Cargando…

Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND: The oncological outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) and open gastrectomy (OG) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy have been investigated in a few studies. Our purpose was to evaluate the oncological outcomes of LG and OG after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khaled, Islam, Priego, Pablo, Soliman, Hany, Faisal, Mohammed, Saad Ahmed, Ihab
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8272390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34243773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02322-2
_version_ 1783721208373575680
author Khaled, Islam
Priego, Pablo
Soliman, Hany
Faisal, Mohammed
Saad Ahmed, Ihab
author_facet Khaled, Islam
Priego, Pablo
Soliman, Hany
Faisal, Mohammed
Saad Ahmed, Ihab
author_sort Khaled, Islam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The oncological outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) and open gastrectomy (OG) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy have been investigated in a few studies. Our purpose was to evaluate the oncological outcomes of LG and OG after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) and to determine the advantages, preferences, and ease of use of the two techniques after chemotherapy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent either OG (n = 43) or LG (n = 41). The neoadjuvant treatment regimen consisted of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin for three cycles, which was then repeated 6 to 12 weeks after the operation for four cycles. RESULTS: The hospital stay time and intraoperative blood loss in the LG group were significantly lower than those in the OG group. The mortality rate and the 3-year survival rate for patients in the LG group were comparable to those of patients in the OG group (4.6% vs. 9.7% and 68.3% vs. 58.1%, respectively). Similar trends were observed regarding the 3-year recurrence rate and metastasis. The mean survival time was 52.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 44.2–61.6) in the OG group compared with 43.3 (95% CI, 36.6–49.8) in the LG group. Likewise, the mean disease-free survival was 56.1 months (95% CI, 46.36–65.8) in the LG group compared with 50.9 months (95% CI, 44.6–57.2) in the OG group. CONCLUSION: LG is a feasible and safe alternative to OG for patients with locally advanced GC receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-021-02322-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8272390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82723902021-07-12 Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study Khaled, Islam Priego, Pablo Soliman, Hany Faisal, Mohammed Saad Ahmed, Ihab World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The oncological outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) and open gastrectomy (OG) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy have been investigated in a few studies. Our purpose was to evaluate the oncological outcomes of LG and OG after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) and to determine the advantages, preferences, and ease of use of the two techniques after chemotherapy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent either OG (n = 43) or LG (n = 41). The neoadjuvant treatment regimen consisted of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin for three cycles, which was then repeated 6 to 12 weeks after the operation for four cycles. RESULTS: The hospital stay time and intraoperative blood loss in the LG group were significantly lower than those in the OG group. The mortality rate and the 3-year survival rate for patients in the LG group were comparable to those of patients in the OG group (4.6% vs. 9.7% and 68.3% vs. 58.1%, respectively). Similar trends were observed regarding the 3-year recurrence rate and metastasis. The mean survival time was 52.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 44.2–61.6) in the OG group compared with 43.3 (95% CI, 36.6–49.8) in the LG group. Likewise, the mean disease-free survival was 56.1 months (95% CI, 46.36–65.8) in the LG group compared with 50.9 months (95% CI, 44.6–57.2) in the OG group. CONCLUSION: LG is a feasible and safe alternative to OG for patients with locally advanced GC receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-021-02322-2. BioMed Central 2021-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8272390/ /pubmed/34243773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02322-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Khaled, Islam
Priego, Pablo
Soliman, Hany
Faisal, Mohammed
Saad Ahmed, Ihab
Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study
title Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study
title_full Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study
title_fullStr Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study
title_full_unstemmed Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study
title_short Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study
title_sort oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8272390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34243773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02322-2
work_keys_str_mv AT khaledislam oncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopengastrectomyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceraretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT priegopablo oncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopengastrectomyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceraretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT solimanhany oncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopengastrectomyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceraretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT faisalmohammed oncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopengastrectomyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceraretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT saadahmedihab oncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopengastrectomyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceraretrospectivemulticenterstudy