Cargando…
Volatile Versus Intravenous Anesthetics in Cardiac Anesthesia: a Narrative Review
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: The present review addresses clinicians and gives an overview about the experimental rationale for pharmacological conditioning associated with volatile anesthetics, opioids, and propofol; the current clinical data; and the technical considerations regarding the clinical routi...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8271298/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34276252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40140-021-00466-1 |
_version_ | 1783720969478602752 |
---|---|
author | Uhlig, Christopher Labus, Jakob |
author_facet | Uhlig, Christopher Labus, Jakob |
author_sort | Uhlig, Christopher |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: The present review addresses clinicians and gives an overview about the experimental rationale for pharmacological conditioning associated with volatile anesthetics, opioids, and propofol; the current clinical data; and the technical considerations regarding the clinical routine in cardiac anesthesia. RECENT FINDINGS: Volatile anesthetics have been standard of care for general anesthesia for cardiac surgery, especially while using cardiopulmonary bypass. The 2019 published MYRIAD trial was not able to show a difference in mortality or cardiac biomarkers for volatile anesthetics compared to total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), raising the question of equivalence with respect to patient outcome. SUMMARY: Reviewing the literature, the scientific foundation for the belief of clinically relevant conditioning by uninterrupted administration of a volatile anesthetic is weak. TIVA can also be performed safely in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8271298 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82712982021-07-12 Volatile Versus Intravenous Anesthetics in Cardiac Anesthesia: a Narrative Review Uhlig, Christopher Labus, Jakob Curr Anesthesiol Rep Cardiovascular Anesthesia (J Fassl, Section Editor) PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: The present review addresses clinicians and gives an overview about the experimental rationale for pharmacological conditioning associated with volatile anesthetics, opioids, and propofol; the current clinical data; and the technical considerations regarding the clinical routine in cardiac anesthesia. RECENT FINDINGS: Volatile anesthetics have been standard of care for general anesthesia for cardiac surgery, especially while using cardiopulmonary bypass. The 2019 published MYRIAD trial was not able to show a difference in mortality or cardiac biomarkers for volatile anesthetics compared to total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), raising the question of equivalence with respect to patient outcome. SUMMARY: Reviewing the literature, the scientific foundation for the belief of clinically relevant conditioning by uninterrupted administration of a volatile anesthetic is weak. TIVA can also be performed safely in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Springer US 2021-07-10 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8271298/ /pubmed/34276252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40140-021-00466-1 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Anesthesia (J Fassl, Section Editor) Uhlig, Christopher Labus, Jakob Volatile Versus Intravenous Anesthetics in Cardiac Anesthesia: a Narrative Review |
title | Volatile Versus Intravenous Anesthetics in Cardiac Anesthesia: a Narrative Review |
title_full | Volatile Versus Intravenous Anesthetics in Cardiac Anesthesia: a Narrative Review |
title_fullStr | Volatile Versus Intravenous Anesthetics in Cardiac Anesthesia: a Narrative Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Volatile Versus Intravenous Anesthetics in Cardiac Anesthesia: a Narrative Review |
title_short | Volatile Versus Intravenous Anesthetics in Cardiac Anesthesia: a Narrative Review |
title_sort | volatile versus intravenous anesthetics in cardiac anesthesia: a narrative review |
topic | Cardiovascular Anesthesia (J Fassl, Section Editor) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8271298/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34276252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40140-021-00466-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT uhligchristopher volatileversusintravenousanestheticsincardiacanesthesiaanarrativereview AT labusjakob volatileversusintravenousanestheticsincardiacanesthesiaanarrativereview |