Cargando…

Volatile Versus Intravenous Anesthetics in Cardiac Anesthesia: a Narrative Review

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: The present review addresses clinicians and gives an overview about the experimental rationale for pharmacological conditioning associated with volatile anesthetics, opioids, and propofol; the current clinical data; and the technical considerations regarding the clinical routi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uhlig, Christopher, Labus, Jakob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8271298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34276252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40140-021-00466-1
_version_ 1783720969478602752
author Uhlig, Christopher
Labus, Jakob
author_facet Uhlig, Christopher
Labus, Jakob
author_sort Uhlig, Christopher
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: The present review addresses clinicians and gives an overview about the experimental rationale for pharmacological conditioning associated with volatile anesthetics, opioids, and propofol; the current clinical data; and the technical considerations regarding the clinical routine in cardiac anesthesia. RECENT FINDINGS: Volatile anesthetics have been standard of care for general anesthesia for cardiac surgery, especially while using cardiopulmonary bypass. The 2019 published MYRIAD trial was not able to show a difference in mortality or cardiac biomarkers for volatile anesthetics compared to total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), raising the question of equivalence with respect to patient outcome. SUMMARY: Reviewing the literature, the scientific foundation for the belief of clinically relevant conditioning by uninterrupted administration of a volatile anesthetic is weak. TIVA can also be performed safely in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8271298
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82712982021-07-12 Volatile Versus Intravenous Anesthetics in Cardiac Anesthesia: a Narrative Review Uhlig, Christopher Labus, Jakob Curr Anesthesiol Rep Cardiovascular Anesthesia (J Fassl, Section Editor) PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: The present review addresses clinicians and gives an overview about the experimental rationale for pharmacological conditioning associated with volatile anesthetics, opioids, and propofol; the current clinical data; and the technical considerations regarding the clinical routine in cardiac anesthesia. RECENT FINDINGS: Volatile anesthetics have been standard of care for general anesthesia for cardiac surgery, especially while using cardiopulmonary bypass. The 2019 published MYRIAD trial was not able to show a difference in mortality or cardiac biomarkers for volatile anesthetics compared to total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), raising the question of equivalence with respect to patient outcome. SUMMARY: Reviewing the literature, the scientific foundation for the belief of clinically relevant conditioning by uninterrupted administration of a volatile anesthetic is weak. TIVA can also be performed safely in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Springer US 2021-07-10 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8271298/ /pubmed/34276252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40140-021-00466-1 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Anesthesia (J Fassl, Section Editor)
Uhlig, Christopher
Labus, Jakob
Volatile Versus Intravenous Anesthetics in Cardiac Anesthesia: a Narrative Review
title Volatile Versus Intravenous Anesthetics in Cardiac Anesthesia: a Narrative Review
title_full Volatile Versus Intravenous Anesthetics in Cardiac Anesthesia: a Narrative Review
title_fullStr Volatile Versus Intravenous Anesthetics in Cardiac Anesthesia: a Narrative Review
title_full_unstemmed Volatile Versus Intravenous Anesthetics in Cardiac Anesthesia: a Narrative Review
title_short Volatile Versus Intravenous Anesthetics in Cardiac Anesthesia: a Narrative Review
title_sort volatile versus intravenous anesthetics in cardiac anesthesia: a narrative review
topic Cardiovascular Anesthesia (J Fassl, Section Editor)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8271298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34276252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40140-021-00466-1
work_keys_str_mv AT uhligchristopher volatileversusintravenousanestheticsincardiacanesthesiaanarrativereview
AT labusjakob volatileversusintravenousanestheticsincardiacanesthesiaanarrativereview