Cargando…
Evaluation of Electric Field Integral Voltage Measurement Method of Transmission Line Based on Error Transmission and Uncertainty Analysis
Electric field numerical integration algorithms can realize the non-contact measurement of transmission line voltage effectively. Although there are many electric field numerical integration algorithms, lack of a comprehensive comparison of accuracy and stability among various algorithms results in...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8271448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34201966 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21134340 |
_version_ | 1783721004692930560 |
---|---|
author | Fan, Jiarui Ai, Cheng Guo, Aofei Yan, Xiaojun Wang, Jingang |
author_facet | Fan, Jiarui Ai, Cheng Guo, Aofei Yan, Xiaojun Wang, Jingang |
author_sort | Fan, Jiarui |
collection | PubMed |
description | Electric field numerical integration algorithms can realize the non-contact measurement of transmission line voltage effectively. Although there are many electric field numerical integration algorithms, lack of a comprehensive comparison of accuracy and stability among various algorithms results in difficulties in evaluating the measurement results of various algorithms. Therefore, this paper presents the G-L (Gauss–Legendre) algorithm, the I-G-L (improved Gauss–Legendre) algorithm, and the I-G-C (improved Gauss–Chebyshev) algorithm and proposes a unified error propagation model of the derived algorithms to assess the accuracy of each integration method by considering multiple error sources. Moreover, evaluation criteria for the uncertainty of transmission line voltage measurement are proposed to analyze the stability and reliability of these algorithms. A simulation model and experiment platform were then constructed to conduct error propagation and uncertainty analyses. The results show that the G-L algorithm had the highest accuracy and stability in the scheme with five integral nodes, for which the simulation error was 0.603% and the relative uncertainty was 2.130%. The I-G-L algorithm was more applicable due to the smaller number of integral nodes required, yet the algorithm was less stable in achieving the same accuracy as the G-L algorithm. In addition, the I-G-C algorithm was relatively less accurate and stable in voltage measurement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8271448 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82714482021-07-11 Evaluation of Electric Field Integral Voltage Measurement Method of Transmission Line Based on Error Transmission and Uncertainty Analysis Fan, Jiarui Ai, Cheng Guo, Aofei Yan, Xiaojun Wang, Jingang Sensors (Basel) Article Electric field numerical integration algorithms can realize the non-contact measurement of transmission line voltage effectively. Although there are many electric field numerical integration algorithms, lack of a comprehensive comparison of accuracy and stability among various algorithms results in difficulties in evaluating the measurement results of various algorithms. Therefore, this paper presents the G-L (Gauss–Legendre) algorithm, the I-G-L (improved Gauss–Legendre) algorithm, and the I-G-C (improved Gauss–Chebyshev) algorithm and proposes a unified error propagation model of the derived algorithms to assess the accuracy of each integration method by considering multiple error sources. Moreover, evaluation criteria for the uncertainty of transmission line voltage measurement are proposed to analyze the stability and reliability of these algorithms. A simulation model and experiment platform were then constructed to conduct error propagation and uncertainty analyses. The results show that the G-L algorithm had the highest accuracy and stability in the scheme with five integral nodes, for which the simulation error was 0.603% and the relative uncertainty was 2.130%. The I-G-L algorithm was more applicable due to the smaller number of integral nodes required, yet the algorithm was less stable in achieving the same accuracy as the G-L algorithm. In addition, the I-G-C algorithm was relatively less accurate and stable in voltage measurement. MDPI 2021-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8271448/ /pubmed/34201966 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21134340 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Fan, Jiarui Ai, Cheng Guo, Aofei Yan, Xiaojun Wang, Jingang Evaluation of Electric Field Integral Voltage Measurement Method of Transmission Line Based on Error Transmission and Uncertainty Analysis |
title | Evaluation of Electric Field Integral Voltage Measurement Method of Transmission Line Based on Error Transmission and Uncertainty Analysis |
title_full | Evaluation of Electric Field Integral Voltage Measurement Method of Transmission Line Based on Error Transmission and Uncertainty Analysis |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Electric Field Integral Voltage Measurement Method of Transmission Line Based on Error Transmission and Uncertainty Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Electric Field Integral Voltage Measurement Method of Transmission Line Based on Error Transmission and Uncertainty Analysis |
title_short | Evaluation of Electric Field Integral Voltage Measurement Method of Transmission Line Based on Error Transmission and Uncertainty Analysis |
title_sort | evaluation of electric field integral voltage measurement method of transmission line based on error transmission and uncertainty analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8271448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34201966 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21134340 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fanjiarui evaluationofelectricfieldintegralvoltagemeasurementmethodoftransmissionlinebasedonerrortransmissionanduncertaintyanalysis AT aicheng evaluationofelectricfieldintegralvoltagemeasurementmethodoftransmissionlinebasedonerrortransmissionanduncertaintyanalysis AT guoaofei evaluationofelectricfieldintegralvoltagemeasurementmethodoftransmissionlinebasedonerrortransmissionanduncertaintyanalysis AT yanxiaojun evaluationofelectricfieldintegralvoltagemeasurementmethodoftransmissionlinebasedonerrortransmissionanduncertaintyanalysis AT wangjingang evaluationofelectricfieldintegralvoltagemeasurementmethodoftransmissionlinebasedonerrortransmissionanduncertaintyanalysis |