Cargando…

Independent Risk Factors of Postoperative Lymphatic Leakage in Patients with Gynecological Malignant Tumor: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND: We aimed this investigation to screen and analyze the risk factors of postoperative lymphatic leakage of gynecological malignant tumors that contribute to the treatment of the diseases. MATERIAL/METHODS: According to the occurrence of lymphatic leakage after an operation, 655 patients wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Du, Min, Wang, Lei, Zhao, Liyun, Huang, Wei, Fang, Xiaoling, Xia, Xiaomeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8272396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34226438
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.932678
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: We aimed this investigation to screen and analyze the risk factors of postoperative lymphatic leakage of gynecological malignant tumors that contribute to the treatment of the diseases. MATERIAL/METHODS: According to the occurrence of lymphatic leakage after an operation, 655 patients with pelvic lymph node and/or abdominal para-aortic lymph node dissection for gynecological malignant tumor were retrospectively analyzed and divided into a case group and a control group. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to screen the effective independent risk factors and establish a clinical prediction model. The differentiation and calibration of the clinical prediction model were evaluated, and we performed internal and external validation of the model with 207 cases. RESULTS: The surgeons, the number of removed lymph nodes, the field and range of lymph nodes to be removed, the method of drainage, and postoperative infection are the independent risk factors of lymphatic leakage after lymph node dissection for gynecological malignant tumors. The area under the ROC curve of the clinical prediction model was 0.839 (P<0.001), the calibration Hosmer-Lemeshow test shows χ(2)=4.381, P=0.821. Through 10-fold cross-validation, the average correct rate of the prediction model was 0.899, the area under the ROC curve of the external verification group was 0.741, and the calibration Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed χ(2)=12.728, P=0.122. CONCLUSIONS: The new logistic prediction model showed a good degree of differentiation and calibration in both the modeling and verification groups, and it can be used for early warning of the occurrence of lymphatic leakage after lymph node dissection.