Cargando…

Health equity in Iran: A systematic review

Background: Health inequities are among debatable and challenging aspects of health systems. Achieving equity through social determinants of health approach has been mentioned in most upstream national plans and acts in Iran. This paper reports the findings of a systematic review of the current synt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghiasvand, Hesam, Mohamadi, Efat, Olyaeemanesh, Alireza, Kiani, Mohammad Mehdi, Armoon, Bahram, Takian, Amirhossein
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iran University of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8271272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34268239
http://dx.doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.35.51
_version_ 1783720964009230336
author Ghiasvand, Hesam
Mohamadi, Efat
Olyaeemanesh, Alireza
Kiani, Mohammad Mehdi
Armoon, Bahram
Takian, Amirhossein
author_facet Ghiasvand, Hesam
Mohamadi, Efat
Olyaeemanesh, Alireza
Kiani, Mohammad Mehdi
Armoon, Bahram
Takian, Amirhossein
author_sort Ghiasvand, Hesam
collection PubMed
description Background: Health inequities are among debatable and challenging aspects of health systems. Achieving equity through social determinants of health approach has been mentioned in most upstream national plans and acts in Iran. This paper reports the findings of a systematic review of the current synthesized evidence on health equity in Iran. Methods: This is a narrative systematic review. The relevant concepts and terminology in health equity was found through MeSH. We retrieved the relevant studies from PubMed/MedLine, Social Sciences Database, and Google Scholar in English, plus the Jihad University Database (SID), and Google Scholar in Farsi databases from 1979 until the end of January 2018. The retrieved evidence has been assessed primarily based on PICOS criteria and then Ottawa-Newcastle Scale, and CASP for qualitative studies. We used PRISMA flow diagram and a narrative approach for synthesizing the evidence. Results: We retrieved 172 455 studies. Following the primary and quality appraisal process, 114 studies were entered in the final phase of the analysis. The main part (approximately 95%) of the final phase included cross-sectional studies that had been analyzed through current descriptive inequality analysis indicators, analytical regression, or decomposition-based approaches. The studies were categorized within 3 main groups: health outcomes (40.3%), health utilization (32%), and health expenditures (27%). Conclusion: As a part of understanding the current situation of health equity in the policymakers’ need to refer the retrieved evidence in this study, they need more inputs specially regarding the social determinants of health approach. It seems that health equity research plan in Iran needs to be redirected in new paths that give appropriate weights to biological, gene-based, environmental and contextbased, economic, social, and political aspects of health as well. We advocate addressing the aspects of Social Determinant of Health (SDH) in analyzing health inequalities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8271272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Iran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82712722021-07-14 Health equity in Iran: A systematic review Ghiasvand, Hesam Mohamadi, Efat Olyaeemanesh, Alireza Kiani, Mohammad Mehdi Armoon, Bahram Takian, Amirhossein Med J Islam Repub Iran Systematic Review Article Background: Health inequities are among debatable and challenging aspects of health systems. Achieving equity through social determinants of health approach has been mentioned in most upstream national plans and acts in Iran. This paper reports the findings of a systematic review of the current synthesized evidence on health equity in Iran. Methods: This is a narrative systematic review. The relevant concepts and terminology in health equity was found through MeSH. We retrieved the relevant studies from PubMed/MedLine, Social Sciences Database, and Google Scholar in English, plus the Jihad University Database (SID), and Google Scholar in Farsi databases from 1979 until the end of January 2018. The retrieved evidence has been assessed primarily based on PICOS criteria and then Ottawa-Newcastle Scale, and CASP for qualitative studies. We used PRISMA flow diagram and a narrative approach for synthesizing the evidence. Results: We retrieved 172 455 studies. Following the primary and quality appraisal process, 114 studies were entered in the final phase of the analysis. The main part (approximately 95%) of the final phase included cross-sectional studies that had been analyzed through current descriptive inequality analysis indicators, analytical regression, or decomposition-based approaches. The studies were categorized within 3 main groups: health outcomes (40.3%), health utilization (32%), and health expenditures (27%). Conclusion: As a part of understanding the current situation of health equity in the policymakers’ need to refer the retrieved evidence in this study, they need more inputs specially regarding the social determinants of health approach. It seems that health equity research plan in Iran needs to be redirected in new paths that give appropriate weights to biological, gene-based, environmental and contextbased, economic, social, and political aspects of health as well. We advocate addressing the aspects of Social Determinant of Health (SDH) in analyzing health inequalities. Iran University of Medical Sciences 2021-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8271272/ /pubmed/34268239 http://dx.doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.35.51 Text en © 2021 Iran University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/1.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-ShareAlike 1.0 License (CC BY-NC-SA 1.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Systematic Review Article
Ghiasvand, Hesam
Mohamadi, Efat
Olyaeemanesh, Alireza
Kiani, Mohammad Mehdi
Armoon, Bahram
Takian, Amirhossein
Health equity in Iran: A systematic review
title Health equity in Iran: A systematic review
title_full Health equity in Iran: A systematic review
title_fullStr Health equity in Iran: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Health equity in Iran: A systematic review
title_short Health equity in Iran: A systematic review
title_sort health equity in iran: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8271272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34268239
http://dx.doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.35.51
work_keys_str_mv AT ghiasvandhesam healthequityiniranasystematicreview
AT mohamadiefat healthequityiniranasystematicreview
AT olyaeemaneshalireza healthequityiniranasystematicreview
AT kianimohammadmehdi healthequityiniranasystematicreview
AT armoonbahram healthequityiniranasystematicreview
AT takianamirhossein healthequityiniranasystematicreview