Comparative Study of Damping on Pultruded GFRP and Steel Beams

The use of glass fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP) composites in civil engineering structures has seen considerable growth in recent years due to their high strength, low self-weight, and corrosion resistance, namely when compared to traditional materials, such as steel and reinforced concrete. To enable the structural use of GFRP composite materials in civil engineering applications, especially in footbridges, it is necessary to gather knowledge on their structural behaviour, particularly under dynamic loads, and to evaluate the ability of current design tools to predict their response. In fact, excessive vibration has a major influence on the in-service performance (comfort) of slender structures as well on their service life. The use of composite materials that combine high damping capacity with relatively high stiffness and low mass can provide functional and economic benefits, especially for footbridges. This paper aims to investigate the dynamic behaviour of GFRP free-supported beams to evaluate their modal characteristics (frequency, damping, and modal shape). To assess the benefits of using a structure made of pultruded GFRP rather than a conventional material—steel, a comparative analysis between the dynamic characteristics of GFRP and steel beams is performed. To specifically address material damping and to minimize the interference of the boundary conditions, the beams are tested in a free condition, resting on a low-density foam base. The results show that the damping capacity of GFRP is much higher than that of steel, as the measured damping factor of GFRP is five times higher than that of steel for the same boundary conditions and similar geometry. Furthermore, the fact that the frequencies of the tested specimens resemble for the two different materials highlights the perceived damping qualities of the polymer-based composite material. Finally, an energy method for evaluating the influence of the scale factor on material damping is applied, which made it possible to infer that the damping varies as a function of frequency but is not explicitly affected by the length of the specimens.