagerepairtissue20kneescorefordifferentcartilagerepairtechniquesaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT chiaricatharina reliabilityofthemocartmagneticresonanceobservationofcartilagerepairtissue20kneescorefordifferentcartilagerepairtechniquesaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT windhagerreinhard reliabilityofthemocartmagneticresonanceobservationofcartilagerepairtissue20kneescorefordifferentcartilagerepairtechniquesaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT trattnigsiegfried reliabilityofthemocartmagneticresonanceobservationofcartilagerepairtissue20kneescorefordifferentcartilagerepairtechniquesaretrospectiveobservationalstudy