Cargando…
Reproductive resilience but not root architecture underpins yield improvement under drought in maize
Because plants capture water and nutrients through roots, it was proposed that changes in root systems architecture (RSA) might underpin the 3-fold increase in maize (Zea mays L.) grain yield over the last century. Here we show that both RSA and yield have changed with decades of maize breeding, but...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8272564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34037765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab231 |
_version_ | 1783721246230315008 |
---|---|
author | Messina, Carlos McDonald, Dan Poffenbarger, Hanna Clark, Randy Salinas, Andrea Fang, Yinan Gho, Carla Tang, Tom Graham, Geoff Hammer, Graeme L Cooper, Mark |
author_facet | Messina, Carlos McDonald, Dan Poffenbarger, Hanna Clark, Randy Salinas, Andrea Fang, Yinan Gho, Carla Tang, Tom Graham, Geoff Hammer, Graeme L Cooper, Mark |
author_sort | Messina, Carlos |
collection | PubMed |
description | Because plants capture water and nutrients through roots, it was proposed that changes in root systems architecture (RSA) might underpin the 3-fold increase in maize (Zea mays L.) grain yield over the last century. Here we show that both RSA and yield have changed with decades of maize breeding, but not the crop water uptake. Results from X-ray phenotyping in controlled environments showed that single cross (SX) hybrids have smaller root systems than double cross (DX) hybrids for root diameters between 2465 µm and 181µm (P<0.05). Soil water extraction measured under field conditions ranged between 2.6 mm d(–1) and 2.9 mm d(–1) but were not significantly different between SX and DX hybrids. Yield and yield components were higher for SX than DX hybrids across densities and irrigation (P<0.001). Taken together, the results suggest that changes in RSA were not the cause of increased water uptake but an adaptation to high-density stands used in modern agriculture. This adaptation may have contributed to shift in resource allocation to the ear and indirectly improved reproductive resilience. Advances in root physiology and phenotyping can create opportunities to maintain long-term genetic gain in maize, but a shift from ideotype to crop and production system thinking will be required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8272564 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82725642021-07-12 Reproductive resilience but not root architecture underpins yield improvement under drought in maize Messina, Carlos McDonald, Dan Poffenbarger, Hanna Clark, Randy Salinas, Andrea Fang, Yinan Gho, Carla Tang, Tom Graham, Geoff Hammer, Graeme L Cooper, Mark J Exp Bot eXtra Botany Because plants capture water and nutrients through roots, it was proposed that changes in root systems architecture (RSA) might underpin the 3-fold increase in maize (Zea mays L.) grain yield over the last century. Here we show that both RSA and yield have changed with decades of maize breeding, but not the crop water uptake. Results from X-ray phenotyping in controlled environments showed that single cross (SX) hybrids have smaller root systems than double cross (DX) hybrids for root diameters between 2465 µm and 181µm (P<0.05). Soil water extraction measured under field conditions ranged between 2.6 mm d(–1) and 2.9 mm d(–1) but were not significantly different between SX and DX hybrids. Yield and yield components were higher for SX than DX hybrids across densities and irrigation (P<0.001). Taken together, the results suggest that changes in RSA were not the cause of increased water uptake but an adaptation to high-density stands used in modern agriculture. This adaptation may have contributed to shift in resource allocation to the ear and indirectly improved reproductive resilience. Advances in root physiology and phenotyping can create opportunities to maintain long-term genetic gain in maize, but a shift from ideotype to crop and production system thinking will be required. Oxford University Press 2021-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8272564/ /pubmed/34037765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab231 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | eXtra Botany Messina, Carlos McDonald, Dan Poffenbarger, Hanna Clark, Randy Salinas, Andrea Fang, Yinan Gho, Carla Tang, Tom Graham, Geoff Hammer, Graeme L Cooper, Mark Reproductive resilience but not root architecture underpins yield improvement under drought in maize |
title | Reproductive resilience but not root architecture underpins yield improvement under drought in maize |
title_full | Reproductive resilience but not root architecture underpins yield improvement under drought in maize |
title_fullStr | Reproductive resilience but not root architecture underpins yield improvement under drought in maize |
title_full_unstemmed | Reproductive resilience but not root architecture underpins yield improvement under drought in maize |
title_short | Reproductive resilience but not root architecture underpins yield improvement under drought in maize |
title_sort | reproductive resilience but not root architecture underpins yield improvement under drought in maize |
topic | eXtra Botany |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8272564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34037765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab231 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT messinacarlos reproductiveresiliencebutnotrootarchitectureunderpinsyieldimprovementunderdroughtinmaize AT mcdonalddan reproductiveresiliencebutnotrootarchitectureunderpinsyieldimprovementunderdroughtinmaize AT poffenbargerhanna reproductiveresiliencebutnotrootarchitectureunderpinsyieldimprovementunderdroughtinmaize AT clarkrandy reproductiveresiliencebutnotrootarchitectureunderpinsyieldimprovementunderdroughtinmaize AT salinasandrea reproductiveresiliencebutnotrootarchitectureunderpinsyieldimprovementunderdroughtinmaize AT fangyinan reproductiveresiliencebutnotrootarchitectureunderpinsyieldimprovementunderdroughtinmaize AT ghocarla reproductiveresiliencebutnotrootarchitectureunderpinsyieldimprovementunderdroughtinmaize AT tangtom reproductiveresiliencebutnotrootarchitectureunderpinsyieldimprovementunderdroughtinmaize AT grahamgeoff reproductiveresiliencebutnotrootarchitectureunderpinsyieldimprovementunderdroughtinmaize AT hammergraemel reproductiveresiliencebutnotrootarchitectureunderpinsyieldimprovementunderdroughtinmaize AT coopermark reproductiveresiliencebutnotrootarchitectureunderpinsyieldimprovementunderdroughtinmaize |