Cargando…

Quantitative Backscattered Electron Imaging of Bone Using a Thermionic or a Field Emission Electron Source

Quantitative backscattered electron imaging is an established method to map mineral content distributions in bone and to determine the bone mineralization density distribution (BMDD). The method we applied was initially validated for a scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with a tungsten hair...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hartmann, Markus A., Blouin, Stéphane, Misof, Barbara M., Fratzl-Zelman, Nadja, Roschger, Paul, Berzlanovich, Andrea, Gruber, Gerlinde M., Brugger, Peter C., Zwerina, Jochen, Fratzl, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33837801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00223-021-00832-5
_version_ 1783721307316158464
author Hartmann, Markus A.
Blouin, Stéphane
Misof, Barbara M.
Fratzl-Zelman, Nadja
Roschger, Paul
Berzlanovich, Andrea
Gruber, Gerlinde M.
Brugger, Peter C.
Zwerina, Jochen
Fratzl, Peter
author_facet Hartmann, Markus A.
Blouin, Stéphane
Misof, Barbara M.
Fratzl-Zelman, Nadja
Roschger, Paul
Berzlanovich, Andrea
Gruber, Gerlinde M.
Brugger, Peter C.
Zwerina, Jochen
Fratzl, Peter
author_sort Hartmann, Markus A.
collection PubMed
description Quantitative backscattered electron imaging is an established method to map mineral content distributions in bone and to determine the bone mineralization density distribution (BMDD). The method we applied was initially validated for a scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with a tungsten hairpin cathode (thermionic electron emission) under strongly defined settings of SEM parameters. For several reasons, it would be interesting to migrate the technique to a SEM with a field emission electron source (FE-SEM), which, however, would require to work with different SEM parameter settings as have been validated for DSM 962. The FE-SEM has a much better spatial resolution based on an electron source size in the order of several 100 nanometers, corresponding to an about [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] times smaller source area compared to thermionic sources. In the present work, we compare BMDD between these two types of instruments in order to further validate the methodology. We show that a transition to higher pixel resolution (1.76, 0.88, and 0.57 μm) results in shifts of the BMDD peak and BMDD width to higher values. Further the inter-device reproducibility of the mean calcium content shows a difference of up to 1 wt% Ca, while the technical variance of each device can be reduced to [Formula: see text] wt% Ca. Bearing in mind that shifts in calcium levels due to diseases, e.g., high turnover osteoporosis, are often in the range of 1 wt% Ca, both the bone samples of the patients as well as the control samples have to be measured on the same SEM device. Therefore, we also constructed new reference BMDD curves for adults to be used for FE-SEM data comparison.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8273060
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82730602021-07-20 Quantitative Backscattered Electron Imaging of Bone Using a Thermionic or a Field Emission Electron Source Hartmann, Markus A. Blouin, Stéphane Misof, Barbara M. Fratzl-Zelman, Nadja Roschger, Paul Berzlanovich, Andrea Gruber, Gerlinde M. Brugger, Peter C. Zwerina, Jochen Fratzl, Peter Calcif Tissue Int Original Research Quantitative backscattered electron imaging is an established method to map mineral content distributions in bone and to determine the bone mineralization density distribution (BMDD). The method we applied was initially validated for a scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with a tungsten hairpin cathode (thermionic electron emission) under strongly defined settings of SEM parameters. For several reasons, it would be interesting to migrate the technique to a SEM with a field emission electron source (FE-SEM), which, however, would require to work with different SEM parameter settings as have been validated for DSM 962. The FE-SEM has a much better spatial resolution based on an electron source size in the order of several 100 nanometers, corresponding to an about [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] times smaller source area compared to thermionic sources. In the present work, we compare BMDD between these two types of instruments in order to further validate the methodology. We show that a transition to higher pixel resolution (1.76, 0.88, and 0.57 μm) results in shifts of the BMDD peak and BMDD width to higher values. Further the inter-device reproducibility of the mean calcium content shows a difference of up to 1 wt% Ca, while the technical variance of each device can be reduced to [Formula: see text] wt% Ca. Bearing in mind that shifts in calcium levels due to diseases, e.g., high turnover osteoporosis, are often in the range of 1 wt% Ca, both the bone samples of the patients as well as the control samples have to be measured on the same SEM device. Therefore, we also constructed new reference BMDD curves for adults to be used for FE-SEM data comparison. Springer US 2021-04-10 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8273060/ /pubmed/33837801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00223-021-00832-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Hartmann, Markus A.
Blouin, Stéphane
Misof, Barbara M.
Fratzl-Zelman, Nadja
Roschger, Paul
Berzlanovich, Andrea
Gruber, Gerlinde M.
Brugger, Peter C.
Zwerina, Jochen
Fratzl, Peter
Quantitative Backscattered Electron Imaging of Bone Using a Thermionic or a Field Emission Electron Source
title Quantitative Backscattered Electron Imaging of Bone Using a Thermionic or a Field Emission Electron Source
title_full Quantitative Backscattered Electron Imaging of Bone Using a Thermionic or a Field Emission Electron Source
title_fullStr Quantitative Backscattered Electron Imaging of Bone Using a Thermionic or a Field Emission Electron Source
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative Backscattered Electron Imaging of Bone Using a Thermionic or a Field Emission Electron Source
title_short Quantitative Backscattered Electron Imaging of Bone Using a Thermionic or a Field Emission Electron Source
title_sort quantitative backscattered electron imaging of bone using a thermionic or a field emission electron source
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33837801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00223-021-00832-5
work_keys_str_mv AT hartmannmarkusa quantitativebackscatteredelectronimagingofboneusingathermionicorafieldemissionelectronsource
AT blouinstephane quantitativebackscatteredelectronimagingofboneusingathermionicorafieldemissionelectronsource
AT misofbarbaram quantitativebackscatteredelectronimagingofboneusingathermionicorafieldemissionelectronsource
AT fratzlzelmannadja quantitativebackscatteredelectronimagingofboneusingathermionicorafieldemissionelectronsource
AT roschgerpaul quantitativebackscatteredelectronimagingofboneusingathermionicorafieldemissionelectronsource
AT berzlanovichandrea quantitativebackscatteredelectronimagingofboneusingathermionicorafieldemissionelectronsource
AT grubergerlindem quantitativebackscatteredelectronimagingofboneusingathermionicorafieldemissionelectronsource
AT bruggerpeterc quantitativebackscatteredelectronimagingofboneusingathermionicorafieldemissionelectronsource
AT zwerinajochen quantitativebackscatteredelectronimagingofboneusingathermionicorafieldemissionelectronsource
AT fratzlpeter quantitativebackscatteredelectronimagingofboneusingathermionicorafieldemissionelectronsource