Cargando…

Evaluation of Electric Field Integral Voltage Measurement Method of Transmission Line Based on Error Transmission and Uncertainty Analysis

Electric field numerical integration algorithms can realize the non-contact measurement of transmission line voltage effectively. Although there are many electric field numerical integration algorithms, lack of a comprehensive comparison of accuracy and stability among various algorithms results in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fan, Jiarui, Ai, Cheng, Guo, Aofei, Yan, Xiaojun, Wang, Jingang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8271448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34201966
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21134340
_version_ 1783721004692930560
author Fan, Jiarui
Ai, Cheng
Guo, Aofei
Yan, Xiaojun
Wang, Jingang
author_facet Fan, Jiarui
Ai, Cheng
Guo, Aofei
Yan, Xiaojun
Wang, Jingang
author_sort Fan, Jiarui
collection PubMed
description Electric field numerical integration algorithms can realize the non-contact measurement of transmission line voltage effectively. Although there are many electric field numerical integration algorithms, lack of a comprehensive comparison of accuracy and stability among various algorithms results in difficulties in evaluating the measurement results of various algorithms. Therefore, this paper presents the G-L (Gauss–Legendre) algorithm, the I-G-L (improved Gauss–Legendre) algorithm, and the I-G-C (improved Gauss–Chebyshev) algorithm and proposes a unified error propagation model of the derived algorithms to assess the accuracy of each integration method by considering multiple error sources. Moreover, evaluation criteria for the uncertainty of transmission line voltage measurement are proposed to analyze the stability and reliability of these algorithms. A simulation model and experiment platform were then constructed to conduct error propagation and uncertainty analyses. The results show that the G-L algorithm had the highest accuracy and stability in the scheme with five integral nodes, for which the simulation error was 0.603% and the relative uncertainty was 2.130%. The I-G-L algorithm was more applicable due to the smaller number of integral nodes required, yet the algorithm was less stable in achieving the same accuracy as the G-L algorithm. In addition, the I-G-C algorithm was relatively less accurate and stable in voltage measurement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8271448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82714482021-07-11 Evaluation of Electric Field Integral Voltage Measurement Method of Transmission Line Based on Error Transmission and Uncertainty Analysis Fan, Jiarui Ai, Cheng Guo, Aofei Yan, Xiaojun Wang, Jingang Sensors (Basel) Article Electric field numerical integration algorithms can realize the non-contact measurement of transmission line voltage effectively. Although there are many electric field numerical integration algorithms, lack of a comprehensive comparison of accuracy and stability among various algorithms results in difficulties in evaluating the measurement results of various algorithms. Therefore, this paper presents the G-L (Gauss–Legendre) algorithm, the I-G-L (improved Gauss–Legendre) algorithm, and the I-G-C (improved Gauss–Chebyshev) algorithm and proposes a unified error propagation model of the derived algorithms to assess the accuracy of each integration method by considering multiple error sources. Moreover, evaluation criteria for the uncertainty of transmission line voltage measurement are proposed to analyze the stability and reliability of these algorithms. A simulation model and experiment platform were then constructed to conduct error propagation and uncertainty analyses. The results show that the G-L algorithm had the highest accuracy and stability in the scheme with five integral nodes, for which the simulation error was 0.603% and the relative uncertainty was 2.130%. The I-G-L algorithm was more applicable due to the smaller number of integral nodes required, yet the algorithm was less stable in achieving the same accuracy as the G-L algorithm. In addition, the I-G-C algorithm was relatively less accurate and stable in voltage measurement. MDPI 2021-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8271448/ /pubmed/34201966 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21134340 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fan, Jiarui
Ai, Cheng
Guo, Aofei
Yan, Xiaojun
Wang, Jingang
Evaluation of Electric Field Integral Voltage Measurement Method of Transmission Line Based on Error Transmission and Uncertainty Analysis
title Evaluation of Electric Field Integral Voltage Measurement Method of Transmission Line Based on Error Transmission and Uncertainty Analysis
title_full Evaluation of Electric Field Integral Voltage Measurement Method of Transmission Line Based on Error Transmission and Uncertainty Analysis
title_fullStr Evaluation of Electric Field Integral Voltage Measurement Method of Transmission Line Based on Error Transmission and Uncertainty Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Electric Field Integral Voltage Measurement Method of Transmission Line Based on Error Transmission and Uncertainty Analysis
title_short Evaluation of Electric Field Integral Voltage Measurement Method of Transmission Line Based on Error Transmission and Uncertainty Analysis
title_sort evaluation of electric field integral voltage measurement method of transmission line based on error transmission and uncertainty analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8271448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34201966
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21134340
work_keys_str_mv AT fanjiarui evaluationofelectricfieldintegralvoltagemeasurementmethodoftransmissionlinebasedonerrortransmissionanduncertaintyanalysis
AT aicheng evaluationofelectricfieldintegralvoltagemeasurementmethodoftransmissionlinebasedonerrortransmissionanduncertaintyanalysis
AT guoaofei evaluationofelectricfieldintegralvoltagemeasurementmethodoftransmissionlinebasedonerrortransmissionanduncertaintyanalysis
AT yanxiaojun evaluationofelectricfieldintegralvoltagemeasurementmethodoftransmissionlinebasedonerrortransmissionanduncertaintyanalysis
AT wangjingang evaluationofelectricfieldintegralvoltagemeasurementmethodoftransmissionlinebasedonerrortransmissionanduncertaintyanalysis