Cargando…

Reproductive resilience but not root architecture underpins yield improvement under drought in maize

Because plants capture water and nutrients through roots, it was proposed that changes in root systems architecture (RSA) might underpin the 3-fold increase in maize (Zea mays L.) grain yield over the last century. Here we show that both RSA and yield have changed with decades of maize breeding, but...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Messina, Carlos, McDonald, Dan, Poffenbarger, Hanna, Clark, Randy, Salinas, Andrea, Fang, Yinan, Gho, Carla, Tang, Tom, Graham, Geoff, Hammer, Graeme L, Cooper, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8272564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34037765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab231
_version_ 1783721246230315008
author Messina, Carlos
McDonald, Dan
Poffenbarger, Hanna
Clark, Randy
Salinas, Andrea
Fang, Yinan
Gho, Carla
Tang, Tom
Graham, Geoff
Hammer, Graeme L
Cooper, Mark
author_facet Messina, Carlos
McDonald, Dan
Poffenbarger, Hanna
Clark, Randy
Salinas, Andrea
Fang, Yinan
Gho, Carla
Tang, Tom
Graham, Geoff
Hammer, Graeme L
Cooper, Mark
author_sort Messina, Carlos
collection PubMed
description Because plants capture water and nutrients through roots, it was proposed that changes in root systems architecture (RSA) might underpin the 3-fold increase in maize (Zea mays L.) grain yield over the last century. Here we show that both RSA and yield have changed with decades of maize breeding, but not the crop water uptake. Results from X-ray phenotyping in controlled environments showed that single cross (SX) hybrids have smaller root systems than double cross (DX) hybrids for root diameters between 2465 µm and 181µm (P<0.05). Soil water extraction measured under field conditions ranged between 2.6 mm d(–1) and 2.9 mm d(–1) but were not significantly different between SX and DX hybrids. Yield and yield components were higher for SX than DX hybrids across densities and irrigation (P<0.001). Taken together, the results suggest that changes in RSA were not the cause of increased water uptake but an adaptation to high-density stands used in modern agriculture. This adaptation may have contributed to shift in resource allocation to the ear and indirectly improved reproductive resilience. Advances in root physiology and phenotyping can create opportunities to maintain long-term genetic gain in maize, but a shift from ideotype to crop and production system thinking will be required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8272564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82725642021-07-12 Reproductive resilience but not root architecture underpins yield improvement under drought in maize Messina, Carlos McDonald, Dan Poffenbarger, Hanna Clark, Randy Salinas, Andrea Fang, Yinan Gho, Carla Tang, Tom Graham, Geoff Hammer, Graeme L Cooper, Mark J Exp Bot eXtra Botany Because plants capture water and nutrients through roots, it was proposed that changes in root systems architecture (RSA) might underpin the 3-fold increase in maize (Zea mays L.) grain yield over the last century. Here we show that both RSA and yield have changed with decades of maize breeding, but not the crop water uptake. Results from X-ray phenotyping in controlled environments showed that single cross (SX) hybrids have smaller root systems than double cross (DX) hybrids for root diameters between 2465 µm and 181µm (P<0.05). Soil water extraction measured under field conditions ranged between 2.6 mm d(–1) and 2.9 mm d(–1) but were not significantly different between SX and DX hybrids. Yield and yield components were higher for SX than DX hybrids across densities and irrigation (P<0.001). Taken together, the results suggest that changes in RSA were not the cause of increased water uptake but an adaptation to high-density stands used in modern agriculture. This adaptation may have contributed to shift in resource allocation to the ear and indirectly improved reproductive resilience. Advances in root physiology and phenotyping can create opportunities to maintain long-term genetic gain in maize, but a shift from ideotype to crop and production system thinking will be required. Oxford University Press 2021-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8272564/ /pubmed/34037765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab231 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle eXtra Botany
Messina, Carlos
McDonald, Dan
Poffenbarger, Hanna
Clark, Randy
Salinas, Andrea
Fang, Yinan
Gho, Carla
Tang, Tom
Graham, Geoff
Hammer, Graeme L
Cooper, Mark
Reproductive resilience but not root architecture underpins yield improvement under drought in maize
title Reproductive resilience but not root architecture underpins yield improvement under drought in maize
title_full Reproductive resilience but not root architecture underpins yield improvement under drought in maize
title_fullStr Reproductive resilience but not root architecture underpins yield improvement under drought in maize
title_full_unstemmed Reproductive resilience but not root architecture underpins yield improvement under drought in maize
title_short Reproductive resilience but not root architecture underpins yield improvement under drought in maize
title_sort reproductive resilience but not root architecture underpins yield improvement under drought in maize
topic eXtra Botany
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8272564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34037765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab231
work_keys_str_mv AT messinacarlos reproductiveresiliencebutnotrootarchitectureunderpinsyieldimprovementunderdroughtinmaize
AT mcdonalddan reproductiveresiliencebutnotrootarchitectureunderpinsyieldimprovementunderdroughtinmaize
AT poffenbargerhanna reproductiveresiliencebutnotrootarchitectureunderpinsyieldimprovementunderdroughtinmaize
AT clarkrandy reproductiveresiliencebutnotrootarchitectureunderpinsyieldimprovementunderdroughtinmaize
AT salinasandrea reproductiveresiliencebutnotrootarchitectureunderpinsyieldimprovementunderdroughtinmaize
AT fangyinan reproductiveresiliencebutnotrootarchitectureunderpinsyieldimprovementunderdroughtinmaize
AT ghocarla reproductiveresiliencebutnotrootarchitectureunderpinsyieldimprovementunderdroughtinmaize
AT tangtom reproductiveresiliencebutnotrootarchitectureunderpinsyieldimprovementunderdroughtinmaize
AT grahamgeoff reproductiveresiliencebutnotrootarchitectureunderpinsyieldimprovementunderdroughtinmaize
AT hammergraemel reproductiveresiliencebutnotrootarchitectureunderpinsyieldimprovementunderdroughtinmaize
AT coopermark reproductiveresiliencebutnotrootarchitectureunderpinsyieldimprovementunderdroughtinmaize