Cargando…
Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study
BACKGROUND: The oncological outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) and open gastrectomy (OG) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy have been investigated in a few studies. Our purpose was to evaluate the oncological outcomes of LG and OG after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanc...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8272390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34243773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02322-2 |
_version_ | 1783721208373575680 |
---|---|
author | Khaled, Islam Priego, Pablo Soliman, Hany Faisal, Mohammed Saad Ahmed, Ihab |
author_facet | Khaled, Islam Priego, Pablo Soliman, Hany Faisal, Mohammed Saad Ahmed, Ihab |
author_sort | Khaled, Islam |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The oncological outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) and open gastrectomy (OG) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy have been investigated in a few studies. Our purpose was to evaluate the oncological outcomes of LG and OG after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) and to determine the advantages, preferences, and ease of use of the two techniques after chemotherapy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent either OG (n = 43) or LG (n = 41). The neoadjuvant treatment regimen consisted of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin for three cycles, which was then repeated 6 to 12 weeks after the operation for four cycles. RESULTS: The hospital stay time and intraoperative blood loss in the LG group were significantly lower than those in the OG group. The mortality rate and the 3-year survival rate for patients in the LG group were comparable to those of patients in the OG group (4.6% vs. 9.7% and 68.3% vs. 58.1%, respectively). Similar trends were observed regarding the 3-year recurrence rate and metastasis. The mean survival time was 52.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 44.2–61.6) in the OG group compared with 43.3 (95% CI, 36.6–49.8) in the LG group. Likewise, the mean disease-free survival was 56.1 months (95% CI, 46.36–65.8) in the LG group compared with 50.9 months (95% CI, 44.6–57.2) in the OG group. CONCLUSION: LG is a feasible and safe alternative to OG for patients with locally advanced GC receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-021-02322-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8272390 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82723902021-07-12 Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study Khaled, Islam Priego, Pablo Soliman, Hany Faisal, Mohammed Saad Ahmed, Ihab World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The oncological outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) and open gastrectomy (OG) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy have been investigated in a few studies. Our purpose was to evaluate the oncological outcomes of LG and OG after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) and to determine the advantages, preferences, and ease of use of the two techniques after chemotherapy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent either OG (n = 43) or LG (n = 41). The neoadjuvant treatment regimen consisted of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin for three cycles, which was then repeated 6 to 12 weeks after the operation for four cycles. RESULTS: The hospital stay time and intraoperative blood loss in the LG group were significantly lower than those in the OG group. The mortality rate and the 3-year survival rate for patients in the LG group were comparable to those of patients in the OG group (4.6% vs. 9.7% and 68.3% vs. 58.1%, respectively). Similar trends were observed regarding the 3-year recurrence rate and metastasis. The mean survival time was 52.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 44.2–61.6) in the OG group compared with 43.3 (95% CI, 36.6–49.8) in the LG group. Likewise, the mean disease-free survival was 56.1 months (95% CI, 46.36–65.8) in the LG group compared with 50.9 months (95% CI, 44.6–57.2) in the OG group. CONCLUSION: LG is a feasible and safe alternative to OG for patients with locally advanced GC receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-021-02322-2. BioMed Central 2021-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8272390/ /pubmed/34243773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02322-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Khaled, Islam Priego, Pablo Soliman, Hany Faisal, Mohammed Saad Ahmed, Ihab Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study |
title | Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study |
title_full | Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study |
title_fullStr | Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study |
title_full_unstemmed | Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study |
title_short | Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study |
title_sort | oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8272390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34243773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02322-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khaledislam oncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopengastrectomyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceraretrospectivemulticenterstudy AT priegopablo oncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopengastrectomyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceraretrospectivemulticenterstudy AT solimanhany oncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopengastrectomyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceraretrospectivemulticenterstudy AT faisalmohammed oncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopengastrectomyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceraretrospectivemulticenterstudy AT saadahmedihab oncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopengastrectomyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceraretrospectivemulticenterstudy |